Cargando…

Performance of three molecular methods for detection of Toxoplasma gondii in pork

Comparison of epidemiological data on the occurrence of Toxoplasma (T.) gondii tissue cysts in meat is hampered by the lack of standardization and a great variety of methods for molecular detection. Therefore, this study aimed to compare and validate three different polymerase chain reaction (PCR) m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bier, Nadja S., Schares, Gereon, Johne, Annette, Martin, Annett, Nöckler, Karsten, Mayer-Scholl, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7034005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2019.e00038
_version_ 1783499790190903296
author Bier, Nadja S.
Schares, Gereon
Johne, Annette
Martin, Annett
Nöckler, Karsten
Mayer-Scholl, Anne
author_facet Bier, Nadja S.
Schares, Gereon
Johne, Annette
Martin, Annett
Nöckler, Karsten
Mayer-Scholl, Anne
author_sort Bier, Nadja S.
collection PubMed
description Comparison of epidemiological data on the occurrence of Toxoplasma (T.) gondii tissue cysts in meat is hampered by the lack of standardization and a great variety of methods for molecular detection. Therefore, this study aimed to compare and validate three different polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods for detection of T. gondii DNA in pork. Analytical performance characteristics of two real time PCRs (qPCRs; Tg-qPCR1, Tg-qPCR2) and one conventional endpoint PCR (cPCR), all targeting the 529 repeated element, were assessed using genomic DNA of three clonal T. gondii types prevailing in Europe and North America. qPCR efficiencies for all three clonal types ranged between 93.8 and 94.4% (Tg-qPCR1) and 94.3–95.6% (Tg-qPCR2). Tg-qPCR1 and Tg-qPCR2 showed an overall PCR performance score of 85% and displayed a similar 95% detection limit of 1.067 and 1.561 genome equivalents per PCR reaction (GE/PCR), respectively. However, T. gondii DNA could be detected at concentrations as low as 0.1 GE/PCR. Reliable quantification is possible over 4 log ranges from 10(5) to 100 GE/PCR with mean repeatability relative standard deviations of ≤11% and reproducibility relative standard deviations of ≤12.7%. Presumably, both qPCRs are similarly suitable for sensitive and specific detection of T. gondii DNA in pork. In contrast, the cPCR using primer pair TOX5/Tox-8 proved to be highly sensitive with a detection limit of 1.41 GE/PCR, but not suitable for detection of T. gondii DNA in pork as unspecific amplification of porcine DNA was observed resulting in bands with similar size to the desired T. gondii-specific PCR product.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7034005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70340052020-02-24 Performance of three molecular methods for detection of Toxoplasma gondii in pork Bier, Nadja S. Schares, Gereon Johne, Annette Martin, Annett Nöckler, Karsten Mayer-Scholl, Anne Food Waterborne Parasitol Article Comparison of epidemiological data on the occurrence of Toxoplasma (T.) gondii tissue cysts in meat is hampered by the lack of standardization and a great variety of methods for molecular detection. Therefore, this study aimed to compare and validate three different polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods for detection of T. gondii DNA in pork. Analytical performance characteristics of two real time PCRs (qPCRs; Tg-qPCR1, Tg-qPCR2) and one conventional endpoint PCR (cPCR), all targeting the 529 repeated element, were assessed using genomic DNA of three clonal T. gondii types prevailing in Europe and North America. qPCR efficiencies for all three clonal types ranged between 93.8 and 94.4% (Tg-qPCR1) and 94.3–95.6% (Tg-qPCR2). Tg-qPCR1 and Tg-qPCR2 showed an overall PCR performance score of 85% and displayed a similar 95% detection limit of 1.067 and 1.561 genome equivalents per PCR reaction (GE/PCR), respectively. However, T. gondii DNA could be detected at concentrations as low as 0.1 GE/PCR. Reliable quantification is possible over 4 log ranges from 10(5) to 100 GE/PCR with mean repeatability relative standard deviations of ≤11% and reproducibility relative standard deviations of ≤12.7%. Presumably, both qPCRs are similarly suitable for sensitive and specific detection of T. gondii DNA in pork. In contrast, the cPCR using primer pair TOX5/Tox-8 proved to be highly sensitive with a detection limit of 1.41 GE/PCR, but not suitable for detection of T. gondii DNA in pork as unspecific amplification of porcine DNA was observed resulting in bands with similar size to the desired T. gondii-specific PCR product. Elsevier 2019-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7034005/ /pubmed/32095606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2019.e00038 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bier, Nadja S.
Schares, Gereon
Johne, Annette
Martin, Annett
Nöckler, Karsten
Mayer-Scholl, Anne
Performance of three molecular methods for detection of Toxoplasma gondii in pork
title Performance of three molecular methods for detection of Toxoplasma gondii in pork
title_full Performance of three molecular methods for detection of Toxoplasma gondii in pork
title_fullStr Performance of three molecular methods for detection of Toxoplasma gondii in pork
title_full_unstemmed Performance of three molecular methods for detection of Toxoplasma gondii in pork
title_short Performance of three molecular methods for detection of Toxoplasma gondii in pork
title_sort performance of three molecular methods for detection of toxoplasma gondii in pork
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7034005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2019.e00038
work_keys_str_mv AT biernadjas performanceofthreemolecularmethodsfordetectionoftoxoplasmagondiiinpork
AT scharesgereon performanceofthreemolecularmethodsfordetectionoftoxoplasmagondiiinpork
AT johneannette performanceofthreemolecularmethodsfordetectionoftoxoplasmagondiiinpork
AT martinannett performanceofthreemolecularmethodsfordetectionoftoxoplasmagondiiinpork
AT nocklerkarsten performanceofthreemolecularmethodsfordetectionoftoxoplasmagondiiinpork
AT mayerschollanne performanceofthreemolecularmethodsfordetectionoftoxoplasmagondiiinpork