Cargando…
Practice recommendations for the use of sedation in routine hospital-based colonoscopy
OBJECTIVE: Although sedation improves patient experience during colonoscopy, there is great jurisdictional variability in sedative practices. The objective of this study was to develop practice recommendations for the use of moderate and deep sedation in routine hospital-based colonoscopy to facilit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7039579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000348 |
_version_ | 1783500828961669120 |
---|---|
author | Dossa, Fahima Dubé, Catherine Tinmouth, Jill Sorvari, Anne Rabeneck, Linda McCurdy, Bronwen R Dominitz, Jason A Baxter, Nancy N |
author_facet | Dossa, Fahima Dubé, Catherine Tinmouth, Jill Sorvari, Anne Rabeneck, Linda McCurdy, Bronwen R Dominitz, Jason A Baxter, Nancy N |
author_sort | Dossa, Fahima |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Although sedation improves patient experience during colonoscopy, there is great jurisdictional variability in sedative practices. The objective of this study was to develop practice recommendations for the use of moderate and deep sedation in routine hospital-based colonoscopy to facilitate standardisation of practice. DESIGN: We recruited 32 multidisciplinary panellists to participate in a modified Delphi process to establish consensus-based recommendations for the use of sedation in colonoscopy. Panel members participated in a values assessment survey followed by two rounds of anonymous online voting on preliminary practice recommendations. An inperson meeting was held between voting rounds to facilitate consensus-building. Consensus was defined as >60% agreement/disagreement with recommendation statements; >80% agreement/disagreement was considered indicative of strong consensus. RESULTS: Twenty-nine panellists participated in the values assessment survey. Panellists ranked all factors presented as important to the development of practice recommendations. The factor considered most important was patient safety. Patient satisfaction, procedural efficiency, and cost were considered less important. Strong consensus was achieved for all nine practice recommendations presented to the panel. These recommendations included that all endoscopists be able to perform colonoscopy with moderate sedation, that an endoscopist and a single trained nurse are sufficient for performing colonoscopy with moderate sedation, and that anaesthesia-provided deep sedation be used for select patients. CONCLUSION: The recommendations presented in this study were agreed on by a multidisciplinary group and provide guidance for the use of sedation in routine hospital-based colonoscopy. Standardised sedation practices will promote safe, effective, and efficient colonoscopy for all patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7039579 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70395792020-03-03 Practice recommendations for the use of sedation in routine hospital-based colonoscopy Dossa, Fahima Dubé, Catherine Tinmouth, Jill Sorvari, Anne Rabeneck, Linda McCurdy, Bronwen R Dominitz, Jason A Baxter, Nancy N BMJ Open Gastroenterol Endoscopy OBJECTIVE: Although sedation improves patient experience during colonoscopy, there is great jurisdictional variability in sedative practices. The objective of this study was to develop practice recommendations for the use of moderate and deep sedation in routine hospital-based colonoscopy to facilitate standardisation of practice. DESIGN: We recruited 32 multidisciplinary panellists to participate in a modified Delphi process to establish consensus-based recommendations for the use of sedation in colonoscopy. Panel members participated in a values assessment survey followed by two rounds of anonymous online voting on preliminary practice recommendations. An inperson meeting was held between voting rounds to facilitate consensus-building. Consensus was defined as >60% agreement/disagreement with recommendation statements; >80% agreement/disagreement was considered indicative of strong consensus. RESULTS: Twenty-nine panellists participated in the values assessment survey. Panellists ranked all factors presented as important to the development of practice recommendations. The factor considered most important was patient safety. Patient satisfaction, procedural efficiency, and cost were considered less important. Strong consensus was achieved for all nine practice recommendations presented to the panel. These recommendations included that all endoscopists be able to perform colonoscopy with moderate sedation, that an endoscopist and a single trained nurse are sufficient for performing colonoscopy with moderate sedation, and that anaesthesia-provided deep sedation be used for select patients. CONCLUSION: The recommendations presented in this study were agreed on by a multidisciplinary group and provide guidance for the use of sedation in routine hospital-based colonoscopy. Standardised sedation practices will promote safe, effective, and efficient colonoscopy for all patients. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7039579/ /pubmed/32128226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000348 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Endoscopy Dossa, Fahima Dubé, Catherine Tinmouth, Jill Sorvari, Anne Rabeneck, Linda McCurdy, Bronwen R Dominitz, Jason A Baxter, Nancy N Practice recommendations for the use of sedation in routine hospital-based colonoscopy |
title | Practice recommendations for the use of sedation in routine hospital-based colonoscopy |
title_full | Practice recommendations for the use of sedation in routine hospital-based colonoscopy |
title_fullStr | Practice recommendations for the use of sedation in routine hospital-based colonoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Practice recommendations for the use of sedation in routine hospital-based colonoscopy |
title_short | Practice recommendations for the use of sedation in routine hospital-based colonoscopy |
title_sort | practice recommendations for the use of sedation in routine hospital-based colonoscopy |
topic | Endoscopy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7039579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000348 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dossafahima practicerecommendationsfortheuseofsedationinroutinehospitalbasedcolonoscopy AT dubecatherine practicerecommendationsfortheuseofsedationinroutinehospitalbasedcolonoscopy AT tinmouthjill practicerecommendationsfortheuseofsedationinroutinehospitalbasedcolonoscopy AT sorvarianne practicerecommendationsfortheuseofsedationinroutinehospitalbasedcolonoscopy AT rabenecklinda practicerecommendationsfortheuseofsedationinroutinehospitalbasedcolonoscopy AT mccurdybronwenr practicerecommendationsfortheuseofsedationinroutinehospitalbasedcolonoscopy AT dominitzjasona practicerecommendationsfortheuseofsedationinroutinehospitalbasedcolonoscopy AT baxternancyn practicerecommendationsfortheuseofsedationinroutinehospitalbasedcolonoscopy |