Cargando…
Novel prognostic model for stratifying survival in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients
PURPOSE: We combined conventional clinical and pathological characteristics and pathological architectural grading scores to develop a prognostic model to identify a specific group of patients with stage I lung adenocarcinomas with poor survival following surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31884561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-03110-y |
_version_ | 1783500918710337536 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Di-Han Ye, Zheng-Hao Chen, Si Sun, Xue-Song Hou, Jing-Yu Zhao, Ze-Rui Long, Hao |
author_facet | Liu, Di-Han Ye, Zheng-Hao Chen, Si Sun, Xue-Song Hou, Jing-Yu Zhao, Ze-Rui Long, Hao |
author_sort | Liu, Di-Han |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We combined conventional clinical and pathological characteristics and pathological architectural grading scores to develop a prognostic model to identify a specific group of patients with stage I lung adenocarcinomas with poor survival following surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study included 198 patients with stage I lung adenocarcinomas recruited from 2004 to 2013. Multivariate analyses were used to confirm independent risk factors, which were checked for internal validity using the bootstrapping method. The prognostic scores, derived from β-coefficients using the Cox regression model, classified patients into high- and low-risk groups. The predictive performance and discriminative ability of the model were assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), concordance index (C-index) and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses. RESULTS: Three risk factors were identified: T2 (rounding of β-coefficients = 81), necrosis (rounding of β-coefficients = 67), and pathological architectural score of 5–6 (rounding of β-coefficients = 58). The final prognostic score was the sum of points. The derived prognostic scores stratified patients into low- (score ≤ 103) and high- (score > 103) risk groups, with significant differences in 5-year overall survival (high vs. low risk: 49.3% vs. 88.0%, respectively; hazard ratio: 4.55; p < 0.001). The AUC for the proposed model was 0.717. The C-index of the model was 0.693. CONCLUSION: An integrated prognostic model was developed to discriminate resected stage I adenocarcinoma patients into low- and high-risk groups, which will help clinicians select individual treatment strategies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00432-019-03110-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7040084 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70400842020-03-10 Novel prognostic model for stratifying survival in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients Liu, Di-Han Ye, Zheng-Hao Chen, Si Sun, Xue-Song Hou, Jing-Yu Zhao, Ze-Rui Long, Hao J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Article – Clinical Oncology PURPOSE: We combined conventional clinical and pathological characteristics and pathological architectural grading scores to develop a prognostic model to identify a specific group of patients with stage I lung adenocarcinomas with poor survival following surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study included 198 patients with stage I lung adenocarcinomas recruited from 2004 to 2013. Multivariate analyses were used to confirm independent risk factors, which were checked for internal validity using the bootstrapping method. The prognostic scores, derived from β-coefficients using the Cox regression model, classified patients into high- and low-risk groups. The predictive performance and discriminative ability of the model were assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), concordance index (C-index) and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses. RESULTS: Three risk factors were identified: T2 (rounding of β-coefficients = 81), necrosis (rounding of β-coefficients = 67), and pathological architectural score of 5–6 (rounding of β-coefficients = 58). The final prognostic score was the sum of points. The derived prognostic scores stratified patients into low- (score ≤ 103) and high- (score > 103) risk groups, with significant differences in 5-year overall survival (high vs. low risk: 49.3% vs. 88.0%, respectively; hazard ratio: 4.55; p < 0.001). The AUC for the proposed model was 0.717. The C-index of the model was 0.693. CONCLUSION: An integrated prognostic model was developed to discriminate resected stage I adenocarcinoma patients into low- and high-risk groups, which will help clinicians select individual treatment strategies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00432-019-03110-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-12-28 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7040084/ /pubmed/31884561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-03110-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article – Clinical Oncology Liu, Di-Han Ye, Zheng-Hao Chen, Si Sun, Xue-Song Hou, Jing-Yu Zhao, Ze-Rui Long, Hao Novel prognostic model for stratifying survival in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients |
title | Novel prognostic model for stratifying survival in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients |
title_full | Novel prognostic model for stratifying survival in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients |
title_fullStr | Novel prognostic model for stratifying survival in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Novel prognostic model for stratifying survival in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients |
title_short | Novel prognostic model for stratifying survival in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients |
title_sort | novel prognostic model for stratifying survival in stage i lung adenocarcinoma patients |
topic | Original Article – Clinical Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31884561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-03110-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liudihan novelprognosticmodelforstratifyingsurvivalinstageilungadenocarcinomapatients AT yezhenghao novelprognosticmodelforstratifyingsurvivalinstageilungadenocarcinomapatients AT chensi novelprognosticmodelforstratifyingsurvivalinstageilungadenocarcinomapatients AT sunxuesong novelprognosticmodelforstratifyingsurvivalinstageilungadenocarcinomapatients AT houjingyu novelprognosticmodelforstratifyingsurvivalinstageilungadenocarcinomapatients AT zhaozerui novelprognosticmodelforstratifyingsurvivalinstageilungadenocarcinomapatients AT longhao novelprognosticmodelforstratifyingsurvivalinstageilungadenocarcinomapatients |