Cargando…

Donor metabolic characteristics drive effects of faecal microbiota transplantation on recipient insulin sensitivity, energy expenditure and intestinal transit time

OBJECTIVE: Bariatric surgery improves glucose metabolism. Recent data suggest that faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) using faeces from postbariatric surgery diet-induced obese mice in germ-free mice improves glucose metabolism and intestinal homeostasis. We here investigated whether allogenic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Groot, Pieter, Scheithauer, Torsten, Bakker, Guido J, Prodan, Andrei, Levin, Evgeni, Khan, Muhammad Tanweer, Herrema, Hilde, Ackermans, Mariette, Serlie, Mireille J M, de Brauw, Maurits, Levels, Johannes H M, Sales, Amber, Gerdes, Victor E, Ståhlman, Marcus, Schimmel, Alinda W M, Dallinga-Thie, Geesje, Bergman, Jacques JGHM, Holleman, Frits, Hoekstra, Joost B L, Groen, Albert, Bäckhed, Fredrik, Nieuwdorp, Max
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7034343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31147381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318320
_version_ 1783499858046353408
author de Groot, Pieter
Scheithauer, Torsten
Bakker, Guido J
Prodan, Andrei
Levin, Evgeni
Khan, Muhammad Tanweer
Herrema, Hilde
Ackermans, Mariette
Serlie, Mireille J M
de Brauw, Maurits
Levels, Johannes H M
Sales, Amber
Gerdes, Victor E
Ståhlman, Marcus
Schimmel, Alinda W M
Dallinga-Thie, Geesje
Bergman, Jacques JGHM
Holleman, Frits
Hoekstra, Joost B L
Groen, Albert
Bäckhed, Fredrik
Nieuwdorp, Max
author_facet de Groot, Pieter
Scheithauer, Torsten
Bakker, Guido J
Prodan, Andrei
Levin, Evgeni
Khan, Muhammad Tanweer
Herrema, Hilde
Ackermans, Mariette
Serlie, Mireille J M
de Brauw, Maurits
Levels, Johannes H M
Sales, Amber
Gerdes, Victor E
Ståhlman, Marcus
Schimmel, Alinda W M
Dallinga-Thie, Geesje
Bergman, Jacques JGHM
Holleman, Frits
Hoekstra, Joost B L
Groen, Albert
Bäckhed, Fredrik
Nieuwdorp, Max
author_sort de Groot, Pieter
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Bariatric surgery improves glucose metabolism. Recent data suggest that faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) using faeces from postbariatric surgery diet-induced obese mice in germ-free mice improves glucose metabolism and intestinal homeostasis. We here investigated whether allogenic FMT using faeces from post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass donors (RYGB-D) compared with using faeces from metabolic syndrome donors (METS-D) has short-term effects on glucose metabolism, intestinal transit time and adipose tissue inflammation in treatment-naïve, obese, insulin-resistant male subjects. DESIGN: Subjects with metabolic syndrome (n=22) received allogenic FMT either from RYGB-D or METS-D. Hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity as well as lipolysis were measured at baseline and 2 weeks after FMT by hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic stable isotope ((2)H(2)-glucose and (2)H(5)-glycerol) clamp. Secondary outcome parameters were changes in resting energy expenditure, intestinal transit time, faecal short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) and bile acids, and inflammatory markers in subcutaneous adipose tissue related to intestinal microbiota composition. Faecal SCFA, bile acids, glycaemic control and inflammatory parameters were also evaluated at 8 weeks. RESULTS: We observed a significant decrease in insulin sensitivity 2 weeks after allogenic METS-D FMT (median rate of glucose disappearance: from 40.6 to 34.0 µmol/kg/min; p<0.01). Moreover, a trend (p=0.052) towards faster intestinal transit time following RYGB-D FMT was seen. Finally, we observed changes in faecal bile acids (increased lithocholic, deoxycholic and (iso)lithocholic acid after METS-D FMT), inflammatory markers (decreased adipose tissue chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) gene expression and plasma CCL2 after RYGB-D FMT) and changes in several intestinal microbiota taxa. CONCLUSION: Allogenic FMT using METS-D decreases insulin sensitivity in metabolic syndrome recipients when compared with using post-RYGB-D. Further research is needed to delineate the role of donor characteristics in FMT efficacy in human insulin-resistant subjects. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR4327.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7034343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70343432020-03-03 Donor metabolic characteristics drive effects of faecal microbiota transplantation on recipient insulin sensitivity, energy expenditure and intestinal transit time de Groot, Pieter Scheithauer, Torsten Bakker, Guido J Prodan, Andrei Levin, Evgeni Khan, Muhammad Tanweer Herrema, Hilde Ackermans, Mariette Serlie, Mireille J M de Brauw, Maurits Levels, Johannes H M Sales, Amber Gerdes, Victor E Ståhlman, Marcus Schimmel, Alinda W M Dallinga-Thie, Geesje Bergman, Jacques JGHM Holleman, Frits Hoekstra, Joost B L Groen, Albert Bäckhed, Fredrik Nieuwdorp, Max Gut Gut Microbiota OBJECTIVE: Bariatric surgery improves glucose metabolism. Recent data suggest that faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) using faeces from postbariatric surgery diet-induced obese mice in germ-free mice improves glucose metabolism and intestinal homeostasis. We here investigated whether allogenic FMT using faeces from post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass donors (RYGB-D) compared with using faeces from metabolic syndrome donors (METS-D) has short-term effects on glucose metabolism, intestinal