Cargando…

Perspective-taking increases emotionality and empathy but does not reduce harmful biases against American Indians: Converging evidence from the museum and lab

Given the problematic depictions of Native Americans and the pervasive cultural biases that exist, we sought to understand how contemporary educational practices in museums might encourage viewers to consider the context of their preconceptions rather than passively absorb conventional representatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sherman, Aleksandra, Cupo, Lani, Mithlo, Nancy Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7039430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32092065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228784
_version_ 1783500813140754432
author Sherman, Aleksandra
Cupo, Lani
Mithlo, Nancy Marie
author_facet Sherman, Aleksandra
Cupo, Lani
Mithlo, Nancy Marie
author_sort Sherman, Aleksandra
collection PubMed
description Given the problematic depictions of Native Americans and the pervasive cultural biases that exist, we sought to understand how contemporary educational practices in museums might encourage viewers to consider the context of their preconceptions rather than passively absorb conventional representations. In this two-part study, we tested whether and how viewers (mis)perceptions and interpretations of Native peoples might be influenced by encouraging empathy—specifically by taking the perspective of a Native individual depicted in a photograph they are visually analyzing. We randomly assigned participants in a lab setting (N = 120) and in a museum setting (N = 75) to one of three conditions (perspective-taking, stereotype-suppression, or control), and examined eye movements, self-reports, and verbal and written responses while participants viewed portrait photographs of American Indians. Notably, perspective-taking led viewers to interpret American Indians in a more emotional, empathetic, and human-centered manner than in control and suppression conditions. This was reflected in eye movements such that control and suppression participants attended to decorative features (e.g. jewelry) more than to the eyes of the depicted individual, whereas perspective-takers’ attention was more balanced. Similarly, perspective-takers used more empathetic and emotion-related language, whereas participants in control and suppression groups used more “objective” visually-descriptive language. Crucially, regardless of condition, cultural biases were stubbornly resistant to change and, in some cases, appeared even more frequently for participants adopting others’ perspectives. We argue that despite the positive outcomes associated with perspective-taking, the continued presence of cultural biases across conditions demonstrates that cultural competency-based interventions must be more complex and culturally-specific.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7039430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70394302020-03-06 Perspective-taking increases emotionality and empathy but does not reduce harmful biases against American Indians: Converging evidence from the museum and lab Sherman, Aleksandra Cupo, Lani Mithlo, Nancy Marie PLoS One Research Article Given the problematic depictions of Native Americans and the pervasive cultural biases that exist, we sought to understand how contemporary educational practices in museums might encourage viewers to consider the context of their preconceptions rather than passively absorb conventional representations. In this two-part study, we tested whether and how viewers (mis)perceptions and interpretations of Native peoples might be influenced by encouraging empathy—specifically by taking the perspective of a Native individual depicted in a photograph they are visually analyzing. We randomly assigned participants in a lab setting (N = 120) and in a museum setting (N = 75) to one of three conditions (perspective-taking, stereotype-suppression, or control), and examined eye movements, self-reports, and verbal and written responses while participants viewed portrait photographs of American Indians. Notably, perspective-taking led viewers to interpret American Indians in a more emotional, empathetic, and human-centered manner than in control and suppression conditions. This was reflected in eye movements such that control and suppression participants attended to decorative features (e.g. jewelry) more than to the eyes of the depicted individual, whereas perspective-takers’ attention was more balanced. Similarly, perspective-takers used more empathetic and emotion-related language, whereas participants in control and suppression groups used more “objective” visually-descriptive language. Crucially, regardless of condition, cultural biases were stubbornly resistant to change and, in some cases, appeared even more frequently for participants adopting others’ perspectives. We argue that despite the positive outcomes associated with perspective-taking, the continued presence of cultural biases across conditions demonstrates that cultural competency-based interventions must be more complex and culturally-specific. Public Library of Science 2020-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7039430/ /pubmed/32092065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228784 Text en © 2020 Sherman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sherman, Aleksandra
Cupo, Lani
Mithlo, Nancy Marie
Perspective-taking increases emotionality and empathy but does not reduce harmful biases against American Indians: Converging evidence from the museum and lab
title Perspective-taking increases emotionality and empathy but does not reduce harmful biases against American Indians: Converging evidence from the museum and lab
title_full Perspective-taking increases emotionality and empathy but does not reduce harmful biases against American Indians: Converging evidence from the museum and lab
title_fullStr Perspective-taking increases emotionality and empathy but does not reduce harmful biases against American Indians: Converging evidence from the museum and lab
title_full_unstemmed Perspective-taking increases emotionality and empathy but does not reduce harmful biases against American Indians: Converging evidence from the museum and lab
title_short Perspective-taking increases emotionality and empathy but does not reduce harmful biases against American Indians: Converging evidence from the museum and lab
title_sort perspective-taking increases emotionality and empathy but does not reduce harmful biases against american indians: converging evidence from the museum and lab
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7039430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32092065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228784
work_keys_str_mv AT shermanaleksandra perspectivetakingincreasesemotionalityandempathybutdoesnotreduceharmfulbiasesagainstamericanindiansconvergingevidencefromthemuseumandlab
AT cupolani perspectivetakingincreasesemotionalityandempathybutdoesnotreduceharmfulbiasesagainstamericanindiansconvergingevidencefromthemuseumandlab
AT mithlonancymarie perspectivetakingincreasesemotionalityandempathybutdoesnotreduceharmfulbiasesagainstamericanindiansconvergingevidencefromthemuseumandlab