Cargando…
Effect of surface treatments and universal adhesive application on the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM materials
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of four computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) blocks repaired with composite resin using three different surface treatment protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four different CAD/CAM blocks were us...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128083 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.1.22 |
_version_ | 1783500991640895488 |
---|---|
author | Şişmanoğlu, Soner Gürcan, Aliye Tuğçe Yıldırım-Bilmez, Zuhal Turunç-Oğuzman, Rana Gümüştaş, Burak |
author_facet | Şişmanoğlu, Soner Gürcan, Aliye Tuğçe Yıldırım-Bilmez, Zuhal Turunç-Oğuzman, Rana Gümüştaş, Burak |
author_sort | Şişmanoğlu, Soner |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of four computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) blocks repaired with composite resin using three different surface treatment protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four different CAD/CAM blocks were used in this study: (1) flexible hybrid ceramic (FHC), (2) resin nanoceramic (RNC), (c) polymer infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) and (4) feldspar ceramic (FC). All groups were further divided into four subgroups according to surface treatment: control, hydrofluoric acid etching (HF), air-borne particle abrasion with aluminum oxide (AlO), and tribochemical silica coating (TSC). After surface treatments, silane was applied to half of the specimens. Then, a silane-containing universal adhesive was applied, and specimens were repaired with a composite, Next, μSBS test was performed. Additional specimens were examined with a contact profilometer and scanning electron microscopy. The data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey tests. RESULTS: The findings revealed that silane application yielded higher µSBS values (P<.05). All surface treatments were showed a significant increase in µSBS values compared to the control (P<.05). For FHC and RNC, the most influential treatments were AlO and TSC (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Surface treatment is mandatory when the silane is not preferred, but the best bond strength values were obtained with the combination of surface treatment and silane application. HF provides improved bond strength when the ceramic content of material increases, whereas AlO and TSC gives improved bond strength when the composite content of material increases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7040451 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70404512020-03-03 Effect of surface treatments and universal adhesive application on the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM materials Şişmanoğlu, Soner Gürcan, Aliye Tuğçe Yıldırım-Bilmez, Zuhal Turunç-Oğuzman, Rana Gümüştaş, Burak J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of four computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) blocks repaired with composite resin using three different surface treatment protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four different CAD/CAM blocks were used in this study: (1) flexible hybrid ceramic (FHC), (2) resin nanoceramic (RNC), (c) polymer infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) and (4) feldspar ceramic (FC). All groups were further divided into four subgroups according to surface treatment: control, hydrofluoric acid etching (HF), air-borne particle abrasion with aluminum oxide (AlO), and tribochemical silica coating (TSC). After surface treatments, silane was applied to half of the specimens. Then, a silane-containing universal adhesive was applied, and specimens were repaired with a composite, Next, μSBS test was performed. Additional specimens were examined with a contact profilometer and scanning electron microscopy. The data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey tests. RESULTS: The findings revealed that silane application yielded higher µSBS values (P<.05). All surface treatments were showed a significant increase in µSBS values compared to the control (P<.05). For FHC and RNC, the most influential treatments were AlO and TSC (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Surface treatment is mandatory when the silane is not preferred, but the best bond strength values were obtained with the combination of surface treatment and silane application. HF provides improved bond strength when the ceramic content of material increases, whereas AlO and TSC gives improved bond strength when the composite content of material increases. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2020-02 2020-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7040451/ /pubmed/32128083 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.1.22 Text en © 2020 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Şişmanoğlu, Soner Gürcan, Aliye Tuğçe Yıldırım-Bilmez, Zuhal Turunç-Oğuzman, Rana Gümüştaş, Burak Effect of surface treatments and universal adhesive application on the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM materials |
title | Effect of surface treatments and universal adhesive application on the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM materials |
title_full | Effect of surface treatments and universal adhesive application on the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM materials |
title_fullStr | Effect of surface treatments and universal adhesive application on the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM materials |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of surface treatments and universal adhesive application on the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM materials |
title_short | Effect of surface treatments and universal adhesive application on the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM materials |
title_sort | effect of surface treatments and universal adhesive application on the microshear bond strength of cad/cam materials |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128083 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.1.22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sismanoglusoner effectofsurfacetreatmentsanduniversaladhesiveapplicationonthemicroshearbondstrengthofcadcammaterials AT gurcanaliyetugce effectofsurfacetreatmentsanduniversaladhesiveapplicationonthemicroshearbondstrengthofcadcammaterials AT yıldırımbilmezzuhal effectofsurfacetreatmentsanduniversaladhesiveapplicationonthemicroshearbondstrengthofcadcammaterials AT turuncoguzmanrana effectofsurfacetreatmentsanduniversaladhesiveapplicationonthemicroshearbondstrengthofcadcammaterials AT gumustasburak effectofsurfacetreatmentsanduniversaladhesiveapplicationonthemicroshearbondstrengthofcadcammaterials |