Cargando…

Proposed pathway for patients undergoing enhanced recovery after spinal surgery: protocol for a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The best evidence-enhanced recovery care pathway is yet to be defined for patients undergoing spinal surgery. Minimally invasive surgery, multimodal analgesia, early mobilization, and early postoperative nutrition have been considered as critical components of enhanced recovery in spinal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Licina, Ana, Silvers, Andrew, Laughlin, Harry, Russell, Jeremy, Wan, Crispin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7035675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32085813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-1283-2
_version_ 1783500102470467584
author Licina, Ana
Silvers, Andrew
Laughlin, Harry
Russell, Jeremy
Wan, Crispin
author_facet Licina, Ana
Silvers, Andrew
Laughlin, Harry
Russell, Jeremy
Wan, Crispin
author_sort Licina, Ana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The best evidence-enhanced recovery care pathway is yet to be defined for patients undergoing spinal surgery. Minimally invasive surgery, multimodal analgesia, early mobilization, and early postoperative nutrition have been considered as critical components of enhanced recovery in spinal surgery (ERSS). The objective of this study will be to synthesize the evidence underpinning individual components of a proposed multidisciplinary enhanced recovery pathway for patients undergoing spinal surgery. METHODS: This is the study protocol for a systematic review of complex interventions. Our team identified 22 individual care components of a proposed pathway based on clinical practice guidelines and published reviews. We will include systematic reviews and meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and observational studies in adults or pediatric patients evaluating any one of the pre-determined care components. Our primary outcomes will be all-cause mortality, morbidity outcomes (e.g., pulmonary, cardiac, renal, surgical complications), patient-reported outcomes and experiences (e.g., pain, quality of care experience), and health services outcomes (e.g., length of stay and costs). We will search the following databases (1990 onwards) MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CENTRAL). Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. The risk of bias for individual studies will be appraised using appropriate tools. A narrative synthesis will be provided with the information presented in the text and tables to summarize and explain the characteristics and findings of the included studies. Due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, we do not anticipate to conduct meta-analyses. Confidence in cumulative evidence for each component of care will be classified according to the GRADE system. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will identify, evaluate, and integrate the evidence underpinning individual components of a pathway for patients undergoing spinal surgery. The formation of an evidence-based pathway will allow for the standardization of clinical care delivery within the context of enhanced recovery in spinal surgery. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019135289
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7035675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70356752020-02-27 Proposed pathway for patients undergoing enhanced recovery after spinal surgery: protocol for a systematic review Licina, Ana Silvers, Andrew Laughlin, Harry Russell, Jeremy Wan, Crispin Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: The best evidence-enhanced recovery care pathway is yet to be defined for patients undergoing spinal surgery. Minimally invasive surgery, multimodal analgesia, early mobilization, and early postoperative nutrition have been considered as critical components of enhanced recovery in spinal surgery (ERSS). The objective of this study will be to synthesize the evidence underpinning individual components of a proposed multidisciplinary enhanced recovery pathway for patients undergoing spinal surgery. METHODS: This is the study protocol for a systematic review of complex interventions. Our team identified 22 individual care components of a proposed pathway based on clinical practice guidelines and published reviews. We will include systematic reviews and meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and observational studies in adults or pediatric patients evaluating any one of the pre-determined care components. Our primary outcomes will be all-cause mortality, morbidity outcomes (e.g., pulmonary, cardiac, renal, surgical complications), patient-reported outcomes and experiences (e.g., pain, quality of care experience), and health services outcomes (e.g., length of stay and costs). We will search the following databases (1990 onwards) MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CENTRAL). Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. The risk of bias for individual studies will be appraised using appropriate tools. A narrative synthesis will be provided with the information presented in the text and tables to summarize and explain the characteristics and findings of the included studies. Due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, we do not anticipate to conduct meta-analyses. Confidence in cumulative evidence for each component of care will be classified according to the GRADE system. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will identify, evaluate, and integrate the evidence underpinning individual components of a pathway for patients undergoing spinal surgery. The formation of an evidence-based pathway will allow for the standardization of clinical care delivery within the context of enhanced recovery in spinal surgery. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019135289 BioMed Central 2020-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7035675/ /pubmed/32085813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-1283-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Licina, Ana
Silvers, Andrew
Laughlin, Harry
Russell, Jeremy
Wan, Crispin
Proposed pathway for patients undergoing enhanced recovery after spinal surgery: protocol for a systematic review
title Proposed pathway for patients undergoing enhanced recovery after spinal surgery: protocol for a systematic review
title_full Proposed pathway for patients undergoing enhanced recovery after spinal surgery: protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr Proposed pathway for patients undergoing enhanced recovery after spinal surgery: protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Proposed pathway for patients undergoing enhanced recovery after spinal surgery: protocol for a systematic review
title_short Proposed pathway for patients undergoing enhanced recovery after spinal surgery: protocol for a systematic review
title_sort proposed pathway for patients undergoing enhanced recovery after spinal surgery: protocol for a systematic review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7035675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32085813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-1283-2
work_keys_str_mv AT licinaana proposedpathwayforpatientsundergoingenhancedrecoveryafterspinalsurgeryprotocolforasystematicreview
AT silversandrew proposedpathwayforpatientsundergoingenhancedrecoveryafterspinalsurgeryprotocolforasystematicreview
AT laughlinharry proposedpathwayforpatientsundergoingenhancedrecoveryafterspinalsurgeryprotocolforasystematicreview
AT russelljeremy proposedpathwayforpatientsundergoingenhancedrecoveryafterspinalsurgeryprotocolforasystematicreview
AT wancrispin proposedpathwayforpatientsundergoingenhancedrecoveryafterspinalsurgeryprotocolforasystematicreview