Cargando…

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the addition of lubiprostone to bowel preparation before colonoscopy

AIM: Adequate bowel preparation is essential to the quality of colonoscopy. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of the addition of lubiprostone to the bowel preparation process prior to colonoscopy. METHODS: Online databases, namely, PubMed, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Peng, He, Xue-Qian, Dong, Jie, Du, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7034681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32080109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019208
_version_ 1783499921467375616
author Li, Peng
He, Xue-Qian
Dong, Jie
Du, Jing
author_facet Li, Peng
He, Xue-Qian
Dong, Jie
Du, Jing
author_sort Li, Peng
collection PubMed
description AIM: Adequate bowel preparation is essential to the quality of colonoscopy. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of the addition of lubiprostone to the bowel preparation process prior to colonoscopy. METHODS: Online databases, namely, PubMed, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library, were searched for randomized controlled trials that assessed the additive effect of lubiprostone on the quality of colon preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Each included study was evaluated by the Jadad score to assess the quality of the study. The primary outcome was bowel preparation efficacy, defined as the proportion of patients with an excellent or poor preparation. The secondary outcomes included the length of the colonoscopy, polyp detection, and any adverse effects. RESULTS: In total, 5 articles published between 2008 and 2016 fulfilled the selection criteria. The addition of lubiprostone to the bowel cleansing process significantly increased the proportion of patients with an excellent preparation (risk ratio [RR] = 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.40–2.02, P < .00001) but did not decrease the procedural time or increase the polyp detection rate (mean difference = -0.52, 95% CI: -3.74–2.69, P = .75; RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.96–1.42, P = .13, respectively). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with any adverse events. CONCLUSION: The addition of lubiprostone to the bowel preparation regimen prior to colonoscopy is effective and safe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7034681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70346812020-03-10 A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the addition of lubiprostone to bowel preparation before colonoscopy Li, Peng He, Xue-Qian Dong, Jie Du, Jing Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 AIM: Adequate bowel preparation is essential to the quality of colonoscopy. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of the addition of lubiprostone to the bowel preparation process prior to colonoscopy. METHODS: Online databases, namely, PubMed, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library, were searched for randomized controlled trials that assessed the additive effect of lubiprostone on the quality of colon preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Each included study was evaluated by the Jadad score to assess the quality of the study. The primary outcome was bowel preparation efficacy, defined as the proportion of patients with an excellent or poor preparation. The secondary outcomes included the length of the colonoscopy, polyp detection, and any adverse effects. RESULTS: In total, 5 articles published between 2008 and 2016 fulfilled the selection criteria. The addition of lubiprostone to the bowel cleansing process significantly increased the proportion of patients with an excellent preparation (risk ratio [RR] = 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.40–2.02, P < .00001) but did not decrease the procedural time or increase the polyp detection rate (mean difference = -0.52, 95% CI: -3.74–2.69, P = .75; RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.96–1.42, P = .13, respectively). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with any adverse events. CONCLUSION: The addition of lubiprostone to the bowel preparation regimen prior to colonoscopy is effective and safe. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7034681/ /pubmed/32080109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019208 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 4500
Li, Peng
He, Xue-Qian
Dong, Jie
Du, Jing
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the addition of lubiprostone to bowel preparation before colonoscopy
title A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the addition of lubiprostone to bowel preparation before colonoscopy
title_full A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the addition of lubiprostone to bowel preparation before colonoscopy
title_fullStr A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the addition of lubiprostone to bowel preparation before colonoscopy
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the addition of lubiprostone to bowel preparation before colonoscopy
title_short A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the addition of lubiprostone to bowel preparation before colonoscopy
title_sort meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the addition of lubiprostone to bowel preparation before colonoscopy
topic 4500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7034681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32080109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019208
work_keys_str_mv AT lipeng ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoftheadditionoflubiprostonetobowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopy
AT hexueqian ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoftheadditionoflubiprostonetobowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopy
AT dongjie ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoftheadditionoflubiprostonetobowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopy
AT dujing ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoftheadditionoflubiprostonetobowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopy
AT lipeng metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoftheadditionoflubiprostonetobowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopy
AT hexueqian metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoftheadditionoflubiprostonetobowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopy
AT dongjie metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoftheadditionoflubiprostonetobowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopy
AT dujing metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoftheadditionoflubiprostonetobowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopy