Cargando…
Quantifying the Health Burden Misclassification from the Use of Different PM(2.5) Exposure Tier Models: A Case Study of London
Exposure to PM(2.5) has been associated with increased mortality in urban areas. Hence, reducing the uncertainty in human exposure assessments is essential for more accurate health burden estimates. Here, we quantified the misclassification that occurred when using different exposure approaches to p...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7037921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050474 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17031099 |
_version_ | 1783500534829809664 |
---|---|
author | Kazakos, Vasilis Luo, Zhiwen Ewart, Ian |
author_facet | Kazakos, Vasilis Luo, Zhiwen Ewart, Ian |
author_sort | Kazakos, Vasilis |
collection | PubMed |
description | Exposure to PM(2.5) has been associated with increased mortality in urban areas. Hence, reducing the uncertainty in human exposure assessments is essential for more accurate health burden estimates. Here, we quantified the misclassification that occurred when using different exposure approaches to predict the mortality burden of a population using London as a case study. We developed a framework for quantifying the misclassification of the total mortality burden attributable to exposure to fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) in four major microenvironments (MEs) (dwellings, aboveground transportation, London Underground (LU) and outdoors) in the Greater London Area (GLA), in 2017. We demonstrated that differences exist between five different exposure Tier-models with incrementally increasing complexity, moving from static to more dynamic approaches. BenMap-CE, the open source software developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, was used as a tool to achieve spatial distribution of the ambient concentration by interpolating the monitoring data to the unmonitored areas and ultimately estimating the change in mortality on a fine resolution. Indoor exposure to PM(2.5) is the largest contributor to total population exposure concentration, accounting for 83% of total predicted population exposure, followed by the London Underground, which contributes approximately 15%, despite the average time spent there by Londoners being only 0.4%. After incorporating housing stock and time-activity data, moving from static to most dynamic metric, Inner London showed the highest reduction in exposure concentration (i.e., approximately 37%) and as a result the largest change in mortality (i.e., health burden/mortality misclassification) was observed in central GLA. Overall, our findings showed that using outdoor concentration as a surrogate for total population exposure but ignoring different exposure concentration that occur indoors and time spent in transit, led to a misclassification of 1174–1541 mean predicted mortalities in GLA. We generally confirm that increasing the complexity and incorporating important microenvironments, such as the highly polluted LU, could significantly reduce the misclassification of health burden assessments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7037921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70379212020-03-10 Quantifying the Health Burden Misclassification from the Use of Different PM(2.5) Exposure Tier Models: A Case Study of London Kazakos, Vasilis Luo, Zhiwen Ewart, Ian Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Exposure to PM(2.5) has been associated with increased mortality in urban areas. Hence, reducing the uncertainty in human exposure assessments is essential for more accurate health burden estimates. Here, we quantified the misclassification that occurred when using different exposure approaches to predict the mortality burden of a population using London as a case study. We developed a framework for quantifying the misclassification of the total mortality burden attributable to exposure to fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) in four major microenvironments (MEs) (dwellings, aboveground transportation, London Underground (LU) and outdoors) in the Greater London Area (GLA), in 2017. We demonstrated that differences exist between five different exposure Tier-models with incrementally increasing complexity, moving from static to more dynamic approaches. BenMap-CE, the open source software developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, was used as a tool to achieve spatial distribution of the ambient concentration by interpolating the monitoring data to the unmonitored areas and ultimately estimating the change in mortality on a fine resolution. Indoor exposure to PM(2.5) is the largest contributor to total population exposure concentration, accounting for 83% of total predicted population exposure, followed by the London Underground, which contributes approximately 15%, despite the average time spent there by Londoners being only 0.4%. After incorporating housing stock and time-activity data, moving from static to most dynamic metric, Inner London showed the highest reduction in exposure concentration (i.e., approximately 37%) and as a result the largest change in mortality (i.e., health burden/mortality misclassification) was observed in central GLA. Overall, our findings showed that using outdoor concentration as a surrogate for total population exposure but ignoring different exposure concentration that occur indoors and time spent in transit, led to a misclassification of 1174–1541 mean predicted mortalities in GLA. We generally confirm that increasing the complexity and incorporating important microenvironments, such as the highly polluted LU, could significantly reduce the misclassification of health burden assessments. MDPI 2020-02-09 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7037921/ /pubmed/32050474 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17031099 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kazakos, Vasilis Luo, Zhiwen Ewart, Ian Quantifying the Health Burden Misclassification from the Use of Different PM(2.5) Exposure Tier Models: A Case Study of London |
title | Quantifying the Health Burden Misclassification from the Use of Different PM(2.5) Exposure Tier Models: A Case Study of London |
title_full | Quantifying the Health Burden Misclassification from the Use of Different PM(2.5) Exposure Tier Models: A Case Study of London |
title_fullStr | Quantifying the Health Burden Misclassification from the Use of Different PM(2.5) Exposure Tier Models: A Case Study of London |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying the Health Burden Misclassification from the Use of Different PM(2.5) Exposure Tier Models: A Case Study of London |
title_short | Quantifying the Health Burden Misclassification from the Use of Different PM(2.5) Exposure Tier Models: A Case Study of London |
title_sort | quantifying the health burden misclassification from the use of different pm(2.5) exposure tier models: a case study of london |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7037921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050474 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17031099 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kazakosvasilis quantifyingthehealthburdenmisclassificationfromtheuseofdifferentpm25exposuretiermodelsacasestudyoflondon AT luozhiwen quantifyingthehealthburdenmisclassificationfromtheuseofdifferentpm25exposuretiermodelsacasestudyoflondon AT ewartian quantifyingthehealthburdenmisclassificationfromtheuseofdifferentpm25exposuretiermodelsacasestudyoflondon |