Cargando…

Differences in pulse rate variability with measurement site

BACKGROUND: Recently, attempts have been made to use the pulse rate variability (PRV) as a surrogate for heart rate variability (HRV). PRV, however, may be caused by the fluctuations of left ventricular pre-ejection period and pulse transit time besides HRV. We examined whether PRV differs not only...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuda, Emi, Yamamoto, Kento, Yoshida, Yutaka, Hayano, Junichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7035641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32085811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40101-020-0214-1
_version_ 1783500094490804224
author Yuda, Emi
Yamamoto, Kento
Yoshida, Yutaka
Hayano, Junichiro
author_facet Yuda, Emi
Yamamoto, Kento
Yoshida, Yutaka
Hayano, Junichiro
author_sort Yuda, Emi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, attempts have been made to use the pulse rate variability (PRV) as a surrogate for heart rate variability (HRV). PRV, however, may be caused by the fluctuations of left ventricular pre-ejection period and pulse transit time besides HRV. We examined whether PRV differs not only from HRV but also depending on the measurement site. RESULTS: In five healthy subjects, pulse waves were measured simultaneously on both wrists and both forearms together with single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in the supine and sitting positions. Although average pulse interval showed no significant difference from average R-R interval in either positions, PRV showed greater power for the low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) components and lower LF/HF than HRV. The deviations of PRV from HRV in the supine and sitting positions were 13.2% and 7.9% for LF power, 24.5% and 18.3% for HF power, and − 15.0% and − 30.2% for LF/HF, respectively. While the average pulse interval showed 0.8% and 0.5% inter-site variations among the four sites in the supine and sitting positions, respectively, the inter-site variations in PRV were 4.0% and 3.6% for LF power, 3.8% and 4.7% for HF power, and 18.0% and 17.5% for LF/HF, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These suggest that PRV shows not only systemic differences from HRV but also considerable inter-site variations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7035641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70356412020-02-27 Differences in pulse rate variability with measurement site Yuda, Emi Yamamoto, Kento Yoshida, Yutaka Hayano, Junichiro J Physiol Anthropol Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Recently, attempts have been made to use the pulse rate variability (PRV) as a surrogate for heart rate variability (HRV). PRV, however, may be caused by the fluctuations of left ventricular pre-ejection period and pulse transit time besides HRV. We examined whether PRV differs not only from HRV but also depending on the measurement site. RESULTS: In five healthy subjects, pulse waves were measured simultaneously on both wrists and both forearms together with single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in the supine and sitting positions. Although average pulse interval showed no significant difference from average R-R interval in either positions, PRV showed greater power for the low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) components and lower LF/HF than HRV. The deviations of PRV from HRV in the supine and sitting positions were 13.2% and 7.9% for LF power, 24.5% and 18.3% for HF power, and − 15.0% and − 30.2% for LF/HF, respectively. While the average pulse interval showed 0.8% and 0.5% inter-site variations among the four sites in the supine and sitting positions, respectively, the inter-site variations in PRV were 4.0% and 3.6% for LF power, 3.8% and 4.7% for HF power, and 18.0% and 17.5% for LF/HF, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These suggest that PRV shows not only systemic differences from HRV but also considerable inter-site variations. BioMed Central 2020-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7035641/ /pubmed/32085811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40101-020-0214-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Yuda, Emi
Yamamoto, Kento
Yoshida, Yutaka
Hayano, Junichiro
Differences in pulse rate variability with measurement site
title Differences in pulse rate variability with measurement site
title_full Differences in pulse rate variability with measurement site
title_fullStr Differences in pulse rate variability with measurement site
title_full_unstemmed Differences in pulse rate variability with measurement site
title_short Differences in pulse rate variability with measurement site
title_sort differences in pulse rate variability with measurement site
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7035641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32085811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40101-020-0214-1
work_keys_str_mv AT yudaemi differencesinpulseratevariabilitywithmeasurementsite
AT yamamotokento differencesinpulseratevariabilitywithmeasurementsite
AT yoshidayutaka differencesinpulseratevariabilitywithmeasurementsite
AT hayanojunichiro differencesinpulseratevariabilitywithmeasurementsite