Cargando…

Breath-hold versus mid-ventilation in SBRT of adrenal metastases

PURPOSE: To improve local control in radiotherapy of adrenal metastases precise dose delivery without increasing toxicity is vital. Decreasing the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) – Planning Target Volume (PTV) margins by reducing breathing movement can achieve this. Few data were published concerning t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Kuijer, Melissa, van Egmond, Jaap, Kouwenhoven, E., Bruijn-Krist, Dieke, Ceha, Heleen, Mast, Mirjam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2019.11.007
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To improve local control in radiotherapy of adrenal metastases precise dose delivery without increasing toxicity is vital. Decreasing the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) – Planning Target Volume (PTV) margins by reducing breathing movement can achieve this. Few data were published concerning the effect of a breath-hold technique. This study investigates the potential of Active Breathing Control (ABC) to limit adrenal breathing movement and reduce CTV-PTV margins. METHODS: We compared adrenal gland movement in free-breathing, making use of the Mid-ventilation (MidV) technique, and with ABC. The coordinates of the adrenal glands obtained on ten phases of a free breathing 4D-CT and on several repeat inspiration ABC CT-scans were measured. Separate coordinates, the random margin component and the margin vector norm were computed and compared between the two techniques. RESULTS: We compared the two techniques in 11 patients (21 adrenal glands) and found the largest movement in the Z-direction, with values of 8.7 ± 4.2 mm for MidV and 2.4 ± 1.5 mm for ABC. In 71% of the cases ABC resulted in a smaller margin component than MidV, although non-significant (p ≥ 0.4). CONCLUSION: Movement of the adrenal gland is largest in the Z-direction. The mean difference in the margin vector norm between both techniques was small with large variations over the patient group, the clinical effect of these differences is unknown. Applying an individualised motion management strategy could be beneficial. If a peak-to-peak amplitude above 15 mm in the Z-direction is observed in the MidV scan we advise to examine if a breath-hold technique could reduce margins.