Cargando…

Setting Priorities to Inform Assessment of Care Homes’ Readiness to Participate in Healthcare Innovation: A Systematic Mapping Review and Consensus Process

Organisational context is known to impact on the successful implementation of healthcare initiatives in care homes. We undertook a systematic mapping review to examine whether researchers have considered organisational context when planning, conducting, and reporting the implementation of healthcare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bunn, Frances, Goodman, Claire, Corazzini, Kirsten, Sharpe, Rachel, Handley, Melanie, Lynch, Jennifer, Meyer, Julienne, Dening, Tom, Gordon, Adam L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7037621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32033293
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030987
_version_ 1783500466806587392
author Bunn, Frances
Goodman, Claire
Corazzini, Kirsten
Sharpe, Rachel
Handley, Melanie
Lynch, Jennifer
Meyer, Julienne
Dening, Tom
Gordon, Adam L
author_facet Bunn, Frances
Goodman, Claire
Corazzini, Kirsten
Sharpe, Rachel
Handley, Melanie
Lynch, Jennifer
Meyer, Julienne
Dening, Tom
Gordon, Adam L
author_sort Bunn, Frances
collection PubMed
description Organisational context is known to impact on the successful implementation of healthcare initiatives in care homes. We undertook a systematic mapping review to examine whether researchers have considered organisational context when planning, conducting, and reporting the implementation of healthcare innovations in care homes. Review data were mapped against the Alberta Context Tool, which was designed to assess organizational context in care homes. The review included 56 papers. No studies involved a systematic assessment of organisational context prior to implementation, but many provided post hoc explanations of how organisational context affected the success or otherwise of the innovation. Factors identified to explain a lack of success included poor senior staff engagement, non-alignment with care home culture, limited staff capacity to engage, and low levels of participation from health professionals such as general practitioners (GPs). Thirty-five stakeholders participated in workshops to discuss findings and develop questions for assessing care home readiness to participate in innovations. Ten questions were developed to initiate conversations between innovators and care home staff to support research and implementation. This framework can help researchers initiate discussions about health-related innovation. This will begin to address the gap between implementation theory and practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7037621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70376212020-03-11 Setting Priorities to Inform Assessment of Care Homes’ Readiness to Participate in Healthcare Innovation: A Systematic Mapping Review and Consensus Process Bunn, Frances Goodman, Claire Corazzini, Kirsten Sharpe, Rachel Handley, Melanie Lynch, Jennifer Meyer, Julienne Dening, Tom Gordon, Adam L Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Organisational context is known to impact on the successful implementation of healthcare initiatives in care homes. We undertook a systematic mapping review to examine whether researchers have considered organisational context when planning, conducting, and reporting the implementation of healthcare innovations in care homes. Review data were mapped against the Alberta Context Tool, which was designed to assess organizational context in care homes. The review included 56 papers. No studies involved a systematic assessment of organisational context prior to implementation, but many provided post hoc explanations of how organisational context affected the success or otherwise of the innovation. Factors identified to explain a lack of success included poor senior staff engagement, non-alignment with care home culture, limited staff capacity to engage, and low levels of participation from health professionals such as general practitioners (GPs). Thirty-five stakeholders participated in workshops to discuss findings and develop questions for assessing care home readiness to participate in innovations. Ten questions were developed to initiate conversations between innovators and care home staff to support research and implementation. This framework can help researchers initiate discussions about health-related innovation. This will begin to address the gap between implementation theory and practice. MDPI 2020-02-05 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7037621/ /pubmed/32033293 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030987 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bunn, Frances
Goodman, Claire
Corazzini, Kirsten
Sharpe, Rachel
Handley, Melanie
Lynch, Jennifer
Meyer, Julienne
Dening, Tom
Gordon, Adam L
Setting Priorities to Inform Assessment of Care Homes’ Readiness to Participate in Healthcare Innovation: A Systematic Mapping Review and Consensus Process
title Setting Priorities to Inform Assessment of Care Homes’ Readiness to Participate in Healthcare Innovation: A Systematic Mapping Review and Consensus Process
title_full Setting Priorities to Inform Assessment of Care Homes’ Readiness to Participate in Healthcare Innovation: A Systematic Mapping Review and Consensus Process
title_fullStr Setting Priorities to Inform Assessment of Care Homes’ Readiness to Participate in Healthcare Innovation: A Systematic Mapping Review and Consensus Process
title_full_unstemmed Setting Priorities to Inform Assessment of Care Homes’ Readiness to Participate in Healthcare Innovation: A Systematic Mapping Review and Consensus Process
title_short Setting Priorities to Inform Assessment of Care Homes’ Readiness to Participate in Healthcare Innovation: A Systematic Mapping Review and Consensus Process
title_sort setting priorities to inform assessment of care homes’ readiness to participate in healthcare innovation: a systematic mapping review and consensus process
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7037621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32033293
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030987
work_keys_str_mv AT bunnfrances settingprioritiestoinformassessmentofcarehomesreadinesstoparticipateinhealthcareinnovationasystematicmappingreviewandconsensusprocess
AT goodmanclaire settingprioritiestoinformassessmentofcarehomesreadinesstoparticipateinhealthcareinnovationasystematicmappingreviewandconsensusprocess
AT corazzinikirsten settingprioritiestoinformassessmentofcarehomesreadinesstoparticipateinhealthcareinnovationasystematicmappingreviewandconsensusprocess
AT sharperachel settingprioritiestoinformassessmentofcarehomesreadinesstoparticipateinhealthcareinnovationasystematicmappingreviewandconsensusprocess
AT handleymelanie settingprioritiestoinformassessmentofcarehomesreadinesstoparticipateinhealthcareinnovationasystematicmappingreviewandconsensusprocess
AT lynchjennifer settingprioritiestoinformassessmentofcarehomesreadinesstoparticipateinhealthcareinnovationasystematicmappingreviewandconsensusprocess
AT meyerjulienne settingprioritiestoinformassessmentofcarehomesreadinesstoparticipateinhealthcareinnovationasystematicmappingreviewandconsensusprocess
AT deningtom settingprioritiestoinformassessmentofcarehomesreadinesstoparticipateinhealthcareinnovationasystematicmappingreviewandconsensusprocess
AT gordonadaml settingprioritiestoinformassessmentofcarehomesreadinesstoparticipateinhealthcareinnovationasystematicmappingreviewandconsensusprocess