Cargando…
Approaches to PET Imaging of Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the deadliest type of brain tumor, affecting approximately three in 100,000 adults annually. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging provides an important non-invasive method of measuring biochemically specific targets at GBM lesions. These powerful data can chara...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7037643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32012954 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030568 |
_version_ | 1783500471766351872 |
---|---|
author | Drake, Lindsey R. Hillmer, Ansel T. Cai, Zhengxin |
author_facet | Drake, Lindsey R. Hillmer, Ansel T. Cai, Zhengxin |
author_sort | Drake, Lindsey R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the deadliest type of brain tumor, affecting approximately three in 100,000 adults annually. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging provides an important non-invasive method of measuring biochemically specific targets at GBM lesions. These powerful data can characterize tumors, predict treatment effectiveness, and monitor treatment. This review will discuss the PET imaging agents that have already been evaluated in GBM patients so far, and new imaging targets with promise for future use. Previously used PET imaging agents include the tracers for markers of proliferation ([(11)C]methionine; [(18)F]fluoro-ethyl-L-tyrosine, [(18)F]Fluorodopa, [(18)F]fluoro-thymidine, and [(18)F]clofarabine), hypoxia sensing ([(18)F]FMISO, [(18)F]FET-NIM, [(18)F]EF5, [(18)F]HX4, and [(64)Cu]ATSM), and ligands for inflammation. As cancer therapeutics evolve toward personalized medicine and therapies centered on tumor biomarkers, the development of complimentary selective PET agents can dramatically enhance these efforts. Newer biomarkers for GBM PET imaging are discussed, with some already in use for PET imaging other cancers and neurological disorders. These targets include Sigma 1, Sigma 2, programmed death ligand 1, poly-ADP-ribose polymerase, and isocitrate dehydrogenase. For GBM, these imaging agents come with additional considerations such as blood–brain barrier penetration, quantitative modeling approaches, and nonspecific binding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7037643 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70376432020-03-11 Approaches to PET Imaging of Glioblastoma Drake, Lindsey R. Hillmer, Ansel T. Cai, Zhengxin Molecules Review Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the deadliest type of brain tumor, affecting approximately three in 100,000 adults annually. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging provides an important non-invasive method of measuring biochemically specific targets at GBM lesions. These powerful data can characterize tumors, predict treatment effectiveness, and monitor treatment. This review will discuss the PET imaging agents that have already been evaluated in GBM patients so far, and new imaging targets with promise for future use. Previously used PET imaging agents include the tracers for markers of proliferation ([(11)C]methionine; [(18)F]fluoro-ethyl-L-tyrosine, [(18)F]Fluorodopa, [(18)F]fluoro-thymidine, and [(18)F]clofarabine), hypoxia sensing ([(18)F]FMISO, [(18)F]FET-NIM, [(18)F]EF5, [(18)F]HX4, and [(64)Cu]ATSM), and ligands for inflammation. As cancer therapeutics evolve toward personalized medicine and therapies centered on tumor biomarkers, the development of complimentary selective PET agents can dramatically enhance these efforts. Newer biomarkers for GBM PET imaging are discussed, with some already in use for PET imaging other cancers and neurological disorders. These targets include Sigma 1, Sigma 2, programmed death ligand 1, poly-ADP-ribose polymerase, and isocitrate dehydrogenase. For GBM, these imaging agents come with additional considerations such as blood–brain barrier penetration, quantitative modeling approaches, and nonspecific binding. MDPI 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7037643/ /pubmed/32012954 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030568 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Drake, Lindsey R. Hillmer, Ansel T. Cai, Zhengxin Approaches to PET Imaging of Glioblastoma |
title | Approaches to PET Imaging of Glioblastoma |
title_full | Approaches to PET Imaging of Glioblastoma |
title_fullStr | Approaches to PET Imaging of Glioblastoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Approaches to PET Imaging of Glioblastoma |
title_short | Approaches to PET Imaging of Glioblastoma |
title_sort | approaches to pet imaging of glioblastoma |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7037643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32012954 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030568 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT drakelindseyr approachestopetimagingofglioblastoma AT hillmeranselt approachestopetimagingofglioblastoma AT caizhengxin approachestopetimagingofglioblastoma |