Cargando…

Foreign National Patients in German Prison Psychiatry

INTRODUCTION: Over the past few years, the share of foreign national prisoners in the European and American justice systems has increased at a disproportionately high rate, yet studies on mental health issues among this diverse group are rare. Recent research suggests a range of factors leading to m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neumann, Britta, Ross, Thomas, Opitz-Welke, Annette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32116816
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00988
_version_ 1783499707966816256
author Neumann, Britta
Ross, Thomas
Opitz-Welke, Annette
author_facet Neumann, Britta
Ross, Thomas
Opitz-Welke, Annette
author_sort Neumann, Britta
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Over the past few years, the share of foreign national prisoners in the European and American justice systems has increased at a disproportionately high rate, yet studies on mental health issues among this diverse group are rare. Recent research suggests a range of factors leading to mental health vulnerability in foreign national prisoners, including language barriers, isolation, cultural misunderstanding, and legal standing. Relevant findings of topic-related studies indicate that under-referral to mental health services due to missed or misinterpreted symptoms is a major risk for foreign national prisoners. AIMS: We aimed to investigate the disparities regarding the percentage of foreign national patients who were treated in high-security hospitals compared to the psychiatric ward of prison hospitals—after adjusting for diagnosis, age, marital status, and substance abuse. We hypothesized that foreign national patients were underrepresented in compulsory, high-security mental health care. We also aimed to explore citizenship-related institutional disparities concerning diagnoses and self-harmful behavior. METHOD: From 2010 to 2015, data collected from high-security hospitals in the federal state of Baden-Wurttemberg and the psychiatric ward of a Berlin prison hospital was evaluated by comparing nationality, diagnosis, and self-harm using Fisher’s exact test and χ²-test. The odds ratios for citizenship-related differences in diagnosis and institution of treatment were evaluated by using logistic regression. RESULTS: Mentally ill foreign national patients were significantly less likely to be treated in high-security hospitals rather than prison hospital psychiatry (adjusted for diagnosis, age at admission, marital status, and substance abuse; adjusted OR = 0.5). Foreign nationals and Germans in prison hospital psychiatry showed no significant disparities in diagnosis; however, in high-security hospitals, foreign nationals were more likely to have been diagnosed with schizophrenia/psychotic or neurotic/stress-related disorders and were less likely to have been diagnosed with personality disorders than German patients. Additionally, foreign nationals were more likely to commit self-harm than Germans in prison hospital psychiatry, but significant citizenship-related differences could not be verified in high-security hospital patients. CONCLUSION: Treatment conditions of foreign national patients in prison psychiatry must be improved. To achieve this, the psychiatric assessment and (mental) health-related aspects of these patients should be further investigated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7033612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70336122020-02-28 Foreign National Patients in German Prison Psychiatry Neumann, Britta Ross, Thomas Opitz-Welke, Annette Front Psychiatry Psychiatry INTRODUCTION: Over the past few years, the share of foreign national prisoners in the European and American justice systems has increased at a disproportionately high rate, yet studies on mental health issues among this diverse group are rare. Recent research suggests a range of factors leading to mental health vulnerability in foreign national prisoners, including language barriers, isolation, cultural misunderstanding, and legal standing. Relevant findings of topic-related studies indicate that under-referral to mental health services due to missed or misinterpreted symptoms is a major risk for foreign national prisoners. AIMS: We aimed to investigate the disparities regarding the percentage of foreign national patients who were treated in high-security hospitals compared to the psychiatric ward of prison hospitals—after adjusting for diagnosis, age, marital status, and substance abuse. We hypothesized that foreign national patients were underrepresented in compulsory, high-security mental health care. We also aimed to explore citizenship-related institutional disparities concerning diagnoses and self-harmful behavior. METHOD: From 2010 to 2015, data collected from high-security hospitals in the federal state of Baden-Wurttemberg and the psychiatric ward of a Berlin prison hospital was evaluated by comparing nationality, diagnosis, and self-harm using Fisher’s exact test and χ²-test. The odds ratios for citizenship-related differences in diagnosis and institution of treatment were evaluated by using logistic regression. RESULTS: Mentally ill foreign national patients were significantly less likely to be treated in high-security hospitals rather than prison hospital psychiatry (adjusted for diagnosis, age at admission, marital status, and substance abuse; adjusted OR = 0.5). Foreign nationals and Germans in prison hospital psychiatry showed no significant disparities in diagnosis; however, in high-security hospitals, foreign nationals were more likely to have been diagnosed with schizophrenia/psychotic or neurotic/stress-related disorders and were less likely to have been diagnosed with personality disorders than German patients. Additionally, foreign nationals were more likely to commit self-harm than Germans in prison hospital psychiatry, but significant citizenship-related differences could not be verified in high-security hospital patients. CONCLUSION: Treatment conditions of foreign national patients in prison psychiatry must be improved. To achieve this, the psychiatric assessment and (mental) health-related aspects of these patients should be further investigated. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7033612/ /pubmed/32116816 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00988 Text en Copyright © 2020 Neumann, Ross and Opitz-Welke http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Neumann, Britta
Ross, Thomas
Opitz-Welke, Annette
Foreign National Patients in German Prison Psychiatry
title Foreign National Patients in German Prison Psychiatry
title_full Foreign National Patients in German Prison Psychiatry
title_fullStr Foreign National Patients in German Prison Psychiatry
title_full_unstemmed Foreign National Patients in German Prison Psychiatry
title_short Foreign National Patients in German Prison Psychiatry
title_sort foreign national patients in german prison psychiatry
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32116816
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00988
work_keys_str_mv AT neumannbritta foreignnationalpatientsingermanprisonpsychiatry
AT rossthomas foreignnationalpatientsingermanprisonpsychiatry
AT opitzwelkeannette foreignnationalpatientsingermanprisonpsychiatry