Cargando…
Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a companion of choice during labor and birth, to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes and women’s satisfaction with health services. To better understand the status of companion of choice in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), an online survey was...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Organización Panamericana de la Salud
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7039278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32117467 http://dx.doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.19 |
_version_ | 1783500792947277824 |
---|---|
author | De Mucio, Bremen Binfa, Lorena Ortiz, Jovita Portela, Anayda |
author_facet | De Mucio, Bremen Binfa, Lorena Ortiz, Jovita Portela, Anayda |
author_sort | De Mucio, Bremen |
collection | PubMed |
description | The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a companion of choice during labor and birth, to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes and women’s satisfaction with health services. To better understand the status of companion of choice in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), an online survey was conducted with members of a midwifery virtual community of practice and with key informants, aiming to identify: 1) existing regulatory instruments related to companion of choice in the countries where the members are practicing; and, 2) key characteristics of implementation of companion of choice, where regulation exists. Responses (n = 112) were received from representatives of 20 of the 43 countries of LAC. Respondents reported existence of a national policy or legislation in seven countries, ministerial norms or institutional protocols in five countries, and no existing policy/protocol in eight countries. Respondents from the same country often provided contradictory responses. Responses differed from information provided by ministries of health in a WHO-led global policy survey in 11 instances. These variations may reflect that midwives were not always aware of the national policy/guideline in their country. We propose that a more robust effort should be undertaken to understand the status of companion of choice for labor and birth in LAC countries, at national, regional, and local level, in public and private facilities. It is important to know if policies exist, at what level of the system, and if key stakeholders, maternity-care health providers, and women are aware of their existence. Efforts should also be made to understand barriers to implementing companion of choice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7039278 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Organización Panamericana de la Salud |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70392782020-03-01 Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges De Mucio, Bremen Binfa, Lorena Ortiz, Jovita Portela, Anayda Rev Panam Salud Publica Special Report The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a companion of choice during labor and birth, to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes and women’s satisfaction with health services. To better understand the status of companion of choice in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), an online survey was conducted with members of a midwifery virtual community of practice and with key informants, aiming to identify: 1) existing regulatory instruments related to companion of choice in the countries where the members are practicing; and, 2) key characteristics of implementation of companion of choice, where regulation exists. Responses (n = 112) were received from representatives of 20 of the 43 countries of LAC. Respondents reported existence of a national policy or legislation in seven countries, ministerial norms or institutional protocols in five countries, and no existing policy/protocol in eight countries. Respondents from the same country often provided contradictory responses. Responses differed from information provided by ministries of health in a WHO-led global policy survey in 11 instances. These variations may reflect that midwives were not always aware of the national policy/guideline in their country. We propose that a more robust effort should be undertaken to understand the status of companion of choice for labor and birth in LAC countries, at national, regional, and local level, in public and private facilities. It is important to know if policies exist, at what level of the system, and if key stakeholders, maternity-care health providers, and women are aware of their existence. Efforts should also be made to understand barriers to implementing companion of choice. Organización Panamericana de la Salud 2020-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7039278/ /pubmed/32117467 http://dx.doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.19 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 IGO License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. No modifications or commercial use of this article are permitted. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that PAHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the PAHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s original URL. |
spellingShingle | Special Report De Mucio, Bremen Binfa, Lorena Ortiz, Jovita Portela, Anayda Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges |
title | Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges |
title_full | Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges |
title_fullStr | Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges |
title_full_unstemmed | Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges |
title_short | Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges |
title_sort | status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in latin america and the caribbean: gaps and challenges |
topic | Special Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7039278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32117467 http://dx.doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demuciobremen statusofnationalpolicyoncompanionofchoiceatbirthinlatinamericaandthecaribbeangapsandchallenges AT binfalorena statusofnationalpolicyoncompanionofchoiceatbirthinlatinamericaandthecaribbeangapsandchallenges AT ortizjovita statusofnationalpolicyoncompanionofchoiceatbirthinlatinamericaandthecaribbeangapsandchallenges AT portelaanayda statusofnationalpolicyoncompanionofchoiceatbirthinlatinamericaandthecaribbeangapsandchallenges |