Cargando…
Quantitative analysis of metabolic parameters at (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in predicting malignant potential of anterior mediastinal tumors
To evaluate the utility of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) for predicting the malignancy of anterior mediastinal tumors, the present study retrospectively examined a total of 105 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection of anterior mediastinal tumors at...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
D.A. Spandidos
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7038926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32194681 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.11276 |
Sumario: | To evaluate the utility of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) for predicting the malignancy of anterior mediastinal tumors, the present study retrospectively examined a total of 105 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection of anterior mediastinal tumors at Gunma University Hospital after undergoing a preoperative FDG-PET scan. Patients were divided into benign and malignant groups in accordance with the following three classification systems: i) Clinical classification, benign or malignant (thymoma and carcinoma); ii) recurrence-based classification, low-risk recurrence (benign and low-risk thymoma) or high-risk recurrence (high-risk thymoma and carcinoma); and iii) pathological classification, benign (benign and thymoma) or malignant (carcinoma). The present study analyzed the differences between the benign and malignant groups in terms of FDG-PET parameters, including maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). The malignant group exhibited a significantly greater SUVmax than the benign group according to all classification systems. By contrast, there was only a slight difference between groups in volume-based metabolic parameters (MTV and TLG) using the clinical classification, and no intergroup differences using the recurrence-based and pathological classifications. The area under the curve in receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis for predicting malignancy was significantly greater for SUVmax than for volume-based metabolic parameters using all classification methods. The respective optimal cut-off value, sensitivity and specificity of SUVmax to predict malignancy were 1.77, 92.0 and 87.0% for the clinical classification, 2.54, 93.6 and 60.3% for the recurrence-based classification, and 5.15, 78.9 and 90.7% for the pathological classification. SUVmax was the most useful parameter for predicting the malignancy of anterior mediastinal tumors. |
---|