Cargando…

Root Proteomic Analysis of Two Grapevine Rootstock Genotypes Showing Different Susceptibility to Salt Stress

Salinity represents a very limiting factor that affects the fertility of agricultural soils. Although grapevine is moderately susceptible to salinity, both natural causes and agricultural practices could worsen the impact of this abiotic stress. A promising possibility to reduce this problem in vine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prinsi, Bhakti, Failla, Osvaldo, Scienza, Attilio, Espen, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7037071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32041176
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21031076
_version_ 1783500341625487360
author Prinsi, Bhakti
Failla, Osvaldo
Scienza, Attilio
Espen, Luca
author_facet Prinsi, Bhakti
Failla, Osvaldo
Scienza, Attilio
Espen, Luca
author_sort Prinsi, Bhakti
collection PubMed
description Salinity represents a very limiting factor that affects the fertility of agricultural soils. Although grapevine is moderately susceptible to salinity, both natural causes and agricultural practices could worsen the impact of this abiotic stress. A promising possibility to reduce this problem in vineyards is the use of appropriate graft combinations. The responses of grapevine rootstocks to this abiotic stress at the root level still remain poorly investigated. In order to obtain further information on the multifaceted responses induced by salt stress at the biochemical level, in the present work we analyzed the changes that occurred under control and salt conditions in the root proteomes of two grapevine rootstock genotypes, M4 and 101.14. Moreover, we compared the results considering that M4 and 101.14 were previously described to have lower and higher susceptibility to salt stress, respectively. This study highlighted the greater capability of M4 to maintain and adapt energy metabolism (i.e., synthesis of ATP and NAD(P)H) and to sustain the activation of salt-protective mechanisms (i.e., Na sequestration into the vacuole and synthesis of osmoprotectant compounds). Comparitively, in 101.14 the energy metabolism was deeply affected and there was an evident induction of the enzymatic antioxidant system that occurred, pointing to a metabolic scenario typical of a suffering tissue. Overall, this study describes for the first time in grapevine roots some of the more crucial events that characterize positive (M4) or negative (101.14) responses evoked by salt stress conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7037071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70370712020-03-11 Root Proteomic Analysis of Two Grapevine Rootstock Genotypes Showing Different Susceptibility to Salt Stress Prinsi, Bhakti Failla, Osvaldo Scienza, Attilio Espen, Luca Int J Mol Sci Article Salinity represents a very limiting factor that affects the fertility of agricultural soils. Although grapevine is moderately susceptible to salinity, both natural causes and agricultural practices could worsen the impact of this abiotic stress. A promising possibility to reduce this problem in vineyards is the use of appropriate graft combinations. The responses of grapevine rootstocks to this abiotic stress at the root level still remain poorly investigated. In order to obtain further information on the multifaceted responses induced by salt stress at the biochemical level, in the present work we analyzed the changes that occurred under control and salt conditions in the root proteomes of two grapevine rootstock genotypes, M4 and 101.14. Moreover, we compared the results considering that M4 and 101.14 were previously described to have lower and higher susceptibility to salt stress, respectively. This study highlighted the greater capability of M4 to maintain and adapt energy metabolism (i.e., synthesis of ATP and NAD(P)H) and to sustain the activation of salt-protective mechanisms (i.e., Na sequestration into the vacuole and synthesis of osmoprotectant compounds). Comparitively, in 101.14 the energy metabolism was deeply affected and there was an evident induction of the enzymatic antioxidant system that occurred, pointing to a metabolic scenario typical of a suffering tissue. Overall, this study describes for the first time in grapevine roots some of the more crucial events that characterize positive (M4) or negative (101.14) responses evoked by salt stress conditions. MDPI 2020-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7037071/ /pubmed/32041176 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21031076 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Prinsi, Bhakti
Failla, Osvaldo
Scienza, Attilio
Espen, Luca
Root Proteomic Analysis of Two Grapevine Rootstock Genotypes Showing Different Susceptibility to Salt Stress
title Root Proteomic Analysis of Two Grapevine Rootstock Genotypes Showing Different Susceptibility to Salt Stress
title_full Root Proteomic Analysis of Two Grapevine Rootstock Genotypes Showing Different Susceptibility to Salt Stress
title_fullStr Root Proteomic Analysis of Two Grapevine Rootstock Genotypes Showing Different Susceptibility to Salt Stress
title_full_unstemmed Root Proteomic Analysis of Two Grapevine Rootstock Genotypes Showing Different Susceptibility to Salt Stress
title_short Root Proteomic Analysis of Two Grapevine Rootstock Genotypes Showing Different Susceptibility to Salt Stress
title_sort root proteomic analysis of two grapevine rootstock genotypes showing different susceptibility to salt stress
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7037071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32041176
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21031076
work_keys_str_mv AT prinsibhakti rootproteomicanalysisoftwograpevinerootstockgenotypesshowingdifferentsusceptibilitytosaltstress
AT faillaosvaldo rootproteomicanalysisoftwograpevinerootstockgenotypesshowingdifferentsusceptibilitytosaltstress
AT scienzaattilio rootproteomicanalysisoftwograpevinerootstockgenotypesshowingdifferentsusceptibilitytosaltstress
AT espenluca rootproteomicanalysisoftwograpevinerootstockgenotypesshowingdifferentsusceptibilitytosaltstress