Cargando…

RTT-led IGRT for cervix cancer; training, implementation and validation

INTRODUCTION: IGRT in cervical cancer treatment delivery is complex due to significant target and organs at risk (OAR) motion. Implementing image assessment of soft-tissue target and OAR position to improve accuracy is recommended. We report the development and refinement of a training and competenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alexander, S.E., Hopkins, N., Lalondrelle, S., Taylor, A., Titmarsh, K., McNair, H.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2019.10.007
_version_ 1783499743207358464
author Alexander, S.E.
Hopkins, N.
Lalondrelle, S.
Taylor, A.
Titmarsh, K.
McNair, H.A.
author_facet Alexander, S.E.
Hopkins, N.
Lalondrelle, S.
Taylor, A.
Titmarsh, K.
McNair, H.A.
author_sort Alexander, S.E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: IGRT in cervical cancer treatment delivery is complex due to significant target and organs at risk (OAR) motion. Implementing image assessment of soft-tissue target and OAR position to improve accuracy is recommended. We report the development and refinement of a training and competency programme (TCP), leading to on-line Radiation Therapist (RTT) led soft-tissue assessment, evaluated by a prospective audit. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The TCP comprised didactic lectures and practical sessions, supported by a comprehensive workbook. The content was decided by a team comprised of Clinical Oncologists, RTTs, and Physicists. On completion of training, RTT soft-tissue review proficiency (after bony anatomy registration) was assessed against a clinician gold-standard from a database of 20 cervical cancer CBCT images. Reviews were graded pass or fail based on PTV coverage assessment and decision taken in concordance with the gold-standard. Parity was set at ≥80% agreement. The initial TCP (stage one) focussed on offline verification and decision making. Sixteen RTTs completed this stage, four achieved ≥80%. This was not sufficient to support clinical implementation. The TCP was redesigned, more stringent review guidelines and greater anatomy teaching was added. TCP stage two focussed on online verification and decision making supported by a decision flowchart. Twenty-one RTTs completed this TCP, all achieved ≥80%. This supported clinical implementation of RTT-led soft-tissue review under prospective audit conditions. The prospective audit was conducted between March 2017 and August 2017. Daily online review was performed by two trained RTTs. Online review and decision making proficiency was evaluated by a clinician. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included in the audit. Daily online RTT-led IGRT was achieved for all 343 fractions. Two-hundred CBCT images were reviewed offline by the clinician; the mean number of reviews per patient was 15. 192/200 (96%) RTT image reviews were in agreement with clinician review, presenting excellent concordance. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary involvement in training development, redesign of the TCP and inclusion of summative competency assessment were important factors to support RTT skill development. Consequently, RTT-led cervical cancer soft-tissue IGRT was clinically implemented in the hospital.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7033802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70338022020-02-24 RTT-led IGRT for cervix cancer; training, implementation and validation Alexander, S.E. Hopkins, N. Lalondrelle, S. Taylor, A. Titmarsh, K. McNair, H.A. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol IGART in treatment delivery INTRODUCTION: IGRT in cervical cancer treatment delivery is complex due to significant target and organs at risk (OAR) motion. Implementing image assessment of soft-tissue target and OAR position to improve accuracy is recommended. We report the development and refinement of a training and competency programme (TCP), leading to on-line Radiation Therapist (RTT) led soft-tissue assessment, evaluated by a prospective audit. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The TCP comprised didactic lectures and practical sessions, supported by a comprehensive workbook. The content was decided by a team comprised of Clinical Oncologists, RTTs, and Physicists. On completion of training, RTT soft-tissue review proficiency (after bony anatomy registration) was assessed against a clinician gold-standard from a database of 20 cervical cancer CBCT images. Reviews were graded pass or fail based on PTV coverage assessment and decision taken in concordance with the gold-standard. Parity was set at ≥80% agreement. The initial TCP (stage one) focussed on offline verification and decision making. Sixteen RTTs completed this stage, four achieved ≥80%. This was not sufficient to support clinical implementation. The TCP was redesigned, more stringent review guidelines and greater anatomy teaching was added. TCP stage two focussed on online verification and decision making supported by a decision flowchart. Twenty-one RTTs completed this TCP, all achieved ≥80%. This supported clinical implementation of RTT-led soft-tissue review under prospective audit conditions. The prospective audit was conducted between March 2017 and August 2017. Daily online review was performed by two trained RTTs. Online review and decision making proficiency was evaluated by a clinician. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included in the audit. Daily online RTT-led IGRT was achieved for all 343 fractions. Two-hundred CBCT images were reviewed offline by the clinician; the mean number of reviews per patient was 15. 192/200 (96%) RTT image reviews were in agreement with clinician review, presenting excellent concordance. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary involvement in training development, redesign of the TCP and inclusion of summative competency assessment were important factors to support RTT skill development. Consequently, RTT-led cervical cancer soft-tissue IGRT was clinically implemented in the hospital. Elsevier 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7033802/ /pubmed/32095554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2019.10.007 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle IGART in treatment delivery
Alexander, S.E.
Hopkins, N.
Lalondrelle, S.
Taylor, A.
Titmarsh, K.
McNair, H.A.
RTT-led IGRT for cervix cancer; training, implementation and validation
title RTT-led IGRT for cervix cancer; training, implementation and validation
title_full RTT-led IGRT for cervix cancer; training, implementation and validation
title_fullStr RTT-led IGRT for cervix cancer; training, implementation and validation
title_full_unstemmed RTT-led IGRT for cervix cancer; training, implementation and validation
title_short RTT-led IGRT for cervix cancer; training, implementation and validation
title_sort rtt-led igrt for cervix cancer; training, implementation and validation
topic IGART in treatment delivery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2019.10.007
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderse rttledigrtforcervixcancertrainingimplementationandvalidation
AT hopkinsn rttledigrtforcervixcancertrainingimplementationandvalidation
AT lalondrelles rttledigrtforcervixcancertrainingimplementationandvalidation
AT taylora rttledigrtforcervixcancertrainingimplementationandvalidation
AT titmarshk rttledigrtforcervixcancertrainingimplementationandvalidation
AT mcnairha rttledigrtforcervixcancertrainingimplementationandvalidation