Cargando…
Differences in pulse rate variability with measurement site
BACKGROUND: Recently, attempts have been made to use the pulse rate variability (PRV) as a surrogate for heart rate variability (HRV). PRV, however, may be caused by the fluctuations of left ventricular pre-ejection period and pulse transit time besides HRV. We examined whether PRV differs not only...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7035641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32085811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40101-020-0214-1 |
_version_ | 1783500094490804224 |
---|---|
author | Yuda, Emi Yamamoto, Kento Yoshida, Yutaka Hayano, Junichiro |
author_facet | Yuda, Emi Yamamoto, Kento Yoshida, Yutaka Hayano, Junichiro |
author_sort | Yuda, Emi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recently, attempts have been made to use the pulse rate variability (PRV) as a surrogate for heart rate variability (HRV). PRV, however, may be caused by the fluctuations of left ventricular pre-ejection period and pulse transit time besides HRV. We examined whether PRV differs not only from HRV but also depending on the measurement site. RESULTS: In five healthy subjects, pulse waves were measured simultaneously on both wrists and both forearms together with single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in the supine and sitting positions. Although average pulse interval showed no significant difference from average R-R interval in either positions, PRV showed greater power for the low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) components and lower LF/HF than HRV. The deviations of PRV from HRV in the supine and sitting positions were 13.2% and 7.9% for LF power, 24.5% and 18.3% for HF power, and − 15.0% and − 30.2% for LF/HF, respectively. While the average pulse interval showed 0.8% and 0.5% inter-site variations among the four sites in the supine and sitting positions, respectively, the inter-site variations in PRV were 4.0% and 3.6% for LF power, 3.8% and 4.7% for HF power, and 18.0% and 17.5% for LF/HF, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These suggest that PRV shows not only systemic differences from HRV but also considerable inter-site variations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7035641 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70356412020-02-27 Differences in pulse rate variability with measurement site Yuda, Emi Yamamoto, Kento Yoshida, Yutaka Hayano, Junichiro J Physiol Anthropol Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Recently, attempts have been made to use the pulse rate variability (PRV) as a surrogate for heart rate variability (HRV). PRV, however, may be caused by the fluctuations of left ventricular pre-ejection period and pulse transit time besides HRV. We examined whether PRV differs not only from HRV but also depending on the measurement site. RESULTS: In five healthy subjects, pulse waves were measured simultaneously on both wrists and both forearms together with single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in the supine and sitting positions. Although average pulse interval showed no significant difference from average R-R interval in either positions, PRV showed greater power for the low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) components and lower LF/HF than HRV. The deviations of PRV from HRV in the supine and sitting positions were 13.2% and 7.9% for LF power, 24.5% and 18.3% for HF power, and − 15.0% and − 30.2% for LF/HF, respectively. While the average pulse interval showed 0.8% and 0.5% inter-site variations among the four sites in the supine and sitting positions, respectively, the inter-site variations in PRV were 4.0% and 3.6% for LF power, 3.8% and 4.7% for HF power, and 18.0% and 17.5% for LF/HF, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These suggest that PRV shows not only systemic differences from HRV but also considerable inter-site variations. BioMed Central 2020-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7035641/ /pubmed/32085811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40101-020-0214-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Yuda, Emi Yamamoto, Kento Yoshida, Yutaka Hayano, Junichiro Differences in pulse rate variability with measurement site |
title | Differences in pulse rate variability with measurement site |
title_full | Differences in pulse rate variability with measurement site |
title_fullStr | Differences in pulse rate variability with measurement site |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in pulse rate variability with measurement site |
title_short | Differences in pulse rate variability with measurement site |
title_sort | differences in pulse rate variability with measurement site |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7035641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32085811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40101-020-0214-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yudaemi differencesinpulseratevariabilitywithmeasurementsite AT yamamotokento differencesinpulseratevariabilitywithmeasurementsite AT yoshidayutaka differencesinpulseratevariabilitywithmeasurementsite AT hayanojunichiro differencesinpulseratevariabilitywithmeasurementsite |