Cargando…
Effect of individualized PEEP titration guided by intratidal compliance profile analysis on regional ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography – a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may reduce dynamic strain during mechanical ventilation. Although numerous approaches for PEEP titration have been proposed, there is no accepted strategy for titrating optimal PEEP. By analyzing intratidal compliance profiles, P...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32079526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-00960-9 |
_version_ | 1783499773673734144 |
---|---|
author | Weber, Jonas Gutjahr, Jan Schmidt, Johannes Lozano-Zahonero, Sara Borgmann, Silke Schumann, Stefan Wirth, Steffen |
author_facet | Weber, Jonas Gutjahr, Jan Schmidt, Johannes Lozano-Zahonero, Sara Borgmann, Silke Schumann, Stefan Wirth, Steffen |
author_sort | Weber, Jonas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may reduce dynamic strain during mechanical ventilation. Although numerous approaches for PEEP titration have been proposed, there is no accepted strategy for titrating optimal PEEP. By analyzing intratidal compliance profiles, PEEP may be individually titrated for patients. METHODS: After obtaining informed consent, 60 consecutive patients undergoing general anesthesia were randomly allocated to mechanical ventilation with PEEP 5 cmH(2)O (control group) or PEEP individually titrated, guided by an analysis of the intratidal compliance profile (intervention group). The primary endpoint was the frequency of each nonlinear intratidal compliance (C(RS)) profile of the respiratory system (horizontal, increasing, decreasing, and mixed). The secondary endpoints measured were respiratory mechanics, hemodynamic variables, and regional ventilation, which was assessed via electrical impedance tomography. RESULTS: The frequencies of the C(RS) profiles were comparable between the groups. Besides PEEP [control: 5.0 (0.0), intervention: 5.8 (1.1) cmH(2)O, p < 0.001], the respiratory and hemodynamic variables were comparable between the two groups. The compliance profile analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups. The loss of ventral and dorsal regional ventilation was higher in the control [ventral: 41.0 (16.3)%; dorsal: 25.9 (13.8)%] than in the intervention group [ventral: 29.3 (17.6)%; dorsal: 16.4 (12.7)%; p (ventral) = 0.039, p (dorsal) = 0.028]. CONCLUSIONS: Unfavorable compliance profiles indicating tidal derecruitment were found less often than in earlier studies. Individualized PEEP titration resulted in slightly higher PEEP. A slight global increase in aeration associated with this was indicated by regional gain and loss analysis. Differences in dorsal to ventral ventilation distribution were not found. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was registered at the German Register for Clinical Trials (DRKS00008924) on August 10, 2015. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7033933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70339332020-02-27 Effect of individualized PEEP titration guided by intratidal compliance profile analysis on regional ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography – a randomized controlled trial Weber, Jonas Gutjahr, Jan Schmidt, Johannes Lozano-Zahonero, Sara Borgmann, Silke Schumann, Stefan Wirth, Steffen BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may reduce dynamic strain during mechanical ventilation. Although numerous approaches for PEEP titration have been proposed, there is no accepted strategy for titrating optimal PEEP. By analyzing intratidal compliance profiles, PEEP may be individually titrated for patients. METHODS: After obtaining informed consent, 60 consecutive patients undergoing general anesthesia were randomly allocated to mechanical ventilation with PEEP 5 cmH(2)O (control group) or PEEP individually titrated, guided by an analysis of the intratidal compliance profile (intervention group). The primary endpoint was the frequency of each nonlinear intratidal compliance (C(RS)) profile of the respiratory system (horizontal, increasing, decreasing, and mixed). The secondary endpoints measured were respiratory mechanics, hemodynamic variables, and regional ventilation, which was assessed via electrical impedance tomography. RESULTS: The frequencies of the C(RS) profiles were comparable between the groups. Besides PEEP [control: 5.0 (0.0), intervention: 5.8 (1.1) cmH(2)O, p < 0.001], the respiratory and hemodynamic variables were comparable between the two groups. The compliance profile analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups. The loss of ventral and dorsal regional ventilation was higher in the control [ventral: 41.0 (16.3)%; dorsal: 25.9 (13.8)%] than in the intervention group [ventral: 29.3 (17.6)%; dorsal: 16.4 (12.7)%; p (ventral) = 0.039, p (dorsal) = 0.028]. CONCLUSIONS: Unfavorable compliance profiles indicating tidal derecruitment were found less often than in earlier studies. Individualized PEEP titration resulted in slightly higher PEEP. A slight global increase in aeration associated with this was indicated by regional gain and loss analysis. Differences in dorsal to ventral ventilation distribution were not found. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was registered at the German Register for Clinical Trials (DRKS00008924) on August 10, 2015. BioMed Central 2020-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7033933/ /pubmed/32079526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-00960-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Weber, Jonas Gutjahr, Jan Schmidt, Johannes Lozano-Zahonero, Sara Borgmann, Silke Schumann, Stefan Wirth, Steffen Effect of individualized PEEP titration guided by intratidal compliance profile analysis on regional ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography – a randomized controlled trial |
title | Effect of individualized PEEP titration guided by intratidal compliance profile analysis on regional ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography – a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Effect of individualized PEEP titration guided by intratidal compliance profile analysis on regional ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography – a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Effect of individualized PEEP titration guided by intratidal compliance profile analysis on regional ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography – a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of individualized PEEP titration guided by intratidal compliance profile analysis on regional ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography – a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Effect of individualized PEEP titration guided by intratidal compliance profile analysis on regional ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography – a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | effect of individualized peep titration guided by intratidal compliance profile analysis on regional ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography – a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32079526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-00960-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weberjonas effectofindividualizedpeeptitrationguidedbyintratidalcomplianceprofileanalysisonregionalventilationassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gutjahrjan effectofindividualizedpeeptitrationguidedbyintratidalcomplianceprofileanalysisonregionalventilationassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schmidtjohannes effectofindividualizedpeeptitrationguidedbyintratidalcomplianceprofileanalysisonregionalventilationassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lozanozahonerosara effectofindividualizedpeeptitrationguidedbyintratidalcomplianceprofileanalysisonregionalventilationassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT borgmannsilke effectofindividualizedpeeptitrationguidedbyintratidalcomplianceprofileanalysisonregionalventilationassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schumannstefan effectofindividualizedpeeptitrationguidedbyintratidalcomplianceprofileanalysisonregionalventilationassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wirthsteffen effectofindividualizedpeeptitrationguidedbyintratidalcomplianceprofileanalysisonregionalventilationassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial |