Cargando…

Assessment of arthroscopic shavers: a comparison test of resection performance and quality

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic shavers play an indispensable role in arthroscopic debridement. They have exquisite structures and similar designs. The purpose of this study was to establish a reproducible testing protocol to compare the resection performance and the quality (tensile strength, torsional st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Peng, Zhao, Gaiping, Gu, Xuelian, Chen, Zhi, Xu, Shaorong, Lai, Weiguo, Liu, Wentao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32085784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01596-8
_version_ 1783499775510839296
author Liang, Peng
Zhao, Gaiping
Gu, Xuelian
Chen, Zhi
Xu, Shaorong
Lai, Weiguo
Liu, Wentao
author_facet Liang, Peng
Zhao, Gaiping
Gu, Xuelian
Chen, Zhi
Xu, Shaorong
Lai, Weiguo
Liu, Wentao
author_sort Liang, Peng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic shavers play an indispensable role in arthroscopic debridement. They have exquisite structures and similar designs. The purpose of this study was to establish a reproducible testing protocol to compare the resection performance and the quality (tensile strength, torsional strength, and corrosion resistance) of different arthroscopic shavers with comparable designs. We hypothesized that there could be little difference in resection performance and quality between these shavers. METHODS: Incisor Plus Blade (IPB; Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA) and Double Serrated Plus Blade (DSPB; BJKMC, Shanghai, China) were selected for resection performance and quality test. For resection performance testing, the resection torque, which is the minimum torque required to cut off silicone blocks with the same cross-sectional area, was measured to evaluate the resection performance of shaver blades when the other factors remain the same. For quality testing, tensile and torsion tests of the shavers’ joint part were performed, and ultimate failure load and maximum torque were measured and compared. The corrosion resistance of these blades was assessed by the boiling water test based on the ISO13402. RESULTS: No significant difference existed in the resection torque between the shaver blades of IPB and DSPB (P = 0.54). To the failure load of shavers’ joint parts, IPB was significantly higher than DSPB, both in the outer and inner blades (P < 0.0001). The maximum torque of the joint part had no significant difference between IPB and DSPB (for inner blades P = 0.60 and outer blades P = 0.94). The failure load (for both IPB and DSPB P < 0.0001) and maximum torque (for IPB P = 0.0475 and DSPB P = 0.015) of the inner blades were higher than those of the outer blades. No blemishes were observed on the surface of the blades after corrosion resistance tests. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided some new methods to evaluate the resection performance and quality of different shavers. The resection performance, the torsional strength of the joint part, and the corrosion resistance of IPB and DSPB may show comparable properties, whereas the tensile strength of the shavers’ joint part showed some level of difference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7033941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70339412020-02-27 Assessment of arthroscopic shavers: a comparison test of resection performance and quality Liang, Peng Zhao, Gaiping Gu, Xuelian Chen, Zhi Xu, Shaorong Lai, Weiguo Liu, Wentao J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic shavers play an indispensable role in arthroscopic debridement. They have exquisite structures and similar designs. The purpose of this study was to establish a reproducible testing protocol to compare the resection performance and the quality (tensile strength, torsional strength, and corrosion resistance) of different arthroscopic shavers with comparable designs. We hypothesized that there could be little difference in resection performance and quality between these shavers. METHODS: Incisor Plus Blade (IPB; Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA) and Double Serrated Plus Blade (DSPB; BJKMC, Shanghai, China) were selected for resection performance and quality test. For resection performance testing, the resection torque, which is the minimum torque required to cut off silicone blocks with the same cross-sectional area, was measured to evaluate the resection performance of shaver blades when the other factors remain the same. For quality testing, tensile and torsion tests of the shavers’ joint part were performed, and ultimate failure load and maximum torque were measured and compared. The corrosion resistance of these blades was assessed by the boiling water test based on the ISO13402. RESULTS: No significant difference existed in the resection torque between the shaver blades of IPB and DSPB (P = 0.54). To the failure load of shavers’ joint parts, IPB was significantly higher than DSPB, both in the outer and inner blades (P < 0.0001). The maximum torque of the joint part had no significant difference between IPB and DSPB (for inner blades P = 0.60 and outer blades P = 0.94). The failure load (for both IPB and DSPB P < 0.0001) and maximum torque (for IPB P = 0.0475 and DSPB P = 0.015) of the inner blades were higher than those of the outer blades. No blemishes were observed on the surface of the blades after corrosion resistance tests. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided some new methods to evaluate the resection performance and quality of different shavers. The resection performance, the torsional strength of the joint part, and the corrosion resistance of IPB and DSPB may show comparable properties, whereas the tensile strength of the shavers’ joint part showed some level of difference. BioMed Central 2020-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7033941/ /pubmed/32085784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01596-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liang, Peng
Zhao, Gaiping
Gu, Xuelian
Chen, Zhi
Xu, Shaorong
Lai, Weiguo
Liu, Wentao
Assessment of arthroscopic shavers: a comparison test of resection performance and quality
title Assessment of arthroscopic shavers: a comparison test of resection performance and quality
title_full Assessment of arthroscopic shavers: a comparison test of resection performance and quality
title_fullStr Assessment of arthroscopic shavers: a comparison test of resection performance and quality
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of arthroscopic shavers: a comparison test of resection performance and quality
title_short Assessment of arthroscopic shavers: a comparison test of resection performance and quality
title_sort assessment of arthroscopic shavers: a comparison test of resection performance and quality
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32085784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01596-8
work_keys_str_mv AT liangpeng assessmentofarthroscopicshaversacomparisontestofresectionperformanceandquality
AT zhaogaiping assessmentofarthroscopicshaversacomparisontestofresectionperformanceandquality
AT guxuelian assessmentofarthroscopicshaversacomparisontestofresectionperformanceandquality
AT chenzhi assessmentofarthroscopicshaversacomparisontestofresectionperformanceandquality
AT xushaorong assessmentofarthroscopicshaversacomparisontestofresectionperformanceandquality
AT laiweiguo assessmentofarthroscopicshaversacomparisontestofresectionperformanceandquality
AT liuwentao assessmentofarthroscopicshaversacomparisontestofresectionperformanceandquality