Cargando…

The distinct spatiotemporal distribution and effect of feed restriction on mtDNA copy number in broilers

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number reflects the abundance of mitochondria in cells and is dependent on the energy requirements of tissues. We hypothesized that the mtDNA copy number in poultry may change with age and tissue, and feed restriction may affect the growth and health of poultry by chan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xiangli, Wang, Ting, Ji, Jiefei, Wang, Huanjie, Zhu, Xinghao, Du, Pengfei, Zhu, Yao, Huang, Yanqun, Chen, Wen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7039872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32094402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60123-1
_version_ 1783500869985107968
author Zhang, Xiangli
Wang, Ting
Ji, Jiefei
Wang, Huanjie
Zhu, Xinghao
Du, Pengfei
Zhu, Yao
Huang, Yanqun
Chen, Wen
author_facet Zhang, Xiangli
Wang, Ting
Ji, Jiefei
Wang, Huanjie
Zhu, Xinghao
Du, Pengfei
Zhu, Yao
Huang, Yanqun
Chen, Wen
author_sort Zhang, Xiangli
collection PubMed
description Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number reflects the abundance of mitochondria in cells and is dependent on the energy requirements of tissues. We hypothesized that the mtDNA copy number in poultry may change with age and tissue, and feed restriction may affect the growth and health of poultry by changing mtDNA content in a tissue-specific pattern. TaqMan real-time PCR was used to quantify mtDNA copy number using three different segments of the mitochondrial genome (D-loop, ATP6, and ND6) relative to the nuclear single-copy preproglucagon gene (GCG). The effect of sex, age, and dietary restriction (quantitative, energy, and protein restriction) on mtDNA copy number variation in the tissues of broilers was investigated. We found that mtDNA copy number varied among tissues (P < 0.01) and presented a distinct change in spatiotemporal pattern. After hatching, the number of mtDNA copies significantly decreased with age in the liver and increased in muscle tissues, including heart, pectoralis, and leg muscles. Newborn broilers (unfed) and embryos (E 11 and E 17) had similar mtDNA contents in muscle tissues. Among 42 d broilers, females had a higher mtDNA copy number than males in the tissues examined. Feed restriction (8–21 d) significantly reduced the body weight but did not significantly change the mtDNA copy number of 21 d broilers. After three weeks of compensatory growth (22–42 d), only the body weight of broilers with a quantitatively restricted diet remained significantly lower than that of broilers in the control group (P < 0.05), while any type of early feed restriction significantly reduced the mtDNA copy number in muscle tissues of 42 d broilers. In summary, the mtDNA copy number of broilers was regulated in a tissue- and age-specific manner. A similar pattern of spatiotemporal change in response to early feed restriction was found in the mtDNA content of muscle tissues, including cardiac and skeletal muscle, whereas liver mtDNA content changed differently with age and dietary restriction. It seems that early restrictions in feed could effectively lower the mtDNA content in muscle cells to reduce the tissue overload in broilers at 42 d to some degree.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7039872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70398722020-02-28 The distinct spatiotemporal distribution and effect of feed restriction on mtDNA copy number in broilers Zhang, Xiangli Wang, Ting Ji, Jiefei Wang, Huanjie Zhu, Xinghao Du, Pengfei Zhu, Yao Huang, Yanqun Chen, Wen Sci Rep Article Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number reflects the abundance of mitochondria in cells and is dependent on the energy requirements of tissues. We hypothesized that the mtDNA copy number in poultry may change with age and tissue, and feed restriction may affect the growth and health of poultry by changing mtDNA content in a tissue-specific pattern. TaqMan real-time PCR was used to quantify mtDNA copy number using three different segments of the mitochondrial genome (D-loop, ATP6, and ND6) relative to the nuclear single-copy preproglucagon gene (GCG). The effect of sex, age, and dietary restriction (quantitative, energy, and protein restriction) on mtDNA copy number variation in the tissues of broilers was investigated. We found that mtDNA copy number varied among tissues (P < 0.01) and presented a distinct change in