Cargando…

Comparison of sensitivity of bacteria isolated in odontogenic infections to ceftriaxone and amoxicillin-clavulanate

BACKGROUND: Odontogenic infections is a cause of mortality and morbidity in maxillofacial patients. This is largely due to resistance of organisms to antibiotics prescribed. OBJECTIVES: To isolate organisms involved in odontogenic infections and compare the sensitivity of the organisms to Ceftriaxon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adamson, Olawale Olatunbosun, Adeyemi, Michael Olayinka, Gbotolorun, Olalekan Micah, Oduyebo, Omoniyi Omolola, Odeniyi, Olalekan, Adeyemo, Wasiu Lanre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Makerere Medical School 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32127812
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v19i3.15
_version_ 1783500949218656256
author Adamson, Olawale Olatunbosun
Adeyemi, Michael Olayinka
Gbotolorun, Olalekan Micah
Oduyebo, Omoniyi Omolola
Odeniyi, Olalekan
Adeyemo, Wasiu Lanre
author_facet Adamson, Olawale Olatunbosun
Adeyemi, Michael Olayinka
Gbotolorun, Olalekan Micah
Oduyebo, Omoniyi Omolola
Odeniyi, Olalekan
Adeyemo, Wasiu Lanre
author_sort Adamson, Olawale Olatunbosun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Odontogenic infections is a cause of mortality and morbidity in maxillofacial patients. This is largely due to resistance of organisms to antibiotics prescribed. OBJECTIVES: To isolate organisms involved in odontogenic infections and compare the sensitivity of the organisms to Ceftriaxone and Amoxicillin-Clavulanate. METHODS: The causative organisms and antibiotic sensitivity were determined by the following steps: Aspiration of pus done with needle, sample of pus or exudate collected using sterile swab if aspiration was unsuccessful and specimen were placed in transport media (thioglycolatebroth) and sent immediately to microbiology laboratory for culture of organisms and antibiotic sensitivity. RESULTS: Out of a total 55 samples taken for bacteriology, 42 (76.4%) yielded positive culture for bacteria. A total number of 21 bacteria species were identified from the positive cultures. Overall, 52% of isolated organisms were sensitive to amoxicillin-clavulanate, 70% were sensitive to Ceftriaxone while 24% were resistant to both antibiotics (Table 3). Ceftriaxone was statistically significantly more potent in inhibiting bacteria growth than amoxicillin-clavulanate (P =0.009).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7040266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Makerere Medical School
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70402662020-03-03 Comparison of sensitivity of bacteria isolated in odontogenic infections to ceftriaxone and amoxicillin-clavulanate Adamson, Olawale Olatunbosun Adeyemi, Michael Olayinka Gbotolorun, Olalekan Micah Oduyebo, Omoniyi Omolola Odeniyi, Olalekan Adeyemo, Wasiu Lanre Afr Health Sci Articles BACKGROUND: Odontogenic infections is a cause of mortality and morbidity in maxillofacial patients. This is largely due to resistance of organisms to antibiotics prescribed. OBJECTIVES: To isolate organisms involved in odontogenic infections and compare the sensitivity of the organisms to Ceftriaxone and Amoxicillin-Clavulanate. METHODS: The causative organisms and antibiotic sensitivity were determined by the following steps: Aspiration of pus done with needle, sample of pus or exudate collected using sterile swab if aspiration was unsuccessful and specimen were placed in transport media (thioglycolatebroth) and sent immediately to microbiology laboratory for culture of organisms and antibiotic sensitivity. RESULTS: Out of a total 55 samples taken for bacteriology, 42 (76.4%) yielded positive culture for bacteria. A total number of 21 bacteria species were identified from the positive cultures. Overall, 52% of isolated organisms were sensitive to amoxicillin-clavulanate, 70% were sensitive to Ceftriaxone while 24% were resistant to both antibiotics (Table 3). Ceftriaxone was statistically significantly more potent in inhibiting bacteria growth than amoxicillin-clavulanate (P =0.009). Makerere Medical School 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7040266/ /pubmed/32127812 http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v19i3.15 Text en © 2019 Adamson et al. Licensee African Health Sciences. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Adamson, Olawale Olatunbosun
Adeyemi, Michael Olayinka
Gbotolorun, Olalekan Micah
Oduyebo, Omoniyi Omolola
Odeniyi, Olalekan
Adeyemo, Wasiu Lanre
Comparison of sensitivity of bacteria isolated in odontogenic infections to ceftriaxone and amoxicillin-clavulanate
title Comparison of sensitivity of bacteria isolated in odontogenic infections to ceftriaxone and amoxicillin-clavulanate
title_full Comparison of sensitivity of bacteria isolated in odontogenic infections to ceftriaxone and amoxicillin-clavulanate
title_fullStr Comparison of sensitivity of bacteria isolated in odontogenic infections to ceftriaxone and amoxicillin-clavulanate
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of sensitivity of bacteria isolated in odontogenic infections to ceftriaxone and amoxicillin-clavulanate
title_short Comparison of sensitivity of bacteria isolated in odontogenic infections to ceftriaxone and amoxicillin-clavulanate
title_sort comparison of sensitivity of bacteria isolated in odontogenic infections to ceftriaxone and amoxicillin-clavulanate
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32127812
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v19i3.15
work_keys_str_mv AT adamsonolawaleolatunbosun comparisonofsensitivityofbacteriaisolatedinodontogenicinfectionstoceftriaxoneandamoxicillinclavulanate
AT adeyemimichaelolayinka comparisonofsensitivityofbacteriaisolatedinodontogenicinfectionstoceftriaxoneandamoxicillinclavulanate
AT gbotolorunolalekanmicah comparisonofsensitivityofbacteriaisolatedinodontogenicinfectionstoceftriaxoneandamoxicillinclavulanate
AT oduyeboomoniyiomolola comparisonofsensitivityofbacteriaisolatedinodontogenicinfectionstoceftriaxoneandamoxicillinclavulanate
AT odeniyiolalekan comparisonofsensitivityofbacteriaisolatedinodontogenicinfectionstoceftriaxoneandamoxicillinclavulanate
AT adeyemowasiulanre comparisonofsensitivityofbacteriaisolatedinodontogenicinfectionstoceftriaxoneandamoxicillinclavulanate