Cargando…

Prognostic Value of Site-Specific Metastases and Surgery in De Novo Stage IV Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the prognostic roles of distant metastatic patterns in de novo metastatic triple-negative breast cancer to explore the roles of surgery on the primary tumor and to characterize the prognostic factors of organ-specific metastasis. MATERIAL/METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gu, Yinfang, Wu, Guowu, Zou, Xiaofang, Huang, Ping, Yi, Lilan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7034402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32043484
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.920432
_version_ 1783499869679255552
author Gu, Yinfang
Wu, Guowu
Zou, Xiaofang
Huang, Ping
Yi, Lilan
author_facet Gu, Yinfang
Wu, Guowu
Zou, Xiaofang
Huang, Ping
Yi, Lilan
author_sort Gu, Yinfang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the prognostic roles of distant metastatic patterns in de novo metastatic triple-negative breast cancer to explore the roles of surgery on the primary tumor and to characterize the prognostic factors of organ-specific metastasis. MATERIAL/METHODS: Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests were employed to compare survival outcomes among variables. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess risk factors for survival. The key endpoints were overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: A total of 1888 patients were eligible. Distant metastatic site displayed a significant prognostic impact on survival. Using liver metastasis as the reference, overall survival was higher for bone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.770, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.634–0.935, P=0.008) and lung (HR 0.747, 95% CI 0.612–0.911, P=0.004) metastases. Using patients with brain metastasis as the reference, patients with bone (HR 0.516, 95% CI 0.392–0.680, P<0.001), lung (HR 0.500, 95% CI 0.379–0.661, P<0.001) or liver (HR 0.670, 95% CI 0.496–0.905, P=0.009) metastases exhibited better overall survival. Single-site metastatic patients who received surgery for the primary tumor had more favorable overall survival (P<0.001) and breast cancer-specific survival (P<0.001) than those who did not. Additionally, age, insurance status, chemotherapy, and surgery affected overall survival for patients with isolated bone metastasis; chemotherapy, and surgery affected overall survival for patients with isolated lung metastasis; and insurance status, chemotherapy, and surgery affected overall survival for patients with isolated liver metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study verified the specific prognostic significance of distant metastatic site for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer at diagnosis. Surgery on the primary tumor significantly improved survival for patients with single distant metastasis. The identified prognostic factors contributed to evaluating the prognoses for distant metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7034402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70344022020-03-09 Prognostic Value of Site-Specific Metastases and Surgery in De Novo Stage IV Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis Gu, Yinfang Wu, Guowu Zou, Xiaofang Huang, Ping Yi, Lilan Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the prognostic roles of distant metastatic patterns in de novo metastatic triple-negative breast cancer to explore the roles of surgery on the primary tumor and to characterize the prognostic factors of organ-specific metastasis. MATERIAL/METHODS: Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests were employed to compare survival outcomes among variables. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess risk factors for survival. The key endpoints were overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: A total of 1888 patients were eligible. Distant metastatic site displayed a significant prognostic impact on survival. Using liver metastasis as the reference, overall survival was higher for bone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.770, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.634–0.935, P=0.008) and lung (HR 0.747, 95% CI 0.612–0.911, P=0.004) metastases. Using patients with brain metastasis as the reference, patients with bone (HR 0.516, 95% CI 0.392–0.680, P<0.001), lung (HR 0.500, 95% CI 0.379–0.661, P<0.001) or liver (HR 0.670, 95% CI 0.496–0.905, P=0.009) metastases exhibited better overall survival. Single-site metastatic patients who received surgery for the primary tumor had more favorable overall survival (P<0.001) and breast cancer-specific survival (P<0.001) than those who did not. Additionally, age, insurance status, chemotherapy, and surgery affected overall survival for patients with isolated bone metastasis; chemotherapy, and surgery affected overall survival for patients with isolated lung metastasis; and insurance status, chemotherapy, and surgery affected overall survival for patients with isolated liver metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study verified the specific prognostic significance of distant metastatic site for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer at diagnosis. Surgery on the primary tumor significantly improved survival for patients with single distant metastasis. The identified prognostic factors contributed to evaluating the prognoses for distant metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2020-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7034402/ /pubmed/32043484 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.920432 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2020 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Gu, Yinfang
Wu, Guowu
Zou, Xiaofang
Huang, Ping
Yi, Lilan
Prognostic Value of Site-Specific Metastases and Surgery in De Novo Stage IV Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis
title Prognostic Value of Site-Specific Metastases and Surgery in De Novo Stage IV Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis
title_full Prognostic Value of Site-Specific Metastases and Surgery in De Novo Stage IV Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis
title_fullStr Prognostic Value of Site-Specific Metastases and Surgery in De Novo Stage IV Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Value of Site-Specific Metastases and Surgery in De Novo Stage IV Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis
title_short Prognostic Value of Site-Specific Metastases and Surgery in De Novo Stage IV Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis
title_sort prognostic value of site-specific metastases and surgery in de novo stage iv triple-negative breast cancer: a population-based analysis
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7034402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32043484
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.920432
work_keys_str_mv AT guyinfang prognosticvalueofsitespecificmetastasesandsurgeryindenovostageivtriplenegativebreastcancerapopulationbasedanalysis
AT wuguowu prognosticvalueofsitespecificmetastasesandsurgeryindenovostageivtriplenegativebreastcancerapopulationbasedanalysis
AT zouxiaofang prognosticvalueofsitespecificmetastasesandsurgeryindenovostageivtriplenegativebreastcancerapopulationbasedanalysis
AT huangping prognosticvalueofsitespecificmetastasesandsurgeryindenovostageivtriplenegativebreastcancerapopulationbasedanalysis
AT yililan prognosticvalueofsitespecificmetastasesandsurgeryindenovostageivtriplenegativebreastcancerapopulationbasedanalysis