Cargando…
Evaluating the Vulnerability of Several Geodetic GNSS Receivers under Chirp Signal L1/E1 Jamming
Understanding the factors that might intentionally influence the reception of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) signals can be a challenging topic today. The focus of this research is to evaluate the vulnerability of geodetic GNSS receivers under the use of a low-cost L1 GPS band and E1 Gali...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7038714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32028693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20030814 |
_version_ | 1783500698374111232 |
---|---|
author | Bažec, Matej Dimc, Franc Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona |
author_facet | Bažec, Matej Dimc, Franc Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona |
author_sort | Bažec, Matej |
collection | PubMed |
description | Understanding the factors that might intentionally influence the reception of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) signals can be a challenging topic today. The focus of this research is to evaluate the vulnerability of geodetic GNSS receivers under the use of a low-cost L1 GPS band and E1 Galileo frequency band (L1/E1) frequency jammer. A suitable area for testing was established in Slovenia. Nine receivers from different manufacturers were under consideration in this study. While positioning, intentional 3-minute jammings were performed by a jammer that was located statically at different distances from receivers. Furthermore, kinematic disturbances were performed using a jammer placed in a vehicle that passed the testing area at various speeds. An analysis of different scenarios indicated that despite the use of an L1/E1 jammer, the GLONASS (Russian: Globalnaya Navigatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema) and Galileo signals were also affected, either due to the increased carrier-to-noise-ratio (C/N(0)) or, in the worst cases, by a loss-of-signal. A jammer could substantially affect the position, either with a lack of any practical solution or even with a wrong position. Maximal errors in the carrier-phase positions, which should be considered a concern for geodesy, differed by a few metres from the exact solution. The factor that completely disabled the signal reception was the proximity of a jammer, regardless of its static or kinematic mode. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7038714 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70387142020-03-09 Evaluating the Vulnerability of Several Geodetic GNSS Receivers under Chirp Signal L1/E1 Jamming Bažec, Matej Dimc, Franc Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona Sensors (Basel) Article Understanding the factors that might intentionally influence the reception of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) signals can be a challenging topic today. The focus of this research is to evaluate the vulnerability of geodetic GNSS receivers under the use of a low-cost L1 GPS band and E1 Galileo frequency band (L1/E1) frequency jammer. A suitable area for testing was established in Slovenia. Nine receivers from different manufacturers were under consideration in this study. While positioning, intentional 3-minute jammings were performed by a jammer that was located statically at different distances from receivers. Furthermore, kinematic disturbances were performed using a jammer placed in a vehicle that passed the testing area at various speeds. An analysis of different scenarios indicated that despite the use of an L1/E1 jammer, the GLONASS (Russian: Globalnaya Navigatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema) and Galileo signals were also affected, either due to the increased carrier-to-noise-ratio (C/N(0)) or, in the worst cases, by a loss-of-signal. A jammer could substantially affect the position, either with a lack of any practical solution or even with a wrong position. Maximal errors in the carrier-phase positions, which should be considered a concern for geodesy, differed by a few metres from the exact solution. The factor that completely disabled the signal reception was the proximity of a jammer, regardless of its static or kinematic mode. MDPI 2020-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7038714/ /pubmed/32028693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20030814 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bažec, Matej Dimc, Franc Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona Evaluating the Vulnerability of Several Geodetic GNSS Receivers under Chirp Signal L1/E1 Jamming |
title | Evaluating the Vulnerability of Several Geodetic GNSS Receivers under Chirp Signal L1/E1 Jamming |
title_full | Evaluating the Vulnerability of Several Geodetic GNSS Receivers under Chirp Signal L1/E1 Jamming |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the Vulnerability of Several Geodetic GNSS Receivers under Chirp Signal L1/E1 Jamming |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the Vulnerability of Several Geodetic GNSS Receivers under Chirp Signal L1/E1 Jamming |
title_short | Evaluating the Vulnerability of Several Geodetic GNSS Receivers under Chirp Signal L1/E1 Jamming |
title_sort | evaluating the vulnerability of several geodetic gnss receivers under chirp signal l1/e1 jamming |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7038714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32028693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20030814 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bazecmatej evaluatingthevulnerabilityofseveralgeodeticgnssreceiversunderchirpsignall1e1jamming AT dimcfranc evaluatingthevulnerabilityofseveralgeodeticgnssreceiversunderchirpsignall1e1jamming AT pavlovcicpreserenpolona evaluatingthevulnerabilityofseveralgeodeticgnssreceiversunderchirpsignall1e1jamming |