Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion in patients aged <75 years versus ≥75 years: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of age on procedural and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions. METHODS: Literature search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar and Web of science, databases till March 2019. RESULTS: Seven studies including 7671 patients with an overall follow-up period of 1.5 to 5 years were included in our review. A total of 6299/1372 patients were included in non-elderly and elderly groups, respectively, with mean age and 67%/61% male patients. CTO-PCI was similarly successful in younger and older patients (82.8%, n = 5070 vs. 78.1%, n = 1010). The incidence of short-term outcomes was low across the studies and comparable between the two groups (all-cause mortality: 0.4% younger vs. 0.85% elderly, cerebrovascular accidents: 0.3% vs. 0.4%, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE): 1.53% vs. 3.72% and major bleeding: 0.57% vs. 2.18%). Long-term outcomes including all-cause mortality (8.89% vs. 29.5%), cardiac mortality (3.72% vs. 15%) and MACE (24.9% vs. 40%) occurred with a higher incidence in elderly patients. When results were segregated according to the success of CTO-PCI, reduced clinical events were noted with successful revascularization in either age group. CONCLUSION: Compared with the younger age group, CTO-PCI in elderly patients is safe and feasible with a comparable incidence of short-term outcomes. In either population, the incidence of long-term outcomes including survival remains a concern but when successful, CTO-PCI may be associated with improvement in terms of multiple patient-important clinical end-points.