Cargando…

Alveolar bone height according to the anatomical relationship between the maxillary molar and sinus

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the available alveolar bone height between the maxillary molars and the sinus floor according to their anatomical relationship using cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images. METHODS: A total of 752 maxillary first (M1) and second molars (M2) on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Yoon Joo, Kim, Young Hyun, Han, Sang-Sun, Jung, Ui-Won, Lee, Chena, Lee, Ari, Jeon, Kug Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Periodontology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128272
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2020.50.1.38
_version_ 1783500990469636096
author Choi, Yoon Joo
Kim, Young Hyun
Han, Sang-Sun
Jung, Ui-Won
Lee, Chena
Lee, Ari
Jeon, Kug Jin
author_facet Choi, Yoon Joo
Kim, Young Hyun
Han, Sang-Sun
Jung, Ui-Won
Lee, Chena
Lee, Ari
Jeon, Kug Jin
author_sort Choi, Yoon Joo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the available alveolar bone height between the maxillary molars and the sinus floor according to their anatomical relationship using cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images. METHODS: A total of 752 maxillary first (M1) and second molars (M2) on CBCT scans of 188 patients were selected. First, each maxillary molar was categorized as type 1, 2, 3, or 4 according to the relationship of the molar root with the maxillary sinus floor. The frequency distribution of each type was analyzed. Second, the shortest vertical distance (VD) of each molar was measured from the furcation midpoints of the roots to the lowest point of the sinus floor by 2 observers. Intraclass correlation coefficients and the t-test were calculated for the VD measurements. RESULTS: For M1, type 3 was the most frequent, followed by type 2. For M2, type 3 was the most common, followed by type 1. The VD measurements of type 1 were 9.51±3.68 mm and 8.07±2.73 mm for M1 and M2, and those of type 3 were 3.70±1.52 mm and 4.03±1.53 mm for M1 and M2, respectively. The VD measurements of M2 were significantly higher in female patients than in male patients. CONCLUSIONS: Type 3 was the most frequent anatomical relationship in the maxillary molars, and showed the lowest alveolar bone height. This information will help clinicians to prevent complications related to the maxillary sinus during maxillary molar treatment and to predict the available bone height for immediate implant planning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7040445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Academy of Periodontology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70404452020-03-03 Alveolar bone height according to the anatomical relationship between the maxillary molar and sinus Choi, Yoon Joo Kim, Young Hyun Han, Sang-Sun Jung, Ui-Won Lee, Chena Lee, Ari Jeon, Kug Jin J Periodontal Implant Sci Research Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the available alveolar bone height between the maxillary molars and the sinus floor according to their anatomical relationship using cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images. METHODS: A total of 752 maxillary first (M1) and second molars (M2) on CBCT scans of 188 patients were selected. First, each maxillary molar was categorized as type 1, 2, 3, or 4 according to the relationship of the molar root with the maxillary sinus floor. The frequency distribution of each type was analyzed. Second, the shortest vertical distance (VD) of each molar was measured from the furcation midpoints of the roots to the lowest point of the sinus floor by 2 observers. Intraclass correlation coefficients and the t-test were calculated for the VD measurements. RESULTS: For M1, type 3 was the most frequent, followed by type 2. For M2, type 3 was the most common, followed by type 1. The VD measurements of type 1 were 9.51±3.68 mm and 8.07±2.73 mm for M1 and M2, and those of type 3 were 3.70±1.52 mm and 4.03±1.53 mm for M1 and M2, respectively. The VD measurements of M2 were significantly higher in female patients than in male patients. CONCLUSIONS: Type 3 was the most frequent anatomical relationship in the maxillary molars, and showed the lowest alveolar bone height. This information will help clinicians to prevent complications related to the maxillary sinus during maxillary molar treatment and to predict the available bone height for immediate implant planning. Korean Academy of Periodontology 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7040445/ /pubmed/32128272 http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2020.50.1.38 Text en Copyright © 2020. Korean Academy of Periodontology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Choi, Yoon Joo
Kim, Young Hyun
Han, Sang-Sun
Jung, Ui-Won
Lee, Chena
Lee, Ari
Jeon, Kug Jin
Alveolar bone height according to the anatomical relationship between the maxillary molar and sinus
title Alveolar bone height according to the anatomical relationship between the maxillary molar and sinus
title_full Alveolar bone height according to the anatomical relationship between the maxillary molar and sinus
title_fullStr Alveolar bone height according to the anatomical relationship between the maxillary molar and sinus
title_full_unstemmed Alveolar bone height according to the anatomical relationship between the maxillary molar and sinus
title_short Alveolar bone height according to the anatomical relationship between the maxillary molar and sinus
title_sort alveolar bone height according to the anatomical relationship between the maxillary molar and sinus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128272
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2020.50.1.38
work_keys_str_mv AT choiyoonjoo alveolarboneheightaccordingtotheanatomicalrelationshipbetweenthemaxillarymolarandsinus
AT kimyounghyun alveolarboneheightaccordingtotheanatomicalrelationshipbetweenthemaxillarymolarandsinus
AT hansangsun alveolarboneheightaccordingtotheanatomicalrelationshipbetweenthemaxillarymolarandsinus
AT junguiwon alveolarboneheightaccordingtotheanatomicalrelationshipbetweenthemaxillarymolarandsinus
AT leechena alveolarboneheightaccordingtotheanatomicalrelationshipbetweenthemaxillarymolarandsinus
AT leeari alveolarboneheightaccordingtotheanatomicalrelationshipbetweenthemaxillarymolarandsinus
AT jeonkugjin alveolarboneheightaccordingtotheanatomicalrelationshipbetweenthemaxillarymolarandsinus