spatiotemporal pattern. After hatching, the number of mtDNA copies significantly decreased with age in the liver and increased in muscle tissues, including heart, pectoralis, and leg muscles. Newborn broilers (unfed) and embryos (E 11 and E 17) had similar mtDNA contents in muscle tissues. Among 42 d broilers, females had a higher mtDNA copy number than males in the tissues examined. Feed restriction (8–21 d) significantly reduced the body weight but did not significantly change the mtDNA copy number of 21 d broilers. After three weeks of compensatory growth (22–42 d), only the body weight of broilers with a quantitatively restricted diet remained significantly lower than that of broilers in the control group (P < 0.05), while any type of early feed restriction significantly reduced the mtDNA copy number in muscle tissues of 42 d broilers. In summary, the mtDNA copy number of broilers was regulated in a tissue- and age-specific manner. A similar pattern of spatiotemporal change in response to early feed restriction was found in the mtDNA content of muscle tissues, including cardiac and skeletal muscle, whereas liver mtDNA content changed differently with age and dietary restriction. It seems that early restrictions in feed could effectively lower the mtDNA content in muscle cells to reduce the tissue overload in broilers at 42 d to some degree. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7039872/ /pubmed/32094402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60123-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Xiangli
Wang, Ting
Ji, Jiefei
Wang, Huanjie
Zhu, Xinghao
Du, Pengfei
Zhu, Yao
Huang, Yanqun
Chen, Wen
The distinct spatiotemporal distribution and effect of feed restriction on mtDNA copy number in broilers
title The distinct spatiotemporal distribution and effect of feed restriction on mtDNA copy number in broilers
title_full The distinct spatiotemporal distribution and effect of feed restriction on mtDNA copy number in broilers
title_fullStr The distinct spatiotemporal distribution and effect of feed restriction on mtDNA copy number in broilers
title_full_unstemmed The distinct spatiotemporal distribution and effect of feed restriction on mtDNA copy number in broilers
title_short The distinct spatiotemporal distribution and effect of feed restriction on mtDNA copy number in broilers
title_sort distinct spatiotemporal distribution and effect of feed restriction on mtdna copy number in broilers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7039872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32094402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60123-1
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxiangli thedistinctspatiotemporaldistributionandeffectoffeedrestrictiononmtdnacopynumberinbroilers
AT wangting thedistinctspatiotemporaldistributionandeffectoffeedrestrictiononmtdnacopynumberinbroilers
AT jijiefei thedistinctspatiotemporaldistributionandeffectoffeedrestrictiononmtdnacopynumberinbroilers
AT wanghuanjie thedistinctspatiotemporaldistributionandeffectoffeedrestrictiononmtdnacopynumberinbroilers
AT zhuxinghao thedistinctspatiotemporaldistributionandeffectoffeedrestrictiononmtdnacopynumberinbroilers
AT dupengfei thedistinctspatiotemporaldistributionandeffectoffeedrestrictiononmtdnacopynumberinbroilers
AT zhuyao thedistinctspatiotemporaldistributionandeffectoffeedrestrictiononmtdnacopynumberinbroilers
AT huangyanqun thedistinctspatiotemporaldistributionandeffectoffeedrestrictiononmtdnacopynumberinbroilers
AT chenwen thedistinctspatiotemporaldistributionandeffectoffeedrestrictiononmtdnacopynumberinbroilers
AT zhangxiangli distinctspatiotemporaldistributionandeffectoffeedrestrictiononmtdnacopynumberinbroilers
AT wangting distinctspatiotemporaldistributionandeffectoffeedrestrictiononmtdnacopynumberinbroilers
AT jijiefei distinctspatiotemporaldistributionandeffectoffeedrestrictiononmtdnacopynumberinbroilers
AT wanghuanjie distinctspatiotemporaldistributionandeffectoffeedrestrictiononmtdnacopynumberinbroilers
AT zhuxinghao distinctspatiotemporaldistributionandeffectoffeedrestrictiononmtdnacopynumberinbroilers
AT dupengfei distinctspatiotemporaldistributionandeffectoffeedrestrictiononmtdnacopynumberinbroilers
AT zhuyao distinctspatiotemporaldistributionandeffectoffeedrestrictiononmtdnacopynumberinbroilers
AT huangyanqun distinctspatiotemporaldistributionandeffectoffeedrestrictiononmtdnacopynumberinbroilers
AT chenwen distinctspatiotemporaldistributionandeffectoffeedrestrictiononmtdnacopynumberinbroilers