transit time and adipose tissue inflammation in treatment-naïve, obese, insulin-resistant male subjects. DESIGN: Subjects with metabolic syndrome (n=22) received allogenic FMT either from RYGB-D or METS-D. Hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity as well as lipolysis were measured at baseline and 2 weeks after FMT by hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic stable isotope ((2)H(2)-glucose and (2)H(5)-glycerol) clamp. Secondary outcome parameters were changes in resting energy expenditure, intestinal transit time, faecal short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) and bile acids, and inflammatory markers in subcutaneous adipose tissue related to intestinal microbiota composition. Faecal SCFA, bile acids, glycaemic control and inflammatory parameters were also evaluated at 8 weeks. RESULTS: We observed a significant decrease in insulin sensitivity 2 weeks after allogenic METS-D FMT (median rate of glucose disappearance: from 40.6 to 34.0 µmol/kg/min; p<0.01). Moreover, a trend (p=0.052) towards faster intestinal transit time following RYGB-D FMT was seen. Finally, we observed changes in faecal bile acids (increased lithocholic, deoxycholic and (iso)lithocholic acid after METS-D FMT), inflammatory markers (decreased adipose tissue chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) gene expression and plasma CCL2 after RYGB-D FMT) and changes in several intestinal microbiota taxa. CONCLUSION: Allogenic FMT using METS-D decreases insulin sensitivity in metabolic syndrome recipients when compared with using post-RYGB-D. Further research is needed to delineate the role of donor characteristics in FMT efficacy in human insulin-resistant subjects. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR4327. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-03 2019-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7034343/ /pubmed/31147381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318320 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Gut Microbiota
de Groot, Pieter
Scheithauer, Torsten
Bakker, Guido J
Prodan, Andrei
Levin, Evgeni
Khan, Muhammad Tanweer
Herrema, Hilde
Ackermans, Mariette
Serlie, Mireille J M
de Brauw, Maurits
Levels, Johannes H M
Sales, Amber
Gerdes, Victor E
Ståhlman, Marcus
Schimmel, Alinda W M
Dallinga-Thie, Geesje
Bergman, Jacques JGHM
Holleman, Frits
Hoekstra, Joost B L
Groen, Albert
Bäckhed, Fredrik
Nieuwdorp, Max
Donor metabolic characteristics drive effects of faecal microbiota transplantation on recipient insulin sensitivity, energy expenditure and intestinal transit time
title Donor metabolic characteristics drive effects of faecal microbiota transplantation on recipient insulin sensitivity, energy expenditure and intestinal transit time
title_full Donor metabolic characteristics drive effects of faecal microbiota transplantation on recipient insulin sensitivity, energy expenditure and intestinal transit time
title_fullStr Donor metabolic characteristics drive effects of faecal microbiota transplantation on recipient insulin sensitivity, energy expenditure and intestinal transit time
title_full_unstemmed Donor metabolic characteristics drive effects of faecal microbiota transplantation on recipient insulin sensitivity, energy expenditure and intestinal transit time
title_short Donor metabolic characteristics drive effects of faecal microbiota transplantation on recipient insulin sensitivity, energy expenditure and intestinal transit time
title_sort donor metabolic characteristics drive effects of faecal microbiota transplantation on recipient insulin sensitivity, energy expenditure and intestinal transit time
topic Gut Microbiota
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7034343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31147381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318320
work_keys_str_mv AT degrootpieter donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT scheithauertorsten donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT bakkerguidoj donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT prodanandrei donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT levinevgeni donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT khanmuhammadtanweer donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT herremahilde donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT ackermansmariette donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT serliemireillejm donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT debrauwmaurits donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT levelsjohanneshm donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT salesamber donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT gerdesvictore donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT stahlmanmarcus donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT schimmelalindawm donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT dallingathiegeesje donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT bergmanjacquesjghm donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT hollemanfrits donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT hoekstrajoostbl donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT groenalbert donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT backhedfredrik donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime
AT nieuwdorpmax donormetaboliccharacteristicsdriveeffectsoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationonrecipientinsulinsensitivityenergyexpenditureandintestinaltransittime