Cargando…

Comparison of implant stability measurements between a resonance frequency analysis device and a modified damping capacity analysis device: an in vitro study

PURPOSE: A stability-measuring device that utilizes damping capacity analysis (DCA) has recently been introduced in the field of dental implantology. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and reliability of this device by measuring the implant stability of ex vivo samples in comparison with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jungwon, Pyo, Se-Wook, Cho, Hyun-Jae, An, Jung-Sub, Lee, Jae-Hyun, Koo, Ki-Tae, Lee, Yong-Moo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Periodontology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128274
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2020.50.1.56
_version_ 1783500990232657920
author Lee, Jungwon
Pyo, Se-Wook
Cho, Hyun-Jae
An, Jung-Sub
Lee, Jae-Hyun
Koo, Ki-Tae
Lee, Yong-Moo
author_facet Lee, Jungwon
Pyo, Se-Wook
Cho, Hyun-Jae
An, Jung-Sub
Lee, Jae-Hyun
Koo, Ki-Tae
Lee, Yong-Moo
author_sort Lee, Jungwon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: A stability-measuring device that utilizes damping capacity analysis (DCA) has recently been introduced in the field of dental implantology. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and reliability of this device by measuring the implant stability of ex vivo samples in comparison with a resonance frequency analysis (RFA) device. METHODS: Six implant beds were prepared in porcine ribs using 3 different drilling protocols to simulate various implant stability conditions. Thirty-six pork ribs and 216 bone-level implants measuring 10 mm in height were used. The implant beds were prepared using 1 of the following 3 drilling protocols: 10-mm drilling depth with a 3.5-mm-diameter twist drill, 5-mm drilling depth with a 4.0-mm-diameter twist drill, and 10-mm drilling depth with a 4.0-mm-diameter twist drill. The first 108 implants were external-connection implants 4.0 mm in diameter, while the other 108 implants were internal-connection implants 4.3 mm in diameter. The peak insertion torque (PIT) during implant placement, the stability values obtained with DCA and RFA devices after implant placement, and the peak removal torque (PRT) during implant removal were measured. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the implant stability quotient (ISQ) results obtained using the RFA device at the medial, distal, ventral, and dorsal points were 0.997, 0.994, 0.994, and 0.998, respectively. The ICCs of the implant stability test (IST) results obtained using the DCA device at the corresponding locations were 0.972, 0.975, 0.974, and 0.976, respectively. Logarithmic relationships between PIT and IST, PIT and ISQ, PRT and IST, and PRT and ISQ were observed. The mean absolute difference between the ISQ and IST values on a Bland-Altman plot was −6.76 (−25.05 to 11.53, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of ex vivo studies, measurements made using the RFA and DCA devices were found to be correlated under a variety of stability conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7040444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Academy of Periodontology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70404442020-03-03 Comparison of implant stability measurements between a resonance frequency analysis device and a modified damping capacity analysis device: an in vitro study Lee, Jungwon Pyo, Se-Wook Cho, Hyun-Jae An, Jung-Sub Lee, Jae-Hyun Koo, Ki-Tae Lee, Yong-Moo J Periodontal Implant Sci Research Article PURPOSE: A stability-measuring device that utilizes damping capacity analysis (DCA) has recently been introduced in the field of dental implantology. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and reliability of this device by measuring the implant stability of ex vivo samples in comparison with a resonance frequency analysis (RFA) device. METHODS: Six implant beds were prepared in porcine ribs using 3 different drilling protocols to simulate various implant stability conditions. Thirty-six pork ribs and 216 bone-level implants measuring 10 mm in height were used. The implant beds were prepared using 1 of the following 3 drilling protocols: 10-mm drilling depth with a 3.5-mm-diameter twist drill, 5-mm drilling depth with a 4.0-mm-diameter twist drill, and 10-mm drilling depth with a 4.0-mm-diameter twist drill. The first 108 implants were external-connection implants 4.0 mm in diameter, while the other 108 implants were internal-connection implants 4.3 mm in diameter. The peak insertion torque (PIT) during implant placement, the stability values obtained with DCA and RFA devices after implant placement, and the peak removal torque (PRT) during implant removal were measured. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the implant stability quotient (ISQ) results obtained using the RFA device at the medial, distal, ventral, and dorsal points were 0.997, 0.994, 0.994, and 0.998, respectively. The ICCs of the implant stability test (IST) results obtained using the DCA device at the corresponding locations were 0.972, 0.975, 0.974, and 0.976, respectively. Logarithmic relationships between PIT and IST, PIT and ISQ, PRT and IST, and PRT and ISQ were observed. The mean absolute difference between the ISQ and IST values on a Bland-Altman plot was −6.76 (−25.05 to 11.53, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of ex vivo studies, measurements made using the RFA and DCA devices were found to be correlated under a variety of stability conditions. Korean Academy of Periodontology 2020-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7040444/ /pubmed/32128274 http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2020.50.1.56 Text en Copyright © 2020. Korean Academy of Periodontology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Jungwon
Pyo, Se-Wook
Cho, Hyun-Jae
An, Jung-Sub
Lee, Jae-Hyun
Koo, Ki-Tae
Lee, Yong-Moo
Comparison of implant stability measurements between a resonance frequency analysis device and a modified damping capacity analysis device: an in vitro study
title Comparison of implant stability measurements between a resonance frequency analysis device and a modified damping capacity analysis device: an in vitro study
title_full Comparison of implant stability measurements between a resonance frequency analysis device and a modified damping capacity analysis device: an in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparison of implant stability measurements between a resonance frequency analysis device and a modified damping capacity analysis device: an in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of implant stability measurements between a resonance frequency analysis device and a modified damping capacity analysis device: an in vitro study
title_short Comparison of implant stability measurements between a resonance frequency analysis device and a modified damping capacity analysis device: an in vitro study
title_sort comparison of implant stability measurements between a resonance frequency analysis device and a modified damping capacity analysis device: an in vitro study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128274
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2020.50.1.56
work_keys_str_mv AT leejungwon comparisonofimplantstabilitymeasurementsbetweenaresonancefrequencyanalysisdeviceandamodifieddampingcapacityanalysisdeviceaninvitrostudy
AT pyosewook comparisonofimplantstabilitymeasurementsbetweenaresonancefrequencyanalysisdeviceandamodifieddampingcapacityanalysisdeviceaninvitrostudy
AT chohyunjae comparisonofimplantstabilitymeasurementsbetweenaresonancefrequencyanalysisdeviceandamodifieddampingcapacityanalysisdeviceaninvitrostudy
AT anjungsub comparisonofimplantstabilitymeasurementsbetweenaresonancefrequencyanalysisdeviceandamodifieddampingcapacityanalysisdeviceaninvitrostudy
AT leejaehyun comparisonofimplantstabilitymeasurementsbetweenaresonancefrequencyanalysisdeviceandamodifieddampingcapacityanalysisdeviceaninvitrostudy
AT kookitae comparisonofimplantstabilitymeasurementsbetweenaresonancefrequencyanalysisdeviceandamodifieddampingcapacityanalysisdeviceaninvitrostudy
AT leeyongmoo comparisonofimplantstabilitymeasurementsbetweenaresonancefrequencyanalysisdeviceandamodifieddampingcapacityanalysisdeviceaninvitrostudy