Cargando…

How to execute Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation model in medical health education

Improvements to education are necessary in order to keep up with the education requirements of today. The Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation model was created for the decision-making towards education improvement, so this model is appropriate in this regard. However, application...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, So young, Shin, Jwa-Seop, Lee, Seung-Hee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32299190
http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.40
_version_ 1783500986050936832
author Lee, So young
Shin, Jwa-Seop
Lee, Seung-Hee
author_facet Lee, So young
Shin, Jwa-Seop
Lee, Seung-Hee
author_sort Lee, So young
collection PubMed
description Improvements to education are necessary in order to keep up with the education requirements of today. The Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation model was created for the decision-making towards education improvement, so this model is appropriate in this regard. However, application of this model in the actual context of medical health education is considered difficult in the education environment. Thus, in this study, literature survey of previous studies was investigated to examine the execution procedure of how the CIPP model can be actually applied. For the execution procedure utilizing the CIPP model, the criteria and indicators were determined from analysis results and material was collected after setting the material collection method. Afterwards, the collected material was analyzed for each CIPP element, and finally, the relationship of each CIPP element was analyzed for the final improvement decision-making. In this study, these steps were followed and the methods employed in previous studies were organized. Particularly, the process of determining the criteria and indicators was important and required a significant effort. Literature survey was carried out to analyze the most widely used criteria through content analysis and obtained a total of 12 criteria. Additional emphasis is necessary in the importance of the criteria selection for the actual application of the CIPP model. Also, a diverse range of information can be obtained through qualitative as well as quantitative methods. Above all, since the CIPP evaluation model execution result becomes the basis for the execution of further improved evaluations, the first attempt of performing without hesitation is essential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7040424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70404242020-03-04 How to execute Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation model in medical health education Lee, So young Shin, Jwa-Seop Lee, Seung-Hee J Educ Eval Health Prof Review Improvements to education are necessary in order to keep up with the education requirements of today. The Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation model was created for the decision-making towards education improvement, so this model is appropriate in this regard. However, application of this model in the actual context of medical health education is considered difficult in the education environment. Thus, in this study, literature survey of previous studies was investigated to examine the execution procedure of how the CIPP model can be actually applied. For the execution procedure utilizing the CIPP model, the criteria and indicators were determined from analysis results and material was collected after setting the material collection method. Afterwards, the collected material was analyzed for each CIPP element, and finally, the relationship of each CIPP element was analyzed for the final improvement decision-making. In this study, these steps were followed and the methods employed in previous studies were organized. Particularly, the process of determining the criteria and indicators was important and required a significant effort. Literature survey was carried out to analyze the most widely used criteria through content analysis and obtained a total of 12 criteria. Additional emphasis is necessary in the importance of the criteria selection for the actual application of the CIPP model. Also, a diverse range of information can be obtained through qualitative as well as quantitative methods. Above all, since the CIPP evaluation model execution result becomes the basis for the execution of further improved evaluations, the first attempt of performing without hesitation is essential. Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute 2019-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7040424/ /pubmed/32299190 http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.40 Text en © 2019, Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Lee, So young
Shin, Jwa-Seop
Lee, Seung-Hee
How to execute Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation model in medical health education
title How to execute Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation model in medical health education
title_full How to execute Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation model in medical health education
title_fullStr How to execute Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation model in medical health education
title_full_unstemmed How to execute Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation model in medical health education
title_short How to execute Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation model in medical health education
title_sort how to execute context, input, process, and product evaluation model in medical health education
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32299190
http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.40
work_keys_str_mv AT leesoyoung howtoexecutecontextinputprocessandproductevaluationmodelinmedicalhealtheducation
AT shinjwaseop howtoexecutecontextinputprocessandproductevaluationmodelinmedicalhealtheducation
AT leeseunghee howtoexecutecontextinputprocessandproductevaluationmodelinmedicalhealtheducation