Cargando…

Prediction of the Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth: Clinical Applicability of two Analytical Cochlear Models

Although the spiral anatomy of the human cochlea seems evident, measuring the highly inter-variable true dimensions is still challenging. Today, only a few three-dimensional reconstruction models of the inner ear are available. Previously, spiral equations were applied to two-dimensional computed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mertens, G., Van Rompaey, V., Van de Heyning, P., Gorris, E., Topsakal, V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7039896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32094372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58648-6
_version_ 1783500875633786880
author Mertens, G.
Van Rompaey, V.
Van de Heyning, P.
Gorris, E.
Topsakal, V.
author_facet Mertens, G.
Van Rompaey, V.
Van de Heyning, P.
Gorris, E.
Topsakal, V.
author_sort Mertens, G.
collection PubMed
description Although the spiral anatomy of the human cochlea seems evident, measuring the highly inter-variable true dimensions is still challenging. Today, only a few three-dimensional reconstruction models of the inner ear are available. Previously, spiral equations were applied to two-dimensional computed tomography (CT) images to predict the electrode insertion depth prior to cochlear implantation. The study aimed primarily to compare the clinical applicability of two analytical cochlear models using a recently introduced planning software to predict the insertion depth of the electrode array of 46 cochlear implant recipients. One was based upon the Escudé formula, which relies only on the basal turn diameter, and another based upon the Elliptic-Circular Approximation (ECA), using the diameter and width. Each case was measured twice by two ENT surgeons. Secondly, in order to measure the benefit of the new planning software over the use of the existing clinical routine method, the results were compared to the prediction based upon a two-dimensional CT image. The intra -and inter-observer agreement using the planning software was significantly better when the ECA was applied, compared to the Escudé formula (p < 0.01). As a reference, the predicted insertion depth was compared to the actual insertion depth measured on post-operative images. The mean absolute error was |2.36| (|1.11|) mm in case of the Escudé approach and |1.19| (|0.92|) mm in case of the ECA. The use of a new planning software that allows three-dimensional handling, integrating the diameter and width of the basal turn (ECA formula), resulted in the most accurate predictions of the electrode insertion depths.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7039896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70398962020-02-28 Prediction of the Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth: Clinical Applicability of two Analytical Cochlear Models Mertens, G. Van Rompaey, V. Van de Heyning, P. Gorris, E. Topsakal, V. Sci Rep Article Although the spiral anatomy of the human cochlea seems evident, measuring the highly inter-variable true dimensions is still challenging. Today, only a few three-dimensional reconstruction models of the inner ear are available. Previously, spiral equations were applied to two-dimensional computed tomography (CT) images to predict the electrode insertion depth prior to cochlear implantation. The study aimed primarily to compare the clinical applicability of two analytical cochlear models using a recently introduced planning software to predict the insertion depth of the electrode array of 46 cochlear implant recipients. One was based upon the Escudé formula, which relies only on the basal turn diameter, and another based upon the Elliptic-Circular Approximation (ECA), using the diameter and width. Each case was measured twice by two ENT surgeons. Secondly, in order to measure the benefit of the new planning software over the use of the existing clinical routine method, the results were compared to the prediction based upon a two-dimensional CT image. The intra -and inter-observer agreement using the planning software was significantly better when the ECA was applied, compared to the Escudé formula (p < 0.01). As a reference, the predicted insertion depth was compared to the actual insertion depth measured on post-operative images. The mean absolute error was |2.36| (|1.11|) mm in case of the Escudé approach and |1.19| (|0.92|) mm in case of the ECA. The use of a new planning software that allows three-dimensional handling, integrating the diameter and width of the basal turn (ECA formula), resulted in the most accurate predictions of the electrode insertion depths. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7039896/ /pubmed/32094372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58648-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Mertens, G.
Van Rompaey, V.
Van de Heyning, P.
Gorris, E.
Topsakal, V.
Prediction of the Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth: Clinical Applicability of two Analytical Cochlear Models
title Prediction of the Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth: Clinical Applicability of two Analytical Cochlear Models
title_full Prediction of the Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth: Clinical Applicability of two Analytical Cochlear Models
title_fullStr Prediction of the Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth: Clinical Applicability of two Analytical Cochlear Models
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of the Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth: Clinical Applicability of two Analytical Cochlear Models
title_short Prediction of the Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth: Clinical Applicability of two Analytical Cochlear Models
title_sort prediction of the cochlear implant electrode insertion depth: clinical applicability of two analytical cochlear models
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7039896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32094372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58648-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mertensg predictionofthecochlearimplantelectrodeinsertiondepthclinicalapplicabilityoftwoanalyticalcochlearmodels
AT vanrompaeyv predictionofthecochlearimplantelectrodeinsertiondepthclinicalapplicabilityoftwoanalyticalcochlearmodels
AT vandeheyningp predictionofthecochlearimplantelectrodeinsertiondepthclinicalapplicabilityoftwoanalyticalcochlearmodels
AT gorrise predictionofthecochlearimplantelectrodeinsertiondepthclinicalapplicabilityoftwoanalyticalcochlearmodels
AT topsakalv predictionofthecochlearimplantelectrodeinsertiondepthclinicalapplicabilityoftwoanalyticalcochlearmodels