Cargando…

Compliance to spectacle use in children with refractive errors- a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Primary objective of this review was to measure compliance with spectacle use in children with refractive errors. Secondary objective was to understand the reasons for non-compliance. METHODS: The databases searched were Ovid, EMBASE, CINAHL and Pubmed. All studies up to March, 2018 were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhirar, Nonita, Dudeja, Sankalp, Duggal, Mona, Gupta, Parul Chawla, Jaiswal, Nishant, Singh, Meenu, Ram, Jagat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7038539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01345-9
_version_ 1783500663555096576
author Dhirar, Nonita
Dudeja, Sankalp
Duggal, Mona
Gupta, Parul Chawla
Jaiswal, Nishant
Singh, Meenu
Ram, Jagat
author_facet Dhirar, Nonita
Dudeja, Sankalp
Duggal, Mona
Gupta, Parul Chawla
Jaiswal, Nishant
Singh, Meenu
Ram, Jagat
author_sort Dhirar, Nonita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary objective of this review was to measure compliance with spectacle use in children with refractive errors. Secondary objective was to understand the reasons for non-compliance. METHODS: The databases searched were Ovid, EMBASE, CINAHL and Pubmed. All studies up to March, 2018 were included. The search terms were- ((((((Compliance [Title/Abstract]) OR Adherence [Title/Abstract]) OR Compliant [Title/Abstract]) OR Adherent [Title/Abstract])) AND (((Spectacle [Title/Abstract]) OR Spectacles [Title/Abstract]) OR Eye Glasses [Title/Abstract])) AND ((((Child [Title/Abstract]) OR Children [Title/Abstract]) OR Adolescent [Title/Abstract]) OR Adolescents [Title/Abstract]). Two researchers independently searched the databases and initial screening obtained 33 articles. The PRISMA guidelines were followed for conducting and writing the systematic review. Two reviewers assessed data quality independently using the Quality Assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO). Poor quality studies were those, which had a score of less than 33% on the QATSO tool. Sensitivity analysis was done to determine if poor quality studies effected compliance. Galbraith plot was used to investigate statistical heterogeneity amongst studies. A random effects model was used to pool compliance. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included in the review, of which 20 were included in the quantitative analysis. All the studies were cross sectional. The overall compliance with spectacle use was 40.14% (95% CI- 32.78-47.50). The compliance varied from 9.84% (95% CI = 2.36–17.31) to 78.57% (95% CI = 68.96–88.18). The compliance derived in sensitivity analysis was 40.09%. Reasons for non-compliance were broken/lost spectacles, forgetfulness, and parental disapproval. CONCLUSION: Appropriate remedial measures such as health education and strengthening vision care services will be required to address poor compliance with spectacle use among children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7038539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70385392020-03-02 Compliance to spectacle use in children with refractive errors- a systematic review and meta-analysis Dhirar, Nonita Dudeja, Sankalp Duggal, Mona Gupta, Parul Chawla Jaiswal, Nishant Singh, Meenu Ram, Jagat BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Primary objective of this review was to measure compliance with spectacle use in children with refractive errors. Secondary objective was to understand the reasons for non-compliance. METHODS: The databases searched were Ovid, EMBASE, CINAHL and Pubmed. All studies up to March, 2018 were included. The search terms were- ((((((Compliance [Title/Abstract]) OR Adherence [Title/Abstract]) OR Compliant [Title/Abstract]) OR Adherent [Title/Abstract])) AND (((Spectacle [Title/Abstract]) OR Spectacles [Title/Abstract]) OR Eye Glasses [Title/Abstract])) AND ((((Child [Title/Abstract]) OR Children [Title/Abstract]) OR Adolescent [Title/Abstract]) OR Adolescents [Title/Abstract]). Two researchers independently searched the databases and initial screening obtained 33 articles. The PRISMA guidelines were followed for conducting and writing the systematic review. Two reviewers assessed data quality independently using the Quality Assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO). Poor quality studies were those, which had a score of less than 33% on the QATSO tool. Sensitivity analysis was done to determine if poor quality studies effected compliance. Galbraith plot was used to investigate statistical heterogeneity amongst studies. A random effects model was used to pool compliance. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included in the review, of which 20 were included in the quantitative analysis. All the studies were cross sectional. The overall compliance with spectacle use was 40.14% (95% CI- 32.78-47.50). The compliance varied from 9.84% (95% CI = 2.36–17.31) to 78.57% (95% CI = 68.96–88.18). The compliance derived in sensitivity analysis was 40.09%. Reasons for non-compliance were broken/lost spectacles, forgetfulness, and parental disapproval. CONCLUSION: Appropriate remedial measures such as health education and strengthening vision care services will be required to address poor compliance with spectacle use among children. BioMed Central 2020-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7038539/ /pubmed/32093669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01345-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dhirar, Nonita
Dudeja, Sankalp
Duggal, Mona
Gupta, Parul Chawla
Jaiswal, Nishant
Singh, Meenu
Ram, Jagat
Compliance to spectacle use in children with refractive errors- a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Compliance to spectacle use in children with refractive errors- a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Compliance to spectacle use in children with refractive errors- a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Compliance to spectacle use in children with refractive errors- a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Compliance to spectacle use in children with refractive errors- a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Compliance to spectacle use in children with refractive errors- a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort compliance to spectacle use in children with refractive errors- a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7038539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01345-9
work_keys_str_mv AT dhirarnonita compliancetospectacleuseinchildrenwithrefractiveerrorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dudejasankalp compliancetospectacleuseinchildrenwithrefractiveerrorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT duggalmona compliancetospectacleuseinchildrenwithrefractiveerrorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guptaparulchawla compliancetospectacleuseinchildrenwithrefractiveerrorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jaiswalnishant compliancetospectacleuseinchildrenwithrefractiveerrorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT singhmeenu compliancetospectacleuseinchildrenwithrefractiveerrorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ramjagat compliancetospectacleuseinchildrenwithrefractiveerrorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis