Cargando…
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the addition of lubiprostone to bowel preparation before colonoscopy
AIM: Adequate bowel preparation is essential to the quality of colonoscopy. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of the addition of lubiprostone to the bowel preparation process prior to colonoscopy. METHODS: Online databases, namely, PubMed, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7034681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32080109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019208 |
_version_ | 1783499921467375616 |
---|---|
author | Li, Peng He, Xue-Qian Dong, Jie Du, Jing |
author_facet | Li, Peng He, Xue-Qian Dong, Jie Du, Jing |
author_sort | Li, Peng |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Adequate bowel preparation is essential to the quality of colonoscopy. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of the addition of lubiprostone to the bowel preparation process prior to colonoscopy. METHODS: Online databases, namely, PubMed, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library, were searched for randomized controlled trials that assessed the additive effect of lubiprostone on the quality of colon preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Each included study was evaluated by the Jadad score to assess the quality of the study. The primary outcome was bowel preparation efficacy, defined as the proportion of patients with an excellent or poor preparation. The secondary outcomes included the length of the colonoscopy, polyp detection, and any adverse effects. RESULTS: In total, 5 articles published between 2008 and 2016 fulfilled the selection criteria. The addition of lubiprostone to the bowel cleansing process significantly increased the proportion of patients with an excellent preparation (risk ratio [RR] = 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.40–2.02, P < .00001) but did not decrease the procedural time or increase the polyp detection rate (mean difference = -0.52, 95% CI: -3.74–2.69, P = .75; RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.96–1.42, P = .13, respectively). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with any adverse events. CONCLUSION: The addition of lubiprostone to the bowel preparation regimen prior to colonoscopy is effective and safe. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7034681 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70346812020-03-10 A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the addition of lubiprostone to bowel preparation before colonoscopy Li, Peng He, Xue-Qian Dong, Jie Du, Jing Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 AIM: Adequate bowel preparation is essential to the quality of colonoscopy. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of the addition of lubiprostone to the bowel preparation process prior to colonoscopy. METHODS: Online databases, namely, PubMed, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library, were searched for randomized controlled trials that assessed the additive effect of lubiprostone on the quality of colon preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Each included study was evaluated by the Jadad score to assess the quality of the study. The primary outcome was bowel preparation efficacy, defined as the proportion of patients with an excellent or poor preparation. The secondary outcomes included the length of the colonoscopy, polyp detection, and any adverse effects. RESULTS: In total, 5 articles published between 2008 and 2016 fulfilled the selection criteria. The addition of lubiprostone to the bowel cleansing process significantly increased the proportion of patients with an excellent preparation (risk ratio [RR] = 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.40–2.02, P < .00001) but did not decrease the procedural time or increase the polyp detection rate (mean difference = -0.52, 95% CI: -3.74–2.69, P = .75; RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.96–1.42, P = .13, respectively). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with any adverse events. CONCLUSION: The addition of lubiprostone to the bowel preparation regimen prior to colonoscopy is effective and safe. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7034681/ /pubmed/32080109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019208 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 4500 Li, Peng He, Xue-Qian Dong, Jie Du, Jing A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the addition of lubiprostone to bowel preparation before colonoscopy |
title | A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the addition of lubiprostone to bowel preparation before colonoscopy |
title_full | A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the addition of lubiprostone to bowel preparation before colonoscopy |
title_fullStr | A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the addition of lubiprostone to bowel preparation before colonoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the addition of lubiprostone to bowel preparation before colonoscopy |
title_short | A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the addition of lubiprostone to bowel preparation before colonoscopy |
title_sort | meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the addition of lubiprostone to bowel preparation before colonoscopy |
topic | 4500 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7034681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32080109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019208 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lipeng ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoftheadditionoflubiprostonetobowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopy AT hexueqian ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoftheadditionoflubiprostonetobowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopy AT dongjie ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoftheadditionoflubiprostonetobowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopy AT dujing ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoftheadditionoflubiprostonetobowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopy AT lipeng metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoftheadditionoflubiprostonetobowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopy AT hexueqian metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoftheadditionoflubiprostonetobowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopy AT dongjie metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoftheadditionoflubiprostonetobowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopy AT dujing metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoftheadditionoflubiprostonetobowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopy |