Cargando…
Self-managed programmes in homeless care as (reinvented) institutions
Purpose: Self-managed institutional homeless programmes started as an alternative to regular shelters. Using institutional theory as a lens, we aim to explore the experiences of stakeholders with the institutional aspects of a self-managed programs. Method: The data we analysed (56 interviews, both...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7034469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31973667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1719002 |
_version_ | 1783499883723882496 |
---|---|
author | Huber, Max A. Metze, Rosalie N. Stam, Martin Regenmortel, Tine Van Abma, Tineke A. |
author_facet | Huber, Max A. Metze, Rosalie N. Stam, Martin Regenmortel, Tine Van Abma, Tineke A. |
author_sort | Huber, Max A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: Self-managed institutional homeless programmes started as an alternative to regular shelters. Using institutional theory as a lens, we aim to explore the experiences of stakeholders with the institutional aspects of a self-managed programs. Method: The data we analysed (56 interviews, both open and semi-structured) were generated in a longitudinal participatory case-study into JES, a self-managed homeless shelter. In our analysis we went back and forth between our empirical data and theory, using a combination of systematic coding and interpretation. Participants were involved in all stages of the research. Results: Our analysis revealed similarities between JES and regular shelters, stemming from institutional similarities. Participants shared space and facilities with sixteen people, which caused an ongoing discussion on (enforcement of) rules. Participants loathed lack of private space. However, participants experienced freedom of choice over both their own life and management of JES and structures were experienced more fluid than in regular care. Some structures also appeared stimulated self-management. Conclusion: Our analysis showed how an institutional context influences self-management and suggested opportunities for introducing freedom and fluidity in institutional care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7034469 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70344692020-03-03 Self-managed programmes in homeless care as (reinvented) institutions Huber, Max A. Metze, Rosalie N. Stam, Martin Regenmortel, Tine Van Abma, Tineke A. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being Empirical Studies Purpose: Self-managed institutional homeless programmes started as an alternative to regular shelters. Using institutional theory as a lens, we aim to explore the experiences of stakeholders with the institutional aspects of a self-managed programs. Method: The data we analysed (56 interviews, both open and semi-structured) were generated in a longitudinal participatory case-study into JES, a self-managed homeless shelter. In our analysis we went back and forth between our empirical data and theory, using a combination of systematic coding and interpretation. Participants were involved in all stages of the research. Results: Our analysis revealed similarities between JES and regular shelters, stemming from institutional similarities. Participants shared space and facilities with sixteen people, which caused an ongoing discussion on (enforcement of) rules. Participants loathed lack of private space. However, participants experienced freedom of choice over both their own life and management of JES and structures were experienced more fluid than in regular care. Some structures also appeared stimulated self-management. Conclusion: Our analysis showed how an institutional context influences self-management and suggested opportunities for introducing freedom and fluidity in institutional care. Taylor & Francis 2020-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7034469/ /pubmed/31973667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1719002 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Empirical Studies Huber, Max A. Metze, Rosalie N. Stam, Martin Regenmortel, Tine Van Abma, Tineke A. Self-managed programmes in homeless care as (reinvented) institutions |
title | Self-managed programmes in homeless care as (reinvented) institutions |
title_full | Self-managed programmes in homeless care as (reinvented) institutions |
title_fullStr | Self-managed programmes in homeless care as (reinvented) institutions |
title_full_unstemmed | Self-managed programmes in homeless care as (reinvented) institutions |
title_short | Self-managed programmes in homeless care as (reinvented) institutions |
title_sort | self-managed programmes in homeless care as (reinvented) institutions |
topic | Empirical Studies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7034469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31973667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1719002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hubermaxa selfmanagedprogrammesinhomelesscareasreinventedinstitutions AT metzerosalien selfmanagedprogrammesinhomelesscareasreinventedinstitutions AT stammartin selfmanagedprogrammesinhomelesscareasreinventedinstitutions AT regenmorteltinevan selfmanagedprogrammesinhomelesscareasreinventedinstitutions AT abmatinekea selfmanagedprogrammesinhomelesscareasreinventedinstitutions |