Cargando…

Effect of individualized PEEP titration guided by intratidal compliance profile analysis on regional ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography – a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may reduce dynamic strain during mechanical ventilation. Although numerous approaches for PEEP titration have been proposed, there is no accepted strategy for titrating optimal PEEP. By analyzing intratidal compliance profiles, P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weber, Jonas, Gutjahr, Jan, Schmidt, Johannes, Lozano-Zahonero, Sara, Borgmann, Silke, Schumann, Stefan, Wirth, Steffen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32079526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-00960-9
_version_ 1783499773673734144
author Weber, Jonas
Gutjahr, Jan
Schmidt, Johannes
Lozano-Zahonero, Sara
Borgmann, Silke
Schumann, Stefan
Wirth, Steffen
author_facet Weber, Jonas
Gutjahr, Jan
Schmidt, Johannes
Lozano-Zahonero, Sara
Borgmann, Silke
Schumann, Stefan
Wirth, Steffen
author_sort Weber, Jonas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may reduce dynamic strain during mechanical ventilation. Although numerous approaches for PEEP titration have been proposed, there is no accepted strategy for titrating optimal PEEP. By analyzing intratidal compliance profiles, PEEP may be individually titrated for patients. METHODS: After obtaining informed consent, 60 consecutive patients undergoing general anesthesia were randomly allocated to mechanical ventilation with PEEP 5 cmH(2)O (control group) or PEEP individually titrated, guided by an analysis of the intratidal compliance profile (intervention group). The primary endpoint was the frequency of each nonlinear intratidal compliance (C(RS)) profile of the respiratory system (horizontal, increasing, decreasing, and mixed). The secondary endpoints measured were respiratory mechanics, hemodynamic variables, and regional ventilation, which was assessed via electrical impedance tomography. RESULTS: The frequencies of the C(RS) profiles were comparable between the groups. Besides PEEP [control: 5.0 (0.0), intervention: 5.8 (1.1) cmH(2)O, p < 0.001], the respiratory and hemodynamic variables were comparable between the two groups. The compliance profile analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups. The loss of ventral and dorsal regional ventilation was higher in the control [ventral: 41.0 (16.3)%; dorsal: 25.9 (13.8)%] than in the intervention group [ventral: 29.3 (17.6)%; dorsal: 16.4 (12.7)%; p (ventral) = 0.039, p (dorsal) = 0.028]. CONCLUSIONS: Unfavorable compliance profiles indicating tidal derecruitment were found less often than in earlier studies. Individualized PEEP titration resulted in slightly higher PEEP. A slight global increase in aeration associated with this was indicated by regional gain and loss analysis. Differences in dorsal to ventral ventilation distribution were not found. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was registered at the German Register for Clinical Trials (DRKS00008924) on August 10, 2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7033933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70339332020-02-27 Effect of individualized PEEP titration guided by intratidal compliance profile analysis on regional ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography – a randomized controlled trial Weber, Jonas Gutjahr, Jan Schmidt, Johannes Lozano-Zahonero, Sara Borgmann, Silke Schumann, Stefan Wirth, Steffen BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may reduce dynamic strain during mechanical ventilation. Although numerous approaches for PEEP titration have been proposed, there is no accepted strategy for titrating optimal PEEP. By analyzing intratidal compliance profiles, PEEP may be individually titrated for patients. METHODS: After obtaining informed consent, 60 consecutive patients undergoing general anesthesia were randomly allocated to mechanical ventilation with PEEP 5 cmH(2)O (control group) or PEEP individually titrated, guided by an analysis of the intratidal compliance profile (intervention group). The primary endpoint was the frequency of each nonlinear intratidal compliance (C(RS)) profile of the respiratory system (horizontal, increasing, decreasing, and mixed). The secondary endpoints measured were respiratory mechanics, hemodynamic variables, and regional ventilation, which was assessed via electrical impedance tomography. RESULTS: The frequencies of the C(RS) profiles were comparable between the groups. Besides PEEP [control: 5.0 (0.0), intervention: 5.8 (1.1) cmH(2)O, p < 0.001], the respiratory and hemodynamic variables were comparable between the two groups. The compliance profile analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups. The loss of ventral and dorsal regional ventilation was higher in the control [ventral: 41.0 (16.3)%; dorsal: 25.9 (13.8)%] than in the intervention group [ventral: 29.3 (17.6)%; dorsal: 16.4 (12.7)%; p (ventral) = 0.039, p (dorsal) = 0.028]. CONCLUSIONS: Unfavorable compliance profiles indicating tidal derecruitment were found less often than in earlier studies. Individualized PEEP titration resulted in slightly higher PEEP. A slight global increase in aeration associated with this was indicated by regional gain and loss analysis. Differences in dorsal to ventral ventilation distribution were not found. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was registered at the German Register for Clinical Trials (DRKS00008924) on August 10, 2015. BioMed Central 2020-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7033933/ /pubmed/32079526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-00960-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Weber, Jonas
Gutjahr, Jan
Schmidt, Johannes
Lozano-Zahonero, Sara
Borgmann, Silke
Schumann, Stefan
Wirth, Steffen
Effect of individualized PEEP titration guided by intratidal compliance profile analysis on regional ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography – a randomized controlled trial
title Effect of individualized PEEP titration guided by intratidal compliance profile analysis on regional ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography – a randomized controlled trial
title_full Effect of individualized PEEP titration guided by intratidal compliance profile analysis on regional ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography – a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Effect of individualized PEEP titration guided by intratidal compliance profile analysis on regional ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography – a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of individualized PEEP titration guided by intratidal compliance profile analysis on regional ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography – a randomized controlled trial
title_short Effect of individualized PEEP titration guided by intratidal compliance profile analysis on regional ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography – a randomized controlled trial
title_sort effect of individualized peep titration guided by intratidal compliance profile analysis on regional ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography – a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32079526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-00960-9
work_keys_str_mv AT weberjonas effectofindividualizedpeeptitrationguidedbyintratidalcomplianceprofileanalysisonregionalventilationassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gutjahrjan effectofindividualizedpeeptitrationguidedbyintratidalcomplianceprofileanalysisonregionalventilationassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schmidtjohannes effectofindividualizedpeeptitrationguidedbyintratidalcomplianceprofileanalysisonregionalventilationassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lozanozahonerosara effectofindividualizedpeeptitrationguidedbyintratidalcomplianceprofileanalysisonregionalventilationassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT borgmannsilke effectofindividualizedpeeptitrationguidedbyintratidalcomplianceprofileanalysisonregionalventilationassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schumannstefan effectofindividualizedpeeptitrationguidedbyintratidalcomplianceprofileanalysisonregionalventilationassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wirthsteffen effectofindividualizedpeeptitrationguidedbyintratidalcomplianceprofileanalysisonregionalventilationassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial