Cargando…

Approaches to PET Imaging of Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the deadliest type of brain tumor, affecting approximately three in 100,000 adults annually. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging provides an important non-invasive method of measuring biochemically specific targets at GBM lesions. These powerful data can chara...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drake, Lindsey R., Hillmer, Ansel T., Cai, Zhengxin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7037643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32012954
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030568
_version_ 1783500471766351872
author Drake, Lindsey R.
Hillmer, Ansel T.
Cai, Zhengxin
author_facet Drake, Lindsey R.
Hillmer, Ansel T.
Cai, Zhengxin
author_sort Drake, Lindsey R.
collection PubMed
description Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the deadliest type of brain tumor, affecting approximately three in 100,000 adults annually. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging provides an important non-invasive method of measuring biochemically specific targets at GBM lesions. These powerful data can characterize tumors, predict treatment effectiveness, and monitor treatment. This review will discuss the PET imaging agents that have already been evaluated in GBM patients so far, and new imaging targets with promise for future use. Previously used PET imaging agents include the tracers for markers of proliferation ([(11)C]methionine; [(18)F]fluoro-ethyl-L-tyrosine, [(18)F]Fluorodopa, [(18)F]fluoro-thymidine, and [(18)F]clofarabine), hypoxia sensing ([(18)F]FMISO, [(18)F]FET-NIM, [(18)F]EF5, [(18)F]HX4, and [(64)Cu]ATSM), and ligands for inflammation. As cancer therapeutics evolve toward personalized medicine and therapies centered on tumor biomarkers, the development of complimentary selective PET agents can dramatically enhance these efforts. Newer biomarkers for GBM PET imaging are discussed, with some already in use for PET imaging other cancers and neurological disorders. These targets include Sigma 1, Sigma 2, programmed death ligand 1, poly-ADP-ribose polymerase, and isocitrate dehydrogenase. For GBM, these imaging agents come with additional considerations such as blood–brain barrier penetration, quantitative modeling approaches, and nonspecific binding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7037643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70376432020-03-11 Approaches to PET Imaging of Glioblastoma Drake, Lindsey R. Hillmer, Ansel T. Cai, Zhengxin Molecules Review Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the deadliest type of brain tumor, affecting approximately three in 100,000 adults annually. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging provides an important non-invasive method of measuring biochemically specific targets at GBM lesions. These powerful data can characterize tumors, predict treatment effectiveness, and monitor treatment. This review will discuss the PET imaging agents that have already been evaluated in GBM patients so far, and new imaging targets with promise for future use. Previously used PET imaging agents include the tracers for markers of proliferation ([(11)C]methionine; [(18)F]fluoro-ethyl-L-tyrosine, [(18)F]Fluorodopa, [(18)F]fluoro-thymidine, and [(18)F]clofarabine), hypoxia sensing ([(18)F]FMISO, [(18)F]FET-NIM, [(18)F]EF5, [(18)F]HX4, and [(64)Cu]ATSM), and ligands for inflammation. As cancer therapeutics evolve toward personalized medicine and therapies centered on tumor biomarkers, the development of complimentary selective PET agents can dramatically enhance these efforts. Newer biomarkers for GBM PET imaging are discussed, with some already in use for PET imaging other cancers and neurological disorders. These targets include Sigma 1, Sigma 2, programmed death ligand 1, poly-ADP-ribose polymerase, and isocitrate dehydrogenase. For GBM, these imaging agents come with additional considerations such as blood–brain barrier penetration, quantitative modeling approaches, and nonspecific binding. MDPI 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7037643/ /pubmed/32012954 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030568 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Drake, Lindsey R.
Hillmer, Ansel T.
Cai, Zhengxin
Approaches to PET Imaging of Glioblastoma
title Approaches to PET Imaging of Glioblastoma
title_full Approaches to PET Imaging of Glioblastoma
title_fullStr Approaches to PET Imaging of Glioblastoma
title_full_unstemmed Approaches to PET Imaging of Glioblastoma
title_short Approaches to PET Imaging of Glioblastoma
title_sort approaches to pet imaging of glioblastoma
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7037643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32012954
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030568
work_keys_str_mv AT drakelindseyr approachestopetimagingofglioblastoma
AT hillmeranselt approachestopetimagingofglioblastoma
AT caizhengxin approachestopetimagingofglioblastoma