Cargando…

The ABA intervention for improving breastfeeding initiation and continuation: Feasibility study results

The UK has low breastfeeding rates, with socioeconomic disparities. The Assets‐based feeding help Before and After birth (ABA) intervention was designed to be inclusive and improve infant feeding behaviours. ABA is underpinned by the behaviour change wheel and offers an assets‐based approach focusin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clarke, Joanne L., Ingram, Jenny, Johnson, Debbie, Thomson, Gill, Trickey, Heather, Dombrowski, Stephan U., Sitch, Alice, Dykes, Fiona, Feltham, Max, MacArthur, Christine, Roberts, Tracy, Hoddinott, Pat, Jolly, Kate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7038877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31793233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12907
_version_ 1783500722233409536
author Clarke, Joanne L.
Ingram, Jenny
Johnson, Debbie
Thomson, Gill
Trickey, Heather
Dombrowski, Stephan U.
Sitch, Alice
Dykes, Fiona
Feltham, Max
MacArthur, Christine
Roberts, Tracy
Hoddinott, Pat
Jolly, Kate
author_facet Clarke, Joanne L.
Ingram, Jenny
Johnson, Debbie
Thomson, Gill
Trickey, Heather
Dombrowski, Stephan U.
Sitch, Alice
Dykes, Fiona
Feltham, Max
MacArthur, Christine
Roberts, Tracy
Hoddinott, Pat
Jolly, Kate
author_sort Clarke, Joanne L.
collection PubMed
description The UK has low breastfeeding rates, with socioeconomic disparities. The Assets‐based feeding help Before and After birth (ABA) intervention was designed to be inclusive and improve infant feeding behaviours. ABA is underpinned by the behaviour change wheel and offers an assets‐based approach focusing on positive capabilities of individuals and communities, including use of a Genogram. This study aimed to investigate feasibility of intervention delivery within a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Nulliparous women ≥16 years, (n = 103) from two English sites were recruited and randomised to either intervention or usual care. The intervention – delivered through face‐to‐face, telephone and text message by trained Infant Feeding Helpers (IFHs) – ran from 30‐weeks' gestation until 5‐months postnatal. Outcomes included recruitment rates and follow‐up at 3‐days, 8‐weeks and 6‐months postnatal, with collection of future full trial outcomes via questionnaires. A mixed‐methods process evaluation included qualitative interviews with 30 women, 13 IFHs and 17 maternity providers; IFH contact logs; and fidelity checking of antenatal contact recordings. This study successfully recruited women, including teenagers, from socioeconomically disadvantaged areas; postnatal follow‐up rates were 68.0%, 85.4% and 80.6% at 3‐days, 8‐weeks and 6‐months respectively. Breastfeeding at 8‐weeks was obtained for 95.1% using routine data for non‐responders. It was possible to recruit and train peer supporters to deliver the intervention with adequate fidelity. The ABA intervention was acceptable to women, IFHs and maternity services. There was minimal contamination and no evidence of intervention‐related harm. In conclusion, the intervention is feasible to deliver within an RCT, and a definitive trial required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7038877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70388772020-05-21 The ABA intervention for improving breastfeeding initiation and continuation: Feasibility study results Clarke, Joanne L. Ingram, Jenny Johnson, Debbie Thomson, Gill Trickey, Heather Dombrowski, Stephan U. Sitch, Alice Dykes, Fiona Feltham, Max MacArthur, Christine Roberts, Tracy Hoddinott, Pat Jolly, Kate Matern Child Nutr Original Articles The UK has low breastfeeding rates, with socioeconomic disparities. The Assets‐based feeding help Before and After birth (ABA) intervention was designed to be inclusive and improve infant feeding behaviours. ABA is underpinned by the behaviour change wheel and offers an assets‐based approach focusing on positive capabilities of individuals and communities, including use of a Genogram. This study aimed to investigate feasibility of intervention delivery within a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Nulliparous women ≥16 years, (n = 103) from two English sites were recruited and randomised to either intervention or usual care. The intervention – delivered through face‐to‐face, telephone and text message by trained Infant Feeding Helpers (IFHs) – ran from 30‐weeks' gestation until 5‐months postnatal. Outcomes included recruitment rates and follow‐up at 3‐days, 8‐weeks and 6‐months postnatal, with collection of future full trial outcomes via questionnaires. A mixed‐methods process evaluation included qualitative interviews with 30 women, 13 IFHs and 17 maternity providers; IFH contact logs; and fidelity checking of antenatal contact recordings. This study successfully recruited women, including teenagers, from socioeconomically disadvantaged areas; postnatal follow‐up rates were 68.0%, 85.4% and 80.6% at 3‐days, 8‐weeks and 6‐months respectively. Breastfeeding at 8‐weeks was obtained for 95.1% using routine data for non‐responders. It was possible to recruit and train peer supporters to deliver the intervention with adequate fidelity. The ABA intervention was acceptable to women, IFHs and maternity services. There was minimal contamination and no evidence of intervention‐related harm. In conclusion, the intervention is feasible to deliver within an RCT, and a definitive trial required. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7038877/ /pubmed/31793233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12907 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Maternal & Child Nutrition published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Clarke, Joanne L.
Ingram, Jenny
Johnson, Debbie
Thomson, Gill
Trickey, Heather
Dombrowski, Stephan U.
Sitch, Alice
Dykes, Fiona
Feltham, Max
MacArthur, Christine
Roberts, Tracy
Hoddinott, Pat
Jolly, Kate
The ABA intervention for improving breastfeeding initiation and continuation: Feasibility study results
title The ABA intervention for improving breastfeeding initiation and continuation: Feasibility study results
title_full The ABA intervention for improving breastfeeding initiation and continuation: Feasibility study results
title_fullStr The ABA intervention for improving breastfeeding initiation and continuation: Feasibility study results
title_full_unstemmed The ABA intervention for improving breastfeeding initiation and continuation: Feasibility study results
title_short The ABA intervention for improving breastfeeding initiation and continuation: Feasibility study results
title_sort aba intervention for improving breastfeeding initiation and continuation: feasibility study results
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7038877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31793233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12907
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkejoannel theabainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT ingramjenny theabainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT johnsondebbie theabainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT thomsongill theabainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT trickeyheather theabainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT dombrowskistephanu theabainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT sitchalice theabainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT dykesfiona theabainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT felthammax theabainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT macarthurchristine theabainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT robertstracy theabainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT hoddinottpat theabainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT jollykate theabainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT clarkejoannel abainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT ingramjenny abainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT johnsondebbie abainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT thomsongill abainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT trickeyheather abainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT dombrowskistephanu abainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT sitchalice abainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT dykesfiona abainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT felthammax abainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT macarthurchristine abainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT robertstracy abainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT hoddinottpat abainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults
AT jollykate abainterventionforimprovingbreastfeedinginitiationandcontinuationfeasibilitystudyresults