Cargando…

Evaluating the Vulnerability of Several Geodetic GNSS Receivers under Chirp Signal L1/E1 Jamming

Understanding the factors that might intentionally influence the reception of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) signals can be a challenging topic today. The focus of this research is to evaluate the vulnerability of geodetic GNSS receivers under the use of a low-cost L1 GPS band and E1 Gali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bažec, Matej, Dimc, Franc, Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7038714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32028693
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20030814
_version_ 1783500698374111232
author Bažec, Matej
Dimc, Franc
Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona
author_facet Bažec, Matej
Dimc, Franc
Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona
author_sort Bažec, Matej
collection PubMed
description Understanding the factors that might intentionally influence the reception of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) signals can be a challenging topic today. The focus of this research is to evaluate the vulnerability of geodetic GNSS receivers under the use of a low-cost L1 GPS band and E1 Galileo frequency band (L1/E1) frequency jammer. A suitable area for testing was established in Slovenia. Nine receivers from different manufacturers were under consideration in this study. While positioning, intentional 3-minute jammings were performed by a jammer that was located statically at different distances from receivers. Furthermore, kinematic disturbances were performed using a jammer placed in a vehicle that passed the testing area at various speeds. An analysis of different scenarios indicated that despite the use of an L1/E1 jammer, the GLONASS (Russian: Globalnaya Navigatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema) and Galileo signals were also affected, either due to the increased carrier-to-noise-ratio (C/N(0)) or, in the worst cases, by a loss-of-signal. A jammer could substantially affect the position, either with a lack of any practical solution or even with a wrong position. Maximal errors in the carrier-phase positions, which should be considered a concern for geodesy, differed by a few metres from the exact solution. The factor that completely disabled the signal reception was the proximity of a jammer, regardless of its static or kinematic mode.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7038714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70387142020-03-09 Evaluating the Vulnerability of Several Geodetic GNSS Receivers under Chirp Signal L1/E1 Jamming Bažec, Matej Dimc, Franc Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona Sensors (Basel) Article Understanding the factors that might intentionally influence the reception of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) signals can be a challenging topic today. The focus of this research is to evaluate the vulnerability of geodetic GNSS receivers under the use of a low-cost L1 GPS band and E1 Galileo frequency band (L1/E1) frequency jammer. A suitable area for testing was established in Slovenia. Nine receivers from different manufacturers were under consideration in this study. While positioning, intentional 3-minute jammings were performed by a jammer that was located statically at different distances from receivers. Furthermore, kinematic disturbances were performed using a jammer placed in a vehicle that passed the testing area at various speeds. An analysis of different scenarios indicated that despite the use of an L1/E1 jammer, the GLONASS (Russian: Globalnaya Navigatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema) and Galileo signals were also affected, either due to the increased carrier-to-noise-ratio (C/N(0)) or, in the worst cases, by a loss-of-signal. A jammer could substantially affect the position, either with a lack of any practical solution or even with a wrong position. Maximal errors in the carrier-phase positions, which should be considered a concern for geodesy, differed by a few metres from the exact solution. The factor that completely disabled the signal reception was the proximity of a jammer, regardless of its static or kinematic mode. MDPI 2020-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7038714/ /pubmed/32028693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20030814 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bažec, Matej
Dimc, Franc
Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona
Evaluating the Vulnerability of Several Geodetic GNSS Receivers under Chirp Signal L1/E1 Jamming
title Evaluating the Vulnerability of Several Geodetic GNSS Receivers under Chirp Signal L1/E1 Jamming
title_full Evaluating the Vulnerability of Several Geodetic GNSS Receivers under Chirp Signal L1/E1 Jamming
title_fullStr Evaluating the Vulnerability of Several Geodetic GNSS Receivers under Chirp Signal L1/E1 Jamming
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Vulnerability of Several Geodetic GNSS Receivers under Chirp Signal L1/E1 Jamming
title_short Evaluating the Vulnerability of Several Geodetic GNSS Receivers under Chirp Signal L1/E1 Jamming
title_sort evaluating the vulnerability of several geodetic gnss receivers under chirp signal l1/e1 jamming
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7038714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32028693
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20030814
work_keys_str_mv AT bazecmatej evaluatingthevulnerabilityofseveralgeodeticgnssreceiversunderchirpsignall1e1jamming
AT dimcfranc evaluatingthevulnerabilityofseveralgeodeticgnssreceiversunderchirpsignall1e1jamming
AT pavlovcicpreserenpolona evaluatingthevulnerabilityofseveralgeodeticgnssreceiversunderchirpsignall1e1jamming