Cargando…

Challenges in turning a great idea into great health policy: the case of integrated care

BACKGROUND: In the organization of health care and health care systems, there is an increasing trend towards integrated care. Policy-makers from different countries are creating policies intended to promote cooperation and collaboration between health care providers, while facilitating the integrati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raus, Kasper, Mortier, Eric, Eeckloo, Kristof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7035709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32085770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4950-z
_version_ 1783500110417625088
author Raus, Kasper
Mortier, Eric
Eeckloo, Kristof
author_facet Raus, Kasper
Mortier, Eric
Eeckloo, Kristof
author_sort Raus, Kasper
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the organization of health care and health care systems, there is an increasing trend towards integrated care. Policy-makers from different countries are creating policies intended to promote cooperation and collaboration between health care providers, while facilitating the integration of different health care services. Hopes are high, as such collaboration and integration of care are believed to save resources and improve quality. However, policy-makers are likely to encounter various challenges and limitations when attempting to turn these great ideas into effective policies. In this paper, we look into these challenges. MAIN BODY: We argue that the organization of health care and integrated care is of public concern, and should thus be of crucial interest to policy-makers. We highlight three challenges or limitations likely to be encountered by policy-makers in integrated care. These are: (1) conceptual challenges; (2) empirical/methodological challenges; and (3) resource challenges. We will argue that it is still unclear what integrated care means and how we should measure it. ‘Integrated care’ is a single label that can refer to a great number of different processes. It can describe the integration of care for individual patients, the integration of services aimed at particular patient groups or particular conditions, or it can refer to institution-wide collaborations between different health care providers. We subsequently argue that health reform inevitably possesses a political context that should be taken into account. We also show how evidence supporting integrated care may not guarantee success in every context. Finally, we will discuss how promoting collaboration and integration might actually demand more resources. In the final section, we look at three different paradigmatic examples of integrated care policy: Norway, the UK’s NHS, and Belgium. CONCLUSIONS: There seems widespread agreement that collaboration and integration are the way forward for health care and health care systems. Nevertheless, we argue that policy-makers should remain careful; they should carefully consider what they hope to achieve, the amount of resources they are willing to invest, and how they will evaluate the success of their policy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7035709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70357092020-03-02 Challenges in turning a great idea into great health policy: the case of integrated care Raus, Kasper Mortier, Eric Eeckloo, Kristof BMC Health Serv Res Debate BACKGROUND: In the organization of health care and health care systems, there is an increasing trend towards integrated care. Policy-makers from different countries are creating policies intended to promote cooperation and collaboration between health care providers, while facilitating the integration of different health care services. Hopes are high, as such collaboration and integration of care are believed to save resources and improve quality. However, policy-makers are likely to encounter various challenges and limitations when attempting to turn these great ideas into effective policies. In this paper, we look into these challenges. MAIN BODY: We argue that the organization of health care and integrated care is of public concern, and should thus be of crucial interest to policy-makers. We highlight three challenges or limitations likely to be encountered by policy-makers in integrated care. These are: (1) conceptual challenges; (2) empirical/methodological challenges; and (3) resource challenges. We will argue that it is still unclear what integrated care means and how we should measure it. ‘Integrated care’ is a single label that can refer to a great number of different processes. It can describe the integration of care for individual patients, the integration of services aimed at particular patient groups or particular conditions, or it can refer to institution-wide collaborations between different health care providers. We subsequently argue that health reform inevitably possesses a political context that should be taken into account. We also show how evidence supporting integrated care may not guarantee success in every context. Finally, we will discuss how promoting collaboration and integration might actually demand more resources. In the final section, we look at three different paradigmatic examples of integrated care policy: Norway, the UK’s NHS, and Belgium. CONCLUSIONS: There seems widespread agreement that collaboration and integration are the way forward for health care and health care systems. Nevertheless, we argue that policy-makers should remain careful; they should carefully consider what they hope to achieve, the amount of resources they are willing to invest, and how they will evaluate the success of their policy. BioMed Central 2020-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7035709/ /pubmed/32085770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4950-z Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Raus, Kasper
Mortier, Eric
Eeckloo, Kristof
Challenges in turning a great idea into great health policy: the case of integrated care
title Challenges in turning a great idea into great health policy: the case of integrated care
title_full Challenges in turning a great idea into great health policy: the case of integrated care
title_fullStr Challenges in turning a great idea into great health policy: the case of integrated care
title_full_unstemmed Challenges in turning a great idea into great health policy: the case of integrated care
title_short Challenges in turning a great idea into great health policy: the case of integrated care
title_sort challenges in turning a great idea into great health policy: the case of integrated care
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7035709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32085770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4950-z
work_keys_str_mv AT rauskasper challengesinturningagreatideaintogreathealthpolicythecaseofintegratedcare
AT mortiereric challengesinturningagreatideaintogreathealthpolicythecaseofintegratedcare
AT eecklookristof challengesinturningagreatideaintogreathealthpolicythecaseofintegratedcare