Cargando…

Have e-cigarettes renormalised or displaced youth smoking? Results of a segmented regression analysis of repeated cross sectional survey data in England, Scotland and Wales

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether during a period of limited e-cigarette regulation and rapid growth in their use, smoking began to become renormalised among young people. DESIGN: Interrupted time-series analysis of repeated cross-sectional time-series data. SETTING: Great Britain PARTICIPANTS: 248 324...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hallingberg, Britt, Maynard, Olivia M, Bauld, Linda, Brown, Rachel, Gray, Linsay, Lowthian, Emily, MacKintosh, Anne-Marie, Moore, Laurence, Munafo, Marcus R, Moore, Graham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7036293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30936390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054584
_version_ 1783500196772052992
author Hallingberg, Britt
Maynard, Olivia M
Bauld, Linda
Brown, Rachel
Gray, Linsay
Lowthian, Emily
MacKintosh, Anne-Marie
Moore, Laurence
Munafo, Marcus R
Moore, Graham
author_facet Hallingberg, Britt
Maynard, Olivia M
Bauld, Linda
Brown, Rachel
Gray, Linsay
Lowthian, Emily
MacKintosh, Anne-Marie
Moore, Laurence
Munafo, Marcus R
Moore, Graham
author_sort Hallingberg, Britt
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To examine whether during a period of limited e-cigarette regulation and rapid growth in their use, smoking began to become renormalised among young people. DESIGN: Interrupted time-series analysis of repeated cross-sectional time-series data. SETTING: Great Britain PARTICIPANTS: 248 324 young people aged approximately 13 and 15 years, from three national surveys during the years 1998–2015. INTERVENTION: Unregulated growth of e-cigarette use (following the year 2010, until 2015). OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were prevalence of self-reported ever smoking and regular smoking. Secondary outcomes were attitudes towards smoking. Tertiary outcomes were ever use of cannabis and alcohol. RESULTS: In final models, no significant change was detected in the pre-existing trend for ever smoking (OR 1.01, CI 0.99 to 1.03). There was a marginally significant slowing in the rate of decline for regular smoking (OR 1.04, CI 1.00 to 1.08), accompanied by a larger slowing in the rate of decline of cannabis use (OR 1.21, CI 1.18 to 1.25) and alcohol use (OR 1.17, CI 1.14 to 1.19). In all models and subgroup analyses for smoking attitudes, an increased rate of decline was observed after 2010 (OR 0.88, CI 0.86 to 0.90). Models were robust to sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: There was a marginal slowing in the decline in regular smoking during the period following 2010, when e-cigarettes were emerging but relatively unregulated. However, these patterns were not unique to tobacco use and the decline in the acceptability of smoking behaviour among youth accelerated during this time. These analyses provide little evidence that renormalisation of youth smoking was occurring during a period of rapid growth and limited regulation of e-cigarettes from 2011 to 2015. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Research registry number: researchregistry4336
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7036293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70362932020-03-01 Have e-cigarettes renormalised or displaced youth smoking? Results of a segmented regression analysis of repeated cross sectional survey data in England, Scotland and Wales Hallingberg, Britt Maynard, Olivia M Bauld, Linda Brown, Rachel Gray, Linsay Lowthian, Emily MacKintosh, Anne-Marie Moore, Laurence Munafo, Marcus R Moore, Graham Tob Control Original Research OBJECTIVES: To examine whether during a period of limited e-cigarette regulation and rapid growth in their use, smoking began to become renormalised among young people. DESIGN: Interrupted time-series analysis of repeated cross-sectional time-series data. SETTING: Great Britain PARTICIPANTS: 248 324 young people aged approximately 13 and 15 years, from three national surveys during the years 1998–2015. INTERVENTION: Unregulated growth of e-cigarette use (following the year 2010, until 2015). OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were prevalence of self-reported ever smoking and regular smoking. Secondary outcomes were attitudes towards smoking. Tertiary outcomes were ever use of cannabis and alcohol. RESULTS: In final models, no significant change was detected in the pre-existing trend for ever smoking (OR 1.01, CI 0.99 to 1.03). There was a marginally significant slowing in the rate of decline for regular smoking (OR 1.04, CI 1.00 to 1.08), accompanied by a larger slowing in the rate of decline of cannabis use (OR 1.21, CI 1.18 to 1.25) and alcohol use (OR 1.17, CI 1.14 to 1.19). In all models and subgroup analyses for smoking attitudes, an increased rate of decline was observed after 2010 (OR 0.88, CI 0.86 to 0.90). Models were robust to sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: There was a marginal slowing in the decline in regular smoking during the period following 2010, when e-cigarettes were emerging but relatively unregulated. However, these patterns were not unique to tobacco use and the decline in the acceptability of smoking behaviour among youth accelerated during this time. These analyses provide little evidence that renormalisation of youth smoking was occurring during a period of rapid growth and limited regulation of e-cigarettes from 2011 to 2015. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Research registry number: researchregistry4336 BMJ Publishing Group 2020-03 2019-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7036293/ /pubmed/30936390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054584 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hallingberg, Britt
Maynard, Olivia M
Bauld, Linda
Brown, Rachel
Gray, Linsay
Lowthian, Emily
MacKintosh, Anne-Marie
Moore, Laurence
Munafo, Marcus R
Moore, Graham
Have e-cigarettes renormalised or displaced youth smoking? Results of a segmented regression analysis of repeated cross sectional survey data in England, Scotland and Wales
title Have e-cigarettes renormalised or displaced youth smoking? Results of a segmented regression analysis of repeated cross sectional survey data in England, Scotland and Wales
title_full Have e-cigarettes renormalised or displaced youth smoking? Results of a segmented regression analysis of repeated cross sectional survey data in England, Scotland and Wales
title_fullStr Have e-cigarettes renormalised or displaced youth smoking? Results of a segmented regression analysis of repeated cross sectional survey data in England, Scotland and Wales
title_full_unstemmed Have e-cigarettes renormalised or displaced youth smoking? Results of a segmented regression analysis of repeated cross sectional survey data in England, Scotland and Wales
title_short Have e-cigarettes renormalised or displaced youth smoking? Results of a segmented regression analysis of repeated cross sectional survey data in England, Scotland and Wales
title_sort have e-cigarettes renormalised or displaced youth smoking? results of a segmented regression analysis of repeated cross sectional survey data in england, scotland and wales
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7036293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30936390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054584
work_keys_str_mv AT hallingbergbritt haveecigarettesrenormalisedordisplacedyouthsmokingresultsofasegmentedregressionanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveydatainenglandscotlandandwales
AT maynardoliviam haveecigarettesrenormalisedordisplacedyouthsmokingresultsofasegmentedregressionanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveydatainenglandscotlandandwales
AT bauldlinda haveecigarettesrenormalisedordisplacedyouthsmokingresultsofasegmentedregressionanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveydatainenglandscotlandandwales
AT brownrachel haveecigarettesrenormalisedordisplacedyouthsmokingresultsofasegmentedregressionanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveydatainenglandscotlandandwales
AT graylinsay haveecigarettesrenormalisedordisplacedyouthsmokingresultsofasegmentedregressionanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveydatainenglandscotlandandwales
AT lowthianemily haveecigarettesrenormalisedordisplacedyouthsmokingresultsofasegmentedregressionanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveydatainenglandscotlandandwales
AT mackintoshannemarie haveecigarettesrenormalisedordisplacedyouthsmokingresultsofasegmentedregressionanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveydatainenglandscotlandandwales
AT moorelaurence haveecigarettesrenormalisedordisplacedyouthsmokingresultsofasegmentedregressionanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveydatainenglandscotlandandwales
AT munafomarcusr haveecigarettesrenormalisedordisplacedyouthsmokingresultsofasegmentedregressionanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveydatainenglandscotlandandwales
AT mooregraham haveecigarettesrenormalisedordisplacedyouthsmokingresultsofasegmentedregressionanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveydatainenglandscotlandandwales