Cargando…

State of the art: leadless ventricular pacing: A national expert consensus of the Austrian Society of Cardiology

BACKGROUND: Cardiac pacing has been shown to improve quality of life and prognosis of patients with bradycardia for almost 60 years. The latest innovation in pacemaker therapy was miniaturization of generators to allow leadless pacing directly in the right ventricle. There is a long history and exte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steinwender, C., Lercher, P., Schukro, C., Blessberger, H., Prenner, G., Andreas, M., Kraus, J., Ammer, M., Stühlinger, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7036055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31863250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00680-2
_version_ 1783500145192599552
author Steinwender, C.
Lercher, P.
Schukro, C.
Blessberger, H.
Prenner, G.
Andreas, M.
Kraus, J.
Ammer, M.
Stühlinger, M.
author_facet Steinwender, C.
Lercher, P.
Schukro, C.
Blessberger, H.
Prenner, G.
Andreas, M.
Kraus, J.
Ammer, M.
Stühlinger, M.
author_sort Steinwender, C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiac pacing has been shown to improve quality of life and prognosis of patients with bradycardia for almost 60 years. The latest innovation in pacemaker therapy was miniaturization of generators to allow leadless pacing directly in the right ventricle. There is a long history and extensive experience of leadless ventricular pacing in Austria. However, no recommendations of national or international societies for indications and implantation of leadless opposed to transvenous pacing systems have been published so far. RESULTS: A national expert panel of skilled implanters gives an overview on the two utilized leadless cardiac pacing systems and highlights clinical advantages as well as current knowledge of performance and complication rates of leadless pacing. Furthermore, a national consensus for Austria is presented, based on recent studies and current know-how, specifically including indications for leadless pacing, management of infection, suggestions for qualification, and training of the operators and technical standards. CONCLUSIONS: Leadless pacing systems can be implanted successfully with a low complication rate, if suggestions for indications and technical requirements are followed. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: An overview of the two utilized leadless cardiac pacing systems is given, specifically highlighting clinical advantages as well as current knowledge of performance and complication rates. Furthermore, a national consensus for Austria is presented, specifically including indications for leadless pacing, management of infection, and suggestions for qualification and technical standards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7036055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70360552020-03-06 State of the art: leadless ventricular pacing: A national expert consensus of the Austrian Society of Cardiology Steinwender, C. Lercher, P. Schukro, C. Blessberger, H. Prenner, G. Andreas, M. Kraus, J. Ammer, M. Stühlinger, M. J Interv Card Electrophysiol Article BACKGROUND: Cardiac pacing has been shown to improve quality of life and prognosis of patients with bradycardia for almost 60 years. The latest innovation in pacemaker therapy was miniaturization of generators to allow leadless pacing directly in the right ventricle. There is a long history and extensive experience of leadless ventricular pacing in Austria. However, no recommendations of national or international societies for indications and implantation of leadless opposed to transvenous pacing systems have been published so far. RESULTS: A national expert panel of skilled implanters gives an overview on the two utilized leadless cardiac pacing systems and highlights clinical advantages as well as current knowledge of performance and complication rates of leadless pacing. Furthermore, a national consensus for Austria is presented, based on recent studies and current know-how, specifically including indications for leadless pacing, management of infection, suggestions for qualification, and training of the operators and technical standards. CONCLUSIONS: Leadless pacing systems can be implanted successfully with a low complication rate, if suggestions for indications and technical requirements are followed. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: An overview of the two utilized leadless cardiac pacing systems is given, specifically highlighting clinical advantages as well as current knowledge of performance and complication rates. Furthermore, a national consensus for Austria is presented, specifically including indications for leadless pacing, management of infection, and suggestions for qualification and technical standards. Springer US 2019-12-20 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7036055/ /pubmed/31863250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00680-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Steinwender, C.
Lercher, P.
Schukro, C.
Blessberger, H.
Prenner, G.
Andreas, M.
Kraus, J.
Ammer, M.
Stühlinger, M.
State of the art: leadless ventricular pacing: A national expert consensus of the Austrian Society of Cardiology
title State of the art: leadless ventricular pacing: A national expert consensus of the Austrian Society of Cardiology
title_full State of the art: leadless ventricular pacing: A national expert consensus of the Austrian Society of Cardiology
title_fullStr State of the art: leadless ventricular pacing: A national expert consensus of the Austrian Society of Cardiology
title_full_unstemmed State of the art: leadless ventricular pacing: A national expert consensus of the Austrian Society of Cardiology
title_short State of the art: leadless ventricular pacing: A national expert consensus of the Austrian Society of Cardiology
title_sort state of the art: leadless ventricular pacing: a national expert consensus of the austrian society of cardiology
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7036055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31863250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00680-2
work_keys_str_mv AT steinwenderc stateoftheartleadlessventricularpacinganationalexpertconsensusoftheaustriansocietyofcardiology
AT lercherp stateoftheartleadlessventricularpacinganationalexpertconsensusoftheaustriansocietyofcardiology
AT schukroc stateoftheartleadlessventricularpacinganationalexpertconsensusoftheaustriansocietyofcardiology
AT blessbergerh stateoftheartleadlessventricularpacinganationalexpertconsensusoftheaustriansocietyofcardiology
AT prennerg stateoftheartleadlessventricularpacinganationalexpertconsensusoftheaustriansocietyofcardiology
AT andreasm stateoftheartleadlessventricularpacinganationalexpertconsensusoftheaustriansocietyofcardiology
AT krausj stateoftheartleadlessventricularpacinganationalexpertconsensusoftheaustriansocietyofcardiology
AT ammerm stateoftheartleadlessventricularpacinganationalexpertconsensusoftheaustriansocietyofcardiology
AT stuhlingerm stateoftheartleadlessventricularpacinganationalexpertconsensusoftheaustriansocietyofcardiology