Cargando…

Efficacy of prebiotics and probiotics for functional dyspepsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder. Evidence suggests that disturbance of the gastrointestinal microbiota may be implicated in FD. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy of prebiotics and probiotics for FD. METHODS: MED...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jiaqi, Wu, Hao Meng, Wang, Xue, Xie, Jingyi, Li, Xia, Ma, Jinxin, Wang, Fengyun, Tang, Xudong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7035106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32049821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019107
_version_ 1783500008202436608
author Zhang, Jiaqi
Wu, Hao Meng
Wang, Xue
Xie, Jingyi
Li, Xia
Ma, Jinxin
Wang, Fengyun
Tang, Xudong
author_facet Zhang, Jiaqi
Wu, Hao Meng
Wang, Xue
Xie, Jingyi
Li, Xia
Ma, Jinxin
Wang, Fengyun
Tang, Xudong
author_sort Zhang, Jiaqi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder. Evidence suggests that disturbance of the gastrointestinal microbiota may be implicated in FD. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy of prebiotics and probiotics for FD. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched (through September 2018). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that recruited adults with FD and that compared prebiotics, probiotics, or synbiotics with placebo or no therapy were eligible. Eligibility assessment and data extraction were performed by two independent researchers. Dichotomous symptom data were pooled to obtain a relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of remaining symptomatic after therapy. Continuous data were pooled using a standardized or weighted mean difference with a 95% CI. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 1062 citations. Five RCTs were eligible for inclusion. The RR of FD symptoms improving with probiotics or probiotics vs placebo was 1.15 (95% CI 1.01–1.30). Probiotics and prebiotics had beneficial effects on symptom scores of FD. Data for synbiotics in the context of FD were sparse, and no definite conclusions could be drawn. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study belongs to the category of systematic reviews, not clinical trials. Therefore, it does not require ethical approval. The results of this study will be published in influential international academic journals related to this topic. CONCLUSION: Probiotics and prebiotics seemed to be effective treatments for FD, although the individual species and strains that are the most beneficial remain unclear. Using only probiotics failed to improve the symptoms of FD. Further evidence is required before the role of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in FD can be fully understood.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7035106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70351062020-03-10 Efficacy of prebiotics and probiotics for functional dyspepsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Jiaqi Wu, Hao Meng Wang, Xue Xie, Jingyi Li, Xia Ma, Jinxin Wang, Fengyun Tang, Xudong Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 BACKGROUND: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder. Evidence suggests that disturbance of the gastrointestinal microbiota may be implicated in FD. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy of prebiotics and probiotics for FD. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched (through September 2018). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that recruited adults with FD and that compared prebiotics, probiotics, or synbiotics with placebo or no therapy were eligible. Eligibility assessment and data extraction were performed by two independent researchers. Dichotomous symptom data were pooled to obtain a relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of remaining symptomatic after therapy. Continuous data were pooled using a standardized or weighted mean difference with a 95% CI. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 1062 citations. Five RCTs were eligible for inclusion. The RR of FD symptoms improving with probiotics or probiotics vs placebo was 1.15 (95% CI 1.01–1.30). Probiotics and prebiotics had beneficial effects on symptom scores of FD. Data for synbiotics in the context of FD were sparse, and no definite conclusions could be drawn. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study belongs to the category of systematic reviews, not clinical trials. Therefore, it does not require ethical approval. The results of this study will be published in influential international academic journals related to this topic. CONCLUSION: Probiotics and prebiotics seemed to be effective treatments for FD, although the individual species and strains that are the most beneficial remain unclear. Using only probiotics failed to improve the symptoms of FD. Further evidence is required before the role of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in FD can be fully understood. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7035106/ /pubmed/32049821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019107 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 4500
Zhang, Jiaqi
Wu, Hao Meng
Wang, Xue
Xie, Jingyi
Li, Xia
Ma, Jinxin
Wang, Fengyun
Tang, Xudong
Efficacy of prebiotics and probiotics for functional dyspepsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy of prebiotics and probiotics for functional dyspepsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of prebiotics and probiotics for functional dyspepsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of prebiotics and probiotics for functional dyspepsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of prebiotics and probiotics for functional dyspepsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of prebiotics and probiotics for functional dyspepsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of prebiotics and probiotics for functional dyspepsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 4500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7035106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32049821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019107
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjiaqi efficacyofprebioticsandprobioticsforfunctionaldyspepsiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuhaomeng efficacyofprebioticsandprobioticsforfunctionaldyspepsiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangxue efficacyofprebioticsandprobioticsforfunctionaldyspepsiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiejingyi efficacyofprebioticsandprobioticsforfunctionaldyspepsiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lixia efficacyofprebioticsandprobioticsforfunctionaldyspepsiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT majinxin efficacyofprebioticsandprobioticsforfunctionaldyspepsiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangfengyun efficacyofprebioticsandprobioticsforfunctionaldyspepsiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tangxudong efficacyofprebioticsandprobioticsforfunctionaldyspepsiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis