Cargando…

Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population

PURPOSE: In this study, our aim was to evaluate the glenoid version, height, and width measurements based on gender, side, age, height, and hand dominance in the Turkish population using computed tomography (CT) images. METHODS: In our study, CT images of 140 patients (62 females and 78 males; mean...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarı, Abdulkadir, Dinçel, Yaşar Mahsut, Günaydın, Burak, Çetin, Mehmet Ümit, Özçaglayan, Ömer, Bilsel, Kerem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7035523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32104697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5736136
_version_ 1783500075429789696
author Sarı, Abdulkadir
Dinçel, Yaşar Mahsut
Günaydın, Burak
Çetin, Mehmet Ümit
Özçaglayan, Ömer
Bilsel, Kerem
author_facet Sarı, Abdulkadir
Dinçel, Yaşar Mahsut
Günaydın, Burak
Çetin, Mehmet Ümit
Özçaglayan, Ömer
Bilsel, Kerem
author_sort Sarı, Abdulkadir
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In this study, our aim was to evaluate the glenoid version, height, and width measurements based on gender, side, age, height, and hand dominance in the Turkish population using computed tomography (CT) images. METHODS: In our study, CT images of 140 patients (62 females and 78 males; mean age: 39.6 years) who had no shoulder complaints were evaluated retrospectively. Glenoid version (GV), AP diameter (width), and SI diameter (height) on both shoulders were measured on the CT images. Correlations between patient gender, side, age, height, and hand dominance and the GV and size were evaluated. RESULTS: The right shoulder had a mean GV of −0.93 ± 7.80 degrees and the left shoulder had a GV of −0.88 ± 6.63 degrees (p > 0.05). The mean AP diameter of the glenoid was 26.57 ± 3.02 mm in the right shoulder and 26.33 ± 3.01 mm in the left shoulder (p > 0.05). The mean AP diameter of the glenoid was 26.57 ± 3.02 mm in the right shoulder and 26.33 ± 3.01 mm in the left shoulder (p > 0.05). The mean AP diameter of the glenoid was 26.57 ± 3.02 mm in the right shoulder and 26.33 ± 3.01 mm in the left shoulder (p > 0.05). The mean AP diameter of the glenoid was 26.57 ± 3.02 mm in the right shoulder and 26.33 ± 3.01 mm in the left shoulder (p > 0.05). The mean AP diameter of the glenoid was 26.57 ± 3.02 mm in the right shoulder and 26.33 ± 3.01 mm in the left shoulder (p > 0.05). The mean AP diameter of the glenoid was 26.57 ± 3.02 mm in the right shoulder and 26.33 ± 3.01 mm in the left shoulder (p > 0.05). The mean AP diameter of the glenoid was 26.57 ± 3.02 mm in the right shoulder and 26.33 ± 3.01 mm in the left shoulder (p > 0.05). The mean AP diameter of the glenoid was 26.57 ± 3.02 mm in the right shoulder and 26.33 ± 3.01 mm in the left shoulder ( CONCLUSION: Hand dominance had an effect on the glenoid version, while patient gender, age, and height had an effect on the glenoid size. The glenoid width in the Turkish population was similar to that of the European and American populations, and the glenoid height was similar to that of the Asian population. Our GV values were similar to those of the Asian population and more anteverted compared to the Western population. We believe that our findings will be useful in preoperative planning and in the production of implants for our population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7035523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70355232020-02-26 Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population Sarı, Abdulkadir Dinçel, Yaşar Mahsut Günaydın, Burak Çetin, Mehmet Ümit Özçaglayan, Ömer Bilsel, Kerem Biomed Res Int Research Article PURPOSE: In this study, our aim was to evaluate the glenoid version, height, and width measurements based on gender, side, age, height, and hand dominance in the Turkish population using computed tomography (CT) images. METHODS: In our study, CT images of 140 patients (62 females and 78 males; mean age: 39.6 years) who had no shoulder complaints were evaluated retrospectively. Glenoid version (GV), AP diameter (width), and SI diameter (height) on both shoulders were measured on the CT images. Correlations between patient gender, side, age, height, and hand dominance and the GV and size were evaluated. RESULTS: The right shoulder had a mean GV of −0.93 ± 7.80 degrees and the left shoulder had a GV of −0.88 ± 6.63 degrees (p > 0.05). The mean AP diameter of the glenoid was 26.57 ± 3.02 mm in the right shoulder and 26.33 ± 3.01 mm in the left shoulder (p > 0.05). The mean AP diameter of the glenoid was 26.57 ± 3.02 mm in the right shoulder and 26.33 ± 3.01 mm in the left shoulder (p > 0.05). The mean AP diameter of the glenoid was 26.57 ± 3.02 mm in the right shoulder and 26.33 ± 3.01 mm in the left shoulder (p > 0.05). The mean AP diameter of the glenoid was 26.57 ± 3.02 mm in the right shoulder and 26.33 ± 3.01 mm in the left shoulder (p > 0.05). The mean AP diameter of the glenoid was 26.57 ± 3.02 mm in the right shoulder and 26.33 ± 3.01 mm in the left shoulder (p > 0.05). The mean AP diameter of the glenoid was 26.57 ± 3.02 mm in the right shoulder and 26.33 ± 3.01 mm in the left shoulder (p > 0.05). The mean AP diameter of the glenoid was 26.57 ± 3.02 mm in the right shoulder and 26.33 ± 3.01 mm in the left shoulder (p > 0.05). The mean AP diameter of the glenoid was 26.57 ± 3.02 mm in the right shoulder and 26.33 ± 3.01 mm in the left shoulder ( CONCLUSION: Hand dominance had an effect on the glenoid version, while patient gender, age, and height had an effect on the glenoid size. The glenoid width in the Turkish population was similar to that of the European and American populations, and the glenoid height was similar to that of the Asian population. Our GV values were similar to those of the Asian population and more anteverted compared to the Western population. We believe that our findings will be useful in preoperative planning and in the production of implants for our population. Hindawi 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7035523/ /pubmed/32104697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5736136 Text en Copyright © 2020 Abdulkadir Sarı et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sarı, Abdulkadir
Dinçel, Yaşar Mahsut
Günaydın, Burak
Çetin, Mehmet Ümit
Özçaglayan, Ömer
Bilsel, Kerem
Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population
title Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population
title_full Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population
title_fullStr Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population
title_short Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population
title_sort assessment of the glenoid morphology based on demographic data in the turkish population
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7035523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32104697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5736136
work_keys_str_mv AT sarıabdulkadir assessmentoftheglenoidmorphologybasedondemographicdataintheturkishpopulation
AT dincelyasarmahsut assessmentoftheglenoidmorphologybasedondemographicdataintheturkishpopulation
AT gunaydınburak assessmentoftheglenoidmorphologybasedondemographicdataintheturkishpopulation
AT cetinmehmetumit assessmentoftheglenoidmorphologybasedondemographicdataintheturkishpopulation
AT ozcaglayanomer assessmentoftheglenoidmorphologybasedondemographicdataintheturkishpopulation
AT bilselkerem assessmentoftheglenoidmorphologybasedondemographicdataintheturkishpopulation