Cargando…

Patterns of practice of adaptive re-planning for anatomic variances during cone-beam CT guided radiotherapy

PURPOSE: Substantial, unanticipated anatomic variances during cone-beam CT (CBCT)-guided radiotherapy can potentially impact treatment accuracy and clinical outcomes. This study assessed patterns of practice of CBCT variances reported by RTTs and subsequent interventions for multiple-disease sites....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stankiewicz, Michal, Li, Winnie, Rosewall, Tara, Tadic, Tony, Dickie, Colleen, Velec, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2019.10.003
_version_ 1783499744577847296
author Stankiewicz, Michal
Li, Winnie
Rosewall, Tara
Tadic, Tony
Dickie, Colleen
Velec, Michael
author_facet Stankiewicz, Michal
Li, Winnie
Rosewall, Tara
Tadic, Tony
Dickie, Colleen
Velec, Michael
author_sort Stankiewicz, Michal
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Substantial, unanticipated anatomic variances during cone-beam CT (CBCT)-guided radiotherapy can potentially impact treatment accuracy and clinical outcomes. This study assessed patterns of practice of CBCT variances reported by RTTs and subsequent interventions for multiple-disease sites. METHODS: A chart review was conducted at a large cancer centre for patients treated with daily online CBCT-guided radiotherapy. Patients selected for review were identified via RTT-reported variances that then triggered offline multi-disciplinary assessment. Cases were categorized by the type of anatomic variance observed on CBCT and any further interventions recorded such as un-scheduled adaptive re-planning. RESULTS: Over a 1-year period, 287 variances from 261 patients were identified (6.2% of the 4207 patients treated with daily CBCT-guided radiotherapy), most often occurring within the first 5 fractions of the treatment course. Of these variances, 21% (59/287) were re-planned and 3.5% (10/287) discontinued treatment altogether. Lung was the most frequent disease-site (27% of 287 variances) reported with IGRT-related variances although head and neck and sarcoma were most frequently re-planned (19% of 59 re-plans for each site). Technical or clinical rationales for re-planning were not routinely documented in patient medical records. All disease-sites had numerous categories of variances. Three of the four most frequent categories were for tumor-related changes on CBCT, and the re-planning rate was highest for tumor progression at 25%. Normal tissue variances were the second most frequency category, and re-planned in 14% of those cases. CONCLUSION: RTTs identified a wide range of anatomic variances during CBCT-guided radiotherapy. In a minority of cases, these substantially altered the care plan including ad hoc adaptive re-planning or treatment discontinuation. Improved understanding of the clinical decisions in these cases would aid in developing more routine, systematic adaptive strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7033808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70338082020-02-24 Patterns of practice of adaptive re-planning for anatomic variances during cone-beam CT guided radiotherapy Stankiewicz, Michal Li, Winnie Rosewall, Tara Tadic, Tony Dickie, Colleen Velec, Michael Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol IGART in treatment delivery PURPOSE: Substantial, unanticipated anatomic variances during cone-beam CT (CBCT)-guided radiotherapy can potentially impact treatment accuracy and clinical outcomes. This study assessed patterns of practice of CBCT variances reported by RTTs and subsequent interventions for multiple-disease sites. METHODS: A chart review was conducted at a large cancer centre for patients treated with daily online CBCT-guided radiotherapy. Patients selected for review were identified via RTT-reported variances that then triggered offline multi-disciplinary assessment. Cases were categorized by the type of anatomic variance observed on CBCT and any further interventions recorded such as un-scheduled adaptive re-planning. RESULTS: Over a 1-year period, 287 variances from 261 patients were identified (6.2% of the 4207 patients treated with daily CBCT-guided radiotherapy), most often occurring within the first 5 fractions of the treatment course. Of these variances, 21% (59/287) were re-planned and 3.5% (10/287) discontinued treatment altogether. Lung was the most frequent disease-site (27% of 287 variances) reported with IGRT-related variances although head and neck and sarcoma were most frequently re-planned (19% of 59 re-plans for each site). Technical or clinical rationales for re-planning were not routinely documented in patient medical records. All disease-sites had numerous categories of variances. Three of the four most frequent categories were for tumor-related changes on CBCT, and the re-planning rate was highest for tumor progression at 25%. Normal tissue variances were the second most frequency category, and re-planned in 14% of those cases. CONCLUSION: RTTs identified a wide range of anatomic variances during CBCT-guided radiotherapy. In a minority of cases, these substantially altered the care plan including ad hoc adaptive re-planning or treatment discontinuation. Improved understanding of the clinical decisions in these cases would aid in developing more routine, systematic adaptive strategies. Elsevier 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7033808/ /pubmed/32095555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2019.10.003 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle IGART in treatment delivery
Stankiewicz, Michal
Li, Winnie
Rosewall, Tara
Tadic, Tony
Dickie, Colleen
Velec, Michael
Patterns of practice of adaptive re-planning for anatomic variances during cone-beam CT guided radiotherapy
title Patterns of practice of adaptive re-planning for anatomic variances during cone-beam CT guided radiotherapy
title_full Patterns of practice of adaptive re-planning for anatomic variances during cone-beam CT guided radiotherapy
title_fullStr Patterns of practice of adaptive re-planning for anatomic variances during cone-beam CT guided radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Patterns of practice of adaptive re-planning for anatomic variances during cone-beam CT guided radiotherapy
title_short Patterns of practice of adaptive re-planning for anatomic variances during cone-beam CT guided radiotherapy
title_sort patterns of practice of adaptive re-planning for anatomic variances during cone-beam ct guided radiotherapy
topic IGART in treatment delivery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2019.10.003
work_keys_str_mv AT stankiewiczmichal patternsofpracticeofadaptivereplanningforanatomicvariancesduringconebeamctguidedradiotherapy
AT liwinnie patternsofpracticeofadaptivereplanningforanatomicvariancesduringconebeamctguidedradiotherapy
AT rosewalltara patternsofpracticeofadaptivereplanningforanatomicvariancesduringconebeamctguidedradiotherapy
AT tadictony patternsofpracticeofadaptivereplanningforanatomicvariancesduringconebeamctguidedradiotherapy
AT dickiecolleen patternsofpracticeofadaptivereplanningforanatomicvariancesduringconebeamctguidedradiotherapy
AT velecmichael patternsofpracticeofadaptivereplanningforanatomicvariancesduringconebeamctguidedradiotherapy