Cargando…

Residents Take the Lead: A Modern Collaborative Approach to Research During Residency

BACKGROUND: Participation in scholarship is a requirement for Internal Medicine (IM) residencies, but programs struggle to successfully integrate research into busy clinical schedules. In 2013, the IM residency at Brigham and Women’s Hospital implemented the Housestaff Research Project (HRP)— a nove...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atalay, Alev J, Ard, Kevin, Bethea, Emily, Christopher, Kenneth B, Yialamas, Maria A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7035905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32110132
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S238221
_version_ 1783500136594276352
author Atalay, Alev J
Ard, Kevin
Bethea, Emily
Christopher, Kenneth B
Yialamas, Maria A
author_facet Atalay, Alev J
Ard, Kevin
Bethea, Emily
Christopher, Kenneth B
Yialamas, Maria A
author_sort Atalay, Alev J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Participation in scholarship is a requirement for Internal Medicine (IM) residencies, but programs struggle to successfully integrate research into busy clinical schedules. In 2013, the IM residency at Brigham and Women’s Hospital implemented the Housestaff Research Project (HRP)— a novel residency-wide research initiative designed to facilitate participation in scholarship. The HRP had two components—a formal research curriculum and an infrastructure that provided funding and mentorship for resident-led, housestaff wide projects. METHODS: This is a mixed-methods study of 190 IM residents and two HRP-supported research projects. Seventy-seven residents responded to an electronic survey about their interests in research exposure in residency. Fifty-six residents responded to an electronic survey about their participation in the HRP. The success of HRP-supported projects was evaluated through resident comments, interviews with three residents leading the first two HRPs and a description of the success of the projects based on resident involvement and dissemination of the results. RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent (n= 67/77) of residents were interested in additional research exposure during residency. Ninety-five percent (n = 53/56) of residents had heard of the HRP, and 77% had participate in at least one aspect of it. Approximately 20 residents were directly involved in the two resident-led projects. HRP-supported projects resulted in presentations at three local and three national conferences, one manuscript in press, and one manuscript in preparation. The resident project leaders felt that a strength and unique aspect of the HRP was the collaboration with co-residents. CONCLUSION: The HRP successfully created a culture of research and scholarship within the residency. The HRP leaders and residents that participated in HRP-supported projects expressed the most direct benefits from the program. All residents were exposed to research concepts and methods. Future directions for the HRP include selecting projects that maximize the number of resident participants and integrating a more robust research curriculum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7035905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70359052020-02-27 Residents Take the Lead: A Modern Collaborative Approach to Research During Residency Atalay, Alev J Ard, Kevin Bethea, Emily Christopher, Kenneth B Yialamas, Maria A Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research BACKGROUND: Participation in scholarship is a requirement for Internal Medicine (IM) residencies, but programs struggle to successfully integrate research into busy clinical schedules. In 2013, the IM residency at Brigham and Women’s Hospital implemented the Housestaff Research Project (HRP)— a novel residency-wide research initiative designed to facilitate participation in scholarship. The HRP had two components—a formal research curriculum and an infrastructure that provided funding and mentorship for resident-led, housestaff wide projects. METHODS: This is a mixed-methods study of 190 IM residents and two HRP-supported research projects. Seventy-seven residents responded to an electronic survey about their interests in research exposure in residency. Fifty-six residents responded to an electronic survey about their participation in the HRP. The success of HRP-supported projects was evaluated through resident comments, interviews with three residents leading the first two HRPs and a description of the success of the projects based on resident involvement and dissemination of the results. RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent (n= 67/77) of residents were interested in additional research exposure during residency. Ninety-five percent (n = 53/56) of residents had heard of the HRP, and 77% had participate in at least one aspect of it. Approximately 20 residents were directly involved in the two resident-led projects. HRP-supported projects resulted in presentations at three local and three national conferences, one manuscript in press, and one manuscript in preparation. The resident project leaders felt that a strength and unique aspect of the HRP was the collaboration with co-residents. CONCLUSION: The HRP successfully created a culture of research and scholarship within the residency. The HRP leaders and residents that participated in HRP-supported projects expressed the most direct benefits from the program. All residents were exposed to research concepts and methods. Future directions for the HRP include selecting projects that maximize the number of resident participants and integrating a more robust research curriculum. Dove 2020-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7035905/ /pubmed/32110132 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S238221 Text en © 2020 Atalay et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Atalay, Alev J
Ard, Kevin
Bethea, Emily
Christopher, Kenneth B
Yialamas, Maria A
Residents Take the Lead: A Modern Collaborative Approach to Research During Residency
title Residents Take the Lead: A Modern Collaborative Approach to Research During Residency
title_full Residents Take the Lead: A Modern Collaborative Approach to Research During Residency
title_fullStr Residents Take the Lead: A Modern Collaborative Approach to Research During Residency
title_full_unstemmed Residents Take the Lead: A Modern Collaborative Approach to Research During Residency
title_short Residents Take the Lead: A Modern Collaborative Approach to Research During Residency
title_sort residents take the lead: a modern collaborative approach to research during residency
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7035905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32110132
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S238221
work_keys_str_mv AT atalayalevj residentstaketheleadamoderncollaborativeapproachtoresearchduringresidency
AT ardkevin residentstaketheleadamoderncollaborativeapproachtoresearchduringresidency
AT betheaemily residentstaketheleadamoderncollaborativeapproachtoresearchduringresidency
AT christopherkennethb residentstaketheleadamoderncollaborativeapproachtoresearchduringresidency
AT yialamasmariaa residentstaketheleadamoderncollaborativeapproachtoresearchduringresidency