Cargando…

A retrospective cohort study comparing two treatments for active venous leg ulcers

Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) have largely replaced traditional surgery for treatment of varicose veins (VVs) with active venous leg ulcers (VLUs), and multiple combined modes have emerged. A retrospective cohort study was performed to compare the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xiaochun, Zheng, Guofu, Ye, Bo, Chen, Weiqing, Xie, Hailiang, Zhang, Teng, Lin, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7034671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32080149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019317
_version_ 1783499919518072832
author Liu, Xiaochun
Zheng, Guofu
Ye, Bo
Chen, Weiqing
Xie, Hailiang
Zhang, Teng
Lin, Jing
author_facet Liu, Xiaochun
Zheng, Guofu
Ye, Bo
Chen, Weiqing
Xie, Hailiang
Zhang, Teng
Lin, Jing
author_sort Liu, Xiaochun
collection PubMed
description Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) have largely replaced traditional surgery for treatment of varicose veins (VVs) with active venous leg ulcers (VLUs), and multiple combined modes have emerged. A retrospective cohort study was performed to compare the effect of traditional surgery (high ligation and stripping followed with compression [compression plus HL-S]) to high ligation-endovenous laser ablation-foam sclerotherapy followed with compression (compression plus HL-EVLA-FS) on the treatment of active VLUs. Data of active VLUs treated in our center from 2008 to 2017 and followed up for 1 year were analyzed. The intervention measures in the first 5 years were compression plus HL-S, and in the following 5 years were compression plus HL-EVLA-FS. The primary outcome was ulcer healing time. The secondary outcomes were the VVs occlusion and clinical success as assessed by a change in venous clinical severity score (VCSS) and complications. The study included 120 patients and 200 patients treated with HL-S and HL-EVLA-FS, respectively, during 2008 to 2017. The average ulcer healing time were 2.3 ± 2.4 and 1.7 ± 1.7 months, respectively. Significant difference was found in the cumulative ulcers healing rate between the two groups (Hazard ratio [HR] and 95% confidence interval [CI] was respectively 1.458 and 1.140–1.865, P = .0002), but no difference was found in the VVs occlusion (HR and 95% CI was respectively 1.005 and 0.774–1.3071, P = .967). Significant difference occurred in 6 months and 12 months post-operatively in the VCSS change and in the procedure data and some complications between the 2 groups. In conclusion, the treatment of HL-EVLA-FS can accelerate the healing of VLUs, improve the VCSS and present superior procedure data. However, no advantage could be found in the VVs occlusion compared with control group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7034671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70346712020-03-10 A retrospective cohort study comparing two treatments for active venous leg ulcers Liu, Xiaochun Zheng, Guofu Ye, Bo Chen, Weiqing Xie, Hailiang Zhang, Teng Lin, Jing Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) have largely replaced traditional surgery for treatment of varicose veins (VVs) with active venous leg ulcers (VLUs), and multiple combined modes have emerged. A retrospective cohort study was performed to compare the effect of traditional surgery (high ligation and stripping followed with compression [compression plus HL-S]) to high ligation-endovenous laser ablation-foam sclerotherapy followed with compression (compression plus HL-EVLA-FS) on the treatment of active VLUs. Data of active VLUs treated in our center from 2008 to 2017 and followed up for 1 year were analyzed. The intervention measures in the first 5 years were compression plus HL-S, and in the following 5 years were compression plus HL-EVLA-FS. The primary outcome was ulcer healing time. The secondary outcomes were the VVs occlusion and clinical success as assessed by a change in venous clinical severity score (VCSS) and complications. The study included 120 patients and 200 patients treated with HL-S and HL-EVLA-FS, respectively, during 2008 to 2017. The average ulcer healing time were 2.3 ± 2.4 and 1.7 ± 1.7 months, respectively. Significant difference was found in the cumulative ulcers healing rate between the two groups (Hazard ratio [HR] and 95% confidence interval [CI] was respectively 1.458 and 1.140–1.865, P = .0002), but no difference was found in the VVs occlusion (HR and 95% CI was respectively 1.005 and 0.774–1.3071, P = .967). Significant difference occurred in 6 months and 12 months post-operatively in the VCSS change and in the procedure data and some complications between the 2 groups. In conclusion, the treatment of HL-EVLA-FS can accelerate the healing of VLUs, improve the VCSS and present superior procedure data. However, no advantage could be found in the VVs occlusion compared with control group. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7034671/ /pubmed/32080149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019317 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Liu, Xiaochun
Zheng, Guofu
Ye, Bo
Chen, Weiqing
Xie, Hailiang
Zhang, Teng
Lin, Jing
A retrospective cohort study comparing two treatments for active venous leg ulcers
title A retrospective cohort study comparing two treatments for active venous leg ulcers
title_full A retrospective cohort study comparing two treatments for active venous leg ulcers
title_fullStr A retrospective cohort study comparing two treatments for active venous leg ulcers
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective cohort study comparing two treatments for active venous leg ulcers
title_short A retrospective cohort study comparing two treatments for active venous leg ulcers
title_sort retrospective cohort study comparing two treatments for active venous leg ulcers
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7034671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32080149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019317
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxiaochun aretrospectivecohortstudycomparingtwotreatmentsforactivevenouslegulcers
AT zhengguofu aretrospectivecohortstudycomparingtwotreatmentsforactivevenouslegulcers
AT yebo aretrospectivecohortstudycomparingtwotreatmentsforactivevenouslegulcers
AT chenweiqing aretrospectivecohortstudycomparingtwotreatmentsforactivevenouslegulcers
AT xiehailiang aretrospectivecohortstudycomparingtwotreatmentsforactivevenouslegulcers
AT zhangteng aretrospectivecohortstudycomparingtwotreatmentsforactivevenouslegulcers
AT linjing aretrospectivecohortstudycomparingtwotreatmentsforactivevenouslegulcers
AT liuxiaochun retrospectivecohortstudycomparingtwotreatmentsforactivevenouslegulcers
AT zhengguofu retrospectivecohortstudycomparingtwotreatmentsforactivevenouslegulcers
AT yebo retrospectivecohortstudycomparingtwotreatmentsforactivevenouslegulcers
AT chenweiqing retrospectivecohortstudycomparingtwotreatmentsforactivevenouslegulcers
AT xiehailiang retrospectivecohortstudycomparingtwotreatmentsforactivevenouslegulcers
AT zhangteng retrospectivecohortstudycomparingtwotreatmentsforactivevenouslegulcers
AT linjing retrospectivecohortstudycomparingtwotreatmentsforactivevenouslegulcers