Cargando…

Knoop Hardness of Self-Etch Adhesives Applied on Superficial and Deep Dentin

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Low pH of self-etch adhesives might cause suboptimal polymerization. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of dentin depth (deep and superficial) on polymerization efficacy of two self-etch adhesives, with different pH by means of Knoop hardness test. MATERIALS A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Firouzmandi, Maryam, Khashaei, Shideh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7036347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32158783
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.77805.0
_version_ 1783500204811485184
author Firouzmandi, Maryam
Khashaei, Shideh
author_facet Firouzmandi, Maryam
Khashaei, Shideh
author_sort Firouzmandi, Maryam
collection PubMed
description STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Low pH of self-etch adhesives might cause suboptimal polymerization. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of dentin depth (deep and superficial) on polymerization efficacy of two self-etch adhesives, with different pH by means of Knoop hardness test. MATERIALS AND METHOD: In this in vitro study, sixty sound molars were used to prepare 30 superficial dentin and 30 deep dentin specimens. Dentin specimens of each depth were randomly distributed into two equal subgroups (N=15) and bonded by either Adper Prompt L-Pop (strong self-etch adhesive) or Adper Easy Bond (mild self-etch adhesive). Knoop hardness test was employed to evaluate degree of cross-linking of the adhesives. Data were analyzed with SPSS 16, using two-way ANOVA to compare mean hardness values of the study groups (p< 0.05). RESULTS: There was no interaction effect between dentin depth and the type of adhesive (p= 0.36). Regardless of dentin depth, hardness of Adper Easy Bond was significantly higher than that of Adper Prompt L-pop (p< 0.001). Moreover, both the adhesives showed higher hardness when bonded to superficial dentin compared to deep dentin (p< 0.001). CONCLUSION: Degree of cross-linking of the self-etch adhesive with mild acidity was more than that of the strong self-etch adhesive after light-curing. Surface hardness of both adhesives was higher on superficial dentin compared to deep dentin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7036347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70363472020-03-11 Knoop Hardness of Self-Etch Adhesives Applied on Superficial and Deep Dentin Firouzmandi, Maryam Khashaei, Shideh J Dent (Shiraz) Original Article STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Low pH of self-etch adhesives might cause suboptimal polymerization. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of dentin depth (deep and superficial) on polymerization efficacy of two self-etch adhesives, with different pH by means of Knoop hardness test. MATERIALS AND METHOD: In this in vitro study, sixty sound molars were used to prepare 30 superficial dentin and 30 deep dentin specimens. Dentin specimens of each depth were randomly distributed into two equal subgroups (N=15) and bonded by either Adper Prompt L-Pop (strong self-etch adhesive) or Adper Easy Bond (mild self-etch adhesive). Knoop hardness test was employed to evaluate degree of cross-linking of the adhesives. Data were analyzed with SPSS 16, using two-way ANOVA to compare mean hardness values of the study groups (p< 0.05). RESULTS: There was no interaction effect between dentin depth and the type of adhesive (p= 0.36). Regardless of dentin depth, hardness of Adper Easy Bond was significantly higher than that of Adper Prompt L-pop (p< 0.001). Moreover, both the adhesives showed higher hardness when bonded to superficial dentin compared to deep dentin (p< 0.001). CONCLUSION: Degree of cross-linking of the self-etch adhesive with mild acidity was more than that of the strong self-etch adhesive after light-curing. Surface hardness of both adhesives was higher on superficial dentin compared to deep dentin. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7036347/ /pubmed/32158783 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.77805.0 Text en Copyright: © 2020: Journal of dentistry (Shiraz) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Firouzmandi, Maryam
Khashaei, Shideh
Knoop Hardness of Self-Etch Adhesives Applied on Superficial and Deep Dentin
title Knoop Hardness of Self-Etch Adhesives Applied on Superficial and Deep Dentin
title_full Knoop Hardness of Self-Etch Adhesives Applied on Superficial and Deep Dentin
title_fullStr Knoop Hardness of Self-Etch Adhesives Applied on Superficial and Deep Dentin
title_full_unstemmed Knoop Hardness of Self-Etch Adhesives Applied on Superficial and Deep Dentin
title_short Knoop Hardness of Self-Etch Adhesives Applied on Superficial and Deep Dentin
title_sort knoop hardness of self-etch adhesives applied on superficial and deep dentin
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7036347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32158783
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.77805.0
work_keys_str_mv AT firouzmandimaryam knoophardnessofselfetchadhesivesappliedonsuperficialanddeepdentin
AT khashaeishideh knoophardnessofselfetchadhesivesappliedonsuperficialanddeepdentin