Cargando…

Novel prognostic model for stratifying survival in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients

PURPOSE: We combined conventional clinical and pathological characteristics and pathological architectural grading scores to develop a prognostic model to identify a specific group of patients with stage I lung adenocarcinomas with poor survival following surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Di-Han, Ye, Zheng-Hao, Chen, Si, Sun, Xue-Song, Hou, Jing-Yu, Zhao, Ze-Rui, Long, Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31884561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-03110-y
_version_ 1783500918710337536
author Liu, Di-Han
Ye, Zheng-Hao
Chen, Si
Sun, Xue-Song
Hou, Jing-Yu
Zhao, Ze-Rui
Long, Hao
author_facet Liu, Di-Han
Ye, Zheng-Hao
Chen, Si
Sun, Xue-Song
Hou, Jing-Yu
Zhao, Ze-Rui
Long, Hao
author_sort Liu, Di-Han
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We combined conventional clinical and pathological characteristics and pathological architectural grading scores to develop a prognostic model to identify a specific group of patients with stage I lung adenocarcinomas with poor survival following surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study included 198 patients with stage I lung adenocarcinomas recruited from 2004 to 2013. Multivariate analyses were used to confirm independent risk factors, which were checked for internal validity using the bootstrapping method. The prognostic scores, derived from β-coefficients using the Cox regression model, classified patients into high- and low-risk groups. The predictive performance and discriminative ability of the model were assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), concordance index (C-index) and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses. RESULTS: Three risk factors were identified: T2 (rounding of β-coefficients = 81), necrosis (rounding of β-coefficients = 67), and pathological architectural score of 5–6 (rounding of β-coefficients = 58). The final prognostic score was the sum of points. The derived prognostic scores stratified patients into low- (score ≤ 103) and high- (score > 103) risk groups, with significant differences in 5-year overall survival (high vs. low risk: 49.3% vs. 88.0%, respectively; hazard ratio: 4.55; p < 0.001). The AUC for the proposed model was 0.717. The C-index of the model was 0.693. CONCLUSION: An integrated prognostic model was developed to discriminate resected stage I adenocarcinoma patients into low- and high-risk groups, which will help clinicians select individual treatment strategies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00432-019-03110-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7040084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70400842020-03-10 Novel prognostic model for stratifying survival in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients Liu, Di-Han Ye, Zheng-Hao Chen, Si Sun, Xue-Song Hou, Jing-Yu Zhao, Ze-Rui Long, Hao J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Article – Clinical Oncology PURPOSE: We combined conventional clinical and pathological characteristics and pathological architectural grading scores to develop a prognostic model to identify a specific group of patients with stage I lung adenocarcinomas with poor survival following surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study included 198 patients with stage I lung adenocarcinomas recruited from 2004 to 2013. Multivariate analyses were used to confirm independent risk factors, which were checked for internal validity using the bootstrapping method. The prognostic scores, derived from β-coefficients using the Cox regression model, classified patients into high- and low-risk groups. The predictive performance and discriminative ability of the model were assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), concordance index (C-index) and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses. RESULTS: Three risk factors were identified: T2 (rounding of β-coefficients = 81), necrosis (rounding of β-coefficients = 67), and pathological architectural score of 5–6 (rounding of β-coefficients = 58). The final prognostic score was the sum of points. The derived prognostic scores stratified patients into low- (score ≤ 103) and high- (score > 103) risk groups, with significant differences in 5-year overall survival (high vs. low risk: 49.3% vs. 88.0%, respectively; hazard ratio: 4.55; p < 0.001). The AUC for the proposed model was 0.717. The C-index of the model was 0.693. CONCLUSION: An integrated prognostic model was developed to discriminate resected stage I adenocarcinoma patients into low- and high-risk groups, which will help clinicians select individual treatment strategies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00432-019-03110-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-12-28 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7040084/ /pubmed/31884561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-03110-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article – Clinical Oncology
Liu, Di-Han
Ye, Zheng-Hao
Chen, Si
Sun, Xue-Song
Hou, Jing-Yu
Zhao, Ze-Rui
Long, Hao
Novel prognostic model for stratifying survival in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients
title Novel prognostic model for stratifying survival in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients
title_full Novel prognostic model for stratifying survival in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients
title_fullStr Novel prognostic model for stratifying survival in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients
title_full_unstemmed Novel prognostic model for stratifying survival in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients
title_short Novel prognostic model for stratifying survival in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients
title_sort novel prognostic model for stratifying survival in stage i lung adenocarcinoma patients
topic Original Article – Clinical Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31884561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-03110-y
work_keys_str_mv AT liudihan novelprognosticmodelforstratifyingsurvivalinstageilungadenocarcinomapatients
AT yezhenghao novelprognosticmodelforstratifyingsurvivalinstageilungadenocarcinomapatients
AT chensi novelprognosticmodelforstratifyingsurvivalinstageilungadenocarcinomapatients
AT sunxuesong novelprognosticmodelforstratifyingsurvivalinstageilungadenocarcinomapatients
AT houjingyu novelprognosticmodelforstratifyingsurvivalinstageilungadenocarcinomapatients
AT zhaozerui novelprognosticmodelforstratifyingsurvivalinstageilungadenocarcinomapatients
AT longhao novelprognosticmodelforstratifyingsurvivalinstageilungadenocarcinomapatients