Cargando…
Compliance to spectacle use in children with refractive errors- a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Primary objective of this review was to measure compliance with spectacle use in children with refractive errors. Secondary objective was to understand the reasons for non-compliance. METHODS: The databases searched were Ovid, EMBASE, CINAHL and Pubmed. All studies up to March, 2018 were...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7038539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01345-9 |
_version_ | 1783500663555096576 |
---|---|
author | Dhirar, Nonita Dudeja, Sankalp Duggal, Mona Gupta, Parul Chawla Jaiswal, Nishant Singh, Meenu Ram, Jagat |
author_facet | Dhirar, Nonita Dudeja, Sankalp Duggal, Mona Gupta, Parul Chawla Jaiswal, Nishant Singh, Meenu Ram, Jagat |
author_sort | Dhirar, Nonita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Primary objective of this review was to measure compliance with spectacle use in children with refractive errors. Secondary objective was to understand the reasons for non-compliance. METHODS: The databases searched were Ovid, EMBASE, CINAHL and Pubmed. All studies up to March, 2018 were included. The search terms were- ((((((Compliance [Title/Abstract]) OR Adherence [Title/Abstract]) OR Compliant [Title/Abstract]) OR Adherent [Title/Abstract])) AND (((Spectacle [Title/Abstract]) OR Spectacles [Title/Abstract]) OR Eye Glasses [Title/Abstract])) AND ((((Child [Title/Abstract]) OR Children [Title/Abstract]) OR Adolescent [Title/Abstract]) OR Adolescents [Title/Abstract]). Two researchers independently searched the databases and initial screening obtained 33 articles. The PRISMA guidelines were followed for conducting and writing the systematic review. Two reviewers assessed data quality independently using the Quality Assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO). Poor quality studies were those, which had a score of less than 33% on the QATSO tool. Sensitivity analysis was done to determine if poor quality studies effected compliance. Galbraith plot was used to investigate statistical heterogeneity amongst studies. A random effects model was used to pool compliance. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included in the review, of which 20 were included in the quantitative analysis. All the studies were cross sectional. The overall compliance with spectacle use was 40.14% (95% CI- 32.78-47.50). The compliance varied from 9.84% (95% CI = 2.36–17.31) to 78.57% (95% CI = 68.96–88.18). The compliance derived in sensitivity analysis was 40.09%. Reasons for non-compliance were broken/lost spectacles, forgetfulness, and parental disapproval. CONCLUSION: Appropriate remedial measures such as health education and strengthening vision care services will be required to address poor compliance with spectacle use among children. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7038539 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70385392020-03-02 Compliance to spectacle use in children with refractive errors- a systematic review and meta-analysis Dhirar, Nonita Dudeja, Sankalp Duggal, Mona Gupta, Parul Chawla Jaiswal, Nishant Singh, Meenu Ram, Jagat BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Primary objective of this review was to measure compliance with spectacle use in children with refractive errors. Secondary objective was to understand the reasons for non-compliance. METHODS: The databases searched were Ovid, EMBASE, CINAHL and Pubmed. All studies up to March, 2018 were included. The search terms were- ((((((Compliance [Title/Abstract]) OR Adherence [Title/Abstract]) OR Compliant [Title/Abstract]) OR Adherent [Title/Abstract])) AND (((Spectacle [Title/Abstract]) OR Spectacles [Title/Abstract]) OR Eye Glasses [Title/Abstract])) AND ((((Child [Title/Abstract]) OR Children [Title/Abstract]) OR Adolescent [Title/Abstract]) OR Adolescents [Title/Abstract]). Two researchers independently searched the databases and initial screening obtained 33 articles. The PRISMA guidelines were followed for conducting and writing the systematic review. Two reviewers assessed data quality independently using the Quality Assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO). Poor quality studies were those, which had a score of less than 33% on the QATSO tool. Sensitivity analysis was done to determine if poor quality studies effected compliance. Galbraith plot was used to investigate statistical heterogeneity amongst studies. A random effects model was used to pool compliance. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included in the review, of which 20 were included in the quantitative analysis. All the studies were cross sectional. The overall compliance with spectacle use was 40.14% (95% CI- 32.78-47.50). The compliance varied from 9.84% (95% CI = 2.36–17.31) to 78.57% (95% CI = 68.96–88.18). The compliance derived in sensitivity analysis was 40.09%. Reasons for non-compliance were broken/lost spectacles, forgetfulness, and parental disapproval. CONCLUSION: Appropriate remedial measures such as health education and strengthening vision care services will be required to address poor compliance with spectacle use among children. BioMed Central 2020-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7038539/ /pubmed/32093669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01345-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dhirar, Nonita Dudeja, Sankalp Duggal, Mona Gupta, Parul Chawla Jaiswal, Nishant Singh, Meenu Ram, Jagat Compliance to spectacle use in children with refractive errors- a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Compliance to spectacle use in children with refractive errors- a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Compliance to spectacle use in children with refractive errors- a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Compliance to spectacle use in children with refractive errors- a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Compliance to spectacle use in children with refractive errors- a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Compliance to spectacle use in children with refractive errors- a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | compliance to spectacle use in children with refractive errors- a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7038539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01345-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dhirarnonita compliancetospectacleuseinchildrenwithrefractiveerrorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dudejasankalp compliancetospectacleuseinchildrenwithrefractiveerrorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT duggalmona compliancetospectacleuseinchildrenwithrefractiveerrorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT guptaparulchawla compliancetospectacleuseinchildrenwithrefractiveerrorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jaiswalnishant compliancetospectacleuseinchildrenwithrefractiveerrorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT singhmeenu compliancetospectacleuseinchildrenwithrefractiveerrorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ramjagat compliancetospectacleuseinchildrenwithrefractiveerrorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |