Cargando…

The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Thoracic diseases include a variety of common human primary malignant tumors, among which lung cancer and esophageal cancer are among the top 10 in cancer incidence and mortality. Early diagnosis is an important part of cancer treatment, so artificial intelligence (AI) systems have bee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Yi, Jin, Gang, Pang, Yao, Wang, Wenhao, Zhang, Hongyi, Tuo, Guangxin, Wu, Peng, Wang, Zequan, Zhu, Zijiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7035064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32049826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019114
_version_ 1783499999559024640
author Yang, Yi
Jin, Gang
Pang, Yao
Wang, Wenhao
Zhang, Hongyi
Tuo, Guangxin
Wu, Peng
Wang, Zequan
Zhu, Zijiang
author_facet Yang, Yi
Jin, Gang
Pang, Yao
Wang, Wenhao
Zhang, Hongyi
Tuo, Guangxin
Wu, Peng
Wang, Zequan
Zhu, Zijiang
author_sort Yang, Yi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Thoracic diseases include a variety of common human primary malignant tumors, among which lung cancer and esophageal cancer are among the top 10 in cancer incidence and mortality. Early diagnosis is an important part of cancer treatment, so artificial intelligence (AI) systems have been developed for the accurate and automated detection and diagnosis of thoracic tumors. However, the complicated AI structure and image processing made the diagnosis result of AI-based system unstable. The purpose of this study is to systematically review published evidence to explore the accuracy of AI systems in diagnosing thoracic cancers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of AI systems for the prediction of thoracic diseases. The primary objective is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of thoracic cancers, including assessing potential biases and calculating combined estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The secondary objective is to evaluate the factors associated with different models, classifiers, and radiomics information. We will search databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase (via OVID), and the Cochrane Library. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, perform full article reviews and extract study data. We will report study characteristics and assess methodological quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. RevMan 5.3 and Meta-disc 1.4 software will be used for data synthesis. If pooling is appropriate, we will produce summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves, summary operating points (pooled sensitivity and specificity), and 95% confidence intervals around the summary operating points. Methodological subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to explore heterogeneity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019135247
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7035064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70350642020-03-10 The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis Yang, Yi Jin, Gang Pang, Yao Wang, Wenhao Zhang, Hongyi Tuo, Guangxin Wu, Peng Wang, Zequan Zhu, Zijiang Medicine (Baltimore) 4100 INTRODUCTION: Thoracic diseases include a variety of common human primary malignant tumors, among which lung cancer and esophageal cancer are among the top 10 in cancer incidence and mortality. Early diagnosis is an important part of cancer treatment, so artificial intelligence (AI) systems have been developed for the accurate and automated detection and diagnosis of thoracic tumors. However, the complicated AI structure and image processing made the diagnosis result of AI-based system unstable. The purpose of this study is to systematically review published evidence to explore the accuracy of AI systems in diagnosing thoracic cancers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of AI systems for the prediction of thoracic diseases. The primary objective is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of thoracic cancers, including assessing potential biases and calculating combined estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The secondary objective is to evaluate the factors associated with different models, classifiers, and radiomics information. We will search databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase (via OVID), and the Cochrane Library. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, perform full article reviews and extract study data. We will report study characteristics and assess methodological quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. RevMan 5.3 and Meta-disc 1.4 software will be used for data synthesis. If pooling is appropriate, we will produce summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves, summary operating points (pooled sensitivity and specificity), and 95% confidence intervals around the summary operating points. Methodological subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to explore heterogeneity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019135247 Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7035064/ /pubmed/32049826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019114 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 4100
Yang, Yi
Jin, Gang
Pang, Yao
Wang, Wenhao
Zhang, Hongyi
Tuo, Guangxin
Wu, Peng
Wang, Zequan
Zhu, Zijiang
The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 4100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7035064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32049826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019114
work_keys_str_mv AT yangyi thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jingang thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pangyao thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangwenhao thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanghongyi thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tuoguangxin thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wupeng thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangzequan thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhuzijiang thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangyi diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jingang diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pangyao diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangwenhao diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanghongyi diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tuoguangxin diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wupeng diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangzequan diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhuzijiang diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis