Cargando…

Bald and Bad?: Experimental Evidence for a Dual-Process Account of Baldness Stereotyping

Abstract. According to (a) the beauty ideal of a full head of hair and (b) the physical attractiveness stereotype (PAS; “what is beautiful is good”), bald men should appear less attractive than nonbald men, not only physically but also socially. To explain inconsistent results on this prediction in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kranz, Dirk, Nadarevic, Lena, Erdfelder, Edgar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hogrefe Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7037739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31603047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000457
_version_ 1783500493472923648
author Kranz, Dirk
Nadarevic, Lena
Erdfelder, Edgar
author_facet Kranz, Dirk
Nadarevic, Lena
Erdfelder, Edgar
author_sort Kranz, Dirk
collection PubMed
description Abstract. According to (a) the beauty ideal of a full head of hair and (b) the physical attractiveness stereotype (PAS; “what is beautiful is good”), bald men should appear less attractive than nonbald men, not only physically but also socially. To explain inconsistent results on this prediction in previous research, we suggest two antagonistic processes: the automatic activation of the PAS at the implicit level and its suppression at the explicit level, the latter process selectively triggered by individuating information about the target person. In line with this account, we only found negative social attractiveness ratings for bald men by same-aged women when individuating target information was lacking (Experiment 1). In contrast, irrespective of whether individuating information was available or not, we reliably found evidence for the PAS in different implicit paradigms (the implicit association test in Experiment 2 and a source monitoring task in Experiment 3). We conclude that individuating information about bald men suppresses PAS application, but not PAS activation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7037739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hogrefe Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70377392020-02-24 Bald and Bad?: Experimental Evidence for a Dual-Process Account of Baldness Stereotyping Kranz, Dirk Nadarevic, Lena Erdfelder, Edgar Exp Psychol Research Article Abstract. According to (a) the beauty ideal of a full head of hair and (b) the physical attractiveness stereotype (PAS; “what is beautiful is good”), bald men should appear less attractive than nonbald men, not only physically but also socially. To explain inconsistent results on this prediction in previous research, we suggest two antagonistic processes: the automatic activation of the PAS at the implicit level and its suppression at the explicit level, the latter process selectively triggered by individuating information about the target person. In line with this account, we only found negative social attractiveness ratings for bald men by same-aged women when individuating target information was lacking (Experiment 1). In contrast, irrespective of whether individuating information was available or not, we reliably found evidence for the PAS in different implicit paradigms (the implicit association test in Experiment 2 and a source monitoring task in Experiment 3). We conclude that individuating information about bald men suppresses PAS application, but not PAS activation. Hogrefe Publishing 2019-10-11 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC7037739/ /pubmed/31603047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000457 Text en 򠀉 2019 Distributed under the Hogrefe OpenMind License (https://doi.org/10.1027/a000001)
spellingShingle Research Article
Kranz, Dirk
Nadarevic, Lena
Erdfelder, Edgar
Bald and Bad?: Experimental Evidence for a Dual-Process Account of Baldness Stereotyping
title Bald and Bad?: Experimental Evidence for a Dual-Process Account of Baldness Stereotyping
title_full Bald and Bad?: Experimental Evidence for a Dual-Process Account of Baldness Stereotyping
title_fullStr Bald and Bad?: Experimental Evidence for a Dual-Process Account of Baldness Stereotyping
title_full_unstemmed Bald and Bad?: Experimental Evidence for a Dual-Process Account of Baldness Stereotyping
title_short Bald and Bad?: Experimental Evidence for a Dual-Process Account of Baldness Stereotyping
title_sort bald and bad?: experimental evidence for a dual-process account of baldness stereotyping
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7037739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31603047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000457
work_keys_str_mv AT kranzdirk baldandbadexperimentalevidenceforadualprocessaccountofbaldnessstereotyping
AT nadareviclena baldandbadexperimentalevidenceforadualprocessaccountofbaldnessstereotyping
AT erdfelderedgar baldandbadexperimentalevidenceforadualprocessaccountofbaldnessstereotyping