Cargando…

Effects of type of magnet attachment and implant angulation in two implant overdenture models

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of type of magnet attachment and implant angulation in two implant overdenture models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnet attachments used in this study were flat and dome types (MGT5515, MGT5520D, Dentium Co., Seoul, Korea). Two implants with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, So-Yeon, Kang, Kyeong-Hwan, Lee, Jeong-Yol, Shin, Sang-Wan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128084
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.1.33
_version_ 1783500991867387904
author Song, So-Yeon
Kang, Kyeong-Hwan
Lee, Jeong-Yol
Shin, Sang-Wan
author_facet Song, So-Yeon
Kang, Kyeong-Hwan
Lee, Jeong-Yol
Shin, Sang-Wan
author_sort Song, So-Yeon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of type of magnet attachment and implant angulation in two implant overdenture models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnet attachments used in this study were flat and dome types (MGT5515, MGT5520D, Dentium Co., Seoul, Korea). Two implants with keepers were inserted in the resin blocks at a distance of 24 mm. For the first model, the implants were parallel to the vertical and perpendicular to the horizontal; for the second model, both were angulated 5 degrees to the mesial; for the third model, both were angulated 10 degrees toward the mesial. The retentive force was measured in both vertical and lateral directions. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 22.0 (α=.05). RESULTS: The flat type magnet attachment showed the highest lateral retentive force in the 20° divergent group (P<.05) and the dome type magnet attachment showed the highest lateral retentive force in the parallel group (P<.05). The vertical and lateral retentive force of the dome type magnet attachment was greater than that of the flat type magnet attachment in every direction (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the dome shape magnet attachment can resist vertical and lateral retentive force more superiorly than the flat type magnet attachment, regardless of angle, in the mandibular two implant model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7040452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70404522020-03-03 Effects of type of magnet attachment and implant angulation in two implant overdenture models Song, So-Yeon Kang, Kyeong-Hwan Lee, Jeong-Yol Shin, Sang-Wan J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of type of magnet attachment and implant angulation in two implant overdenture models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnet attachments used in this study were flat and dome types (MGT5515, MGT5520D, Dentium Co., Seoul, Korea). Two implants with keepers were inserted in the resin blocks at a distance of 24 mm. For the first model, the implants were parallel to the vertical and perpendicular to the horizontal; for the second model, both were angulated 5 degrees to the mesial; for the third model, both were angulated 10 degrees toward the mesial. The retentive force was measured in both vertical and lateral directions. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 22.0 (α=.05). RESULTS: The flat type magnet attachment showed the highest lateral retