Cargando…
The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Thoracic diseases include a variety of common human primary malignant tumors, among which lung cancer and esophageal cancer are among the top 10 in cancer incidence and mortality. Early diagnosis is an important part of cancer treatment, so artificial intelligence (AI) systems have bee...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7035064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32049826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019114 |
_version_ | 1783499999559024640 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Yi Jin, Gang Pang, Yao Wang, Wenhao Zhang, Hongyi Tuo, Guangxin Wu, Peng Wang, Zequan Zhu, Zijiang |
author_facet | Yang, Yi Jin, Gang Pang, Yao Wang, Wenhao Zhang, Hongyi Tuo, Guangxin Wu, Peng Wang, Zequan Zhu, Zijiang |
author_sort | Yang, Yi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Thoracic diseases include a variety of common human primary malignant tumors, among which lung cancer and esophageal cancer are among the top 10 in cancer incidence and mortality. Early diagnosis is an important part of cancer treatment, so artificial intelligence (AI) systems have been developed for the accurate and automated detection and diagnosis of thoracic tumors. However, the complicated AI structure and image processing made the diagnosis result of AI-based system unstable. The purpose of this study is to systematically review published evidence to explore the accuracy of AI systems in diagnosing thoracic cancers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of AI systems for the prediction of thoracic diseases. The primary objective is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of thoracic cancers, including assessing potential biases and calculating combined estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The secondary objective is to evaluate the factors associated with different models, classifiers, and radiomics information. We will search databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase (via OVID), and the Cochrane Library. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, perform full article reviews and extract study data. We will report study characteristics and assess methodological quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. RevMan 5.3 and Meta-disc 1.4 software will be used for data synthesis. If pooling is appropriate, we will produce summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves, summary operating points (pooled sensitivity and specificity), and 95% confidence intervals around the summary operating points. Methodological subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to explore heterogeneity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019135247 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7035064 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70350642020-03-10 The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis Yang, Yi Jin, Gang Pang, Yao Wang, Wenhao Zhang, Hongyi Tuo, Guangxin Wu, Peng Wang, Zequan Zhu, Zijiang Medicine (Baltimore) 4100 INTRODUCTION: Thoracic diseases include a variety of common human primary malignant tumors, among which lung cancer and esophageal cancer are among the top 10 in cancer incidence and mortality. Early diagnosis is an important part of cancer treatment, so artificial intelligence (AI) systems have been developed for the accurate and automated detection and diagnosis of thoracic tumors. However, the complicated AI structure and image processing made the diagnosis result of AI-based system unstable. The purpose of this study is to systematically review published evidence to explore the accuracy of AI systems in diagnosing thoracic cancers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of AI systems for the prediction of thoracic diseases. The primary objective is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of thoracic cancers, including assessing potential biases and calculating combined estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The secondary objective is to evaluate the factors associated with different models, classifiers, and radiomics information. We will search databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase (via OVID), and the Cochrane Library. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, perform full article reviews and extract study data. We will report study characteristics and assess methodological quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. RevMan 5.3 and Meta-disc 1.4 software will be used for data synthesis. If pooling is appropriate, we will produce summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves, summary operating points (pooled sensitivity and specificity), and 95% confidence intervals around the summary operating points. Methodological subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to explore heterogeneity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019135247 Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7035064/ /pubmed/32049826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019114 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 4100 Yang, Yi Jin, Gang Pang, Yao Wang, Wenhao Zhang, Hongyi Tuo, Guangxin Wu, Peng Wang, Zequan Zhu, Zijiang The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | 4100 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7035064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32049826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangyi thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jingang thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pangyao thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangwenhao thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhanghongyi thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tuoguangxin thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wupeng thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangzequan thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhuzijiang thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangyi diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jingang diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pangyao diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangwenhao diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhanghongyi diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tuoguangxin diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wupeng diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangzequan diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhuzijiang diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceinthoracicdiseasesaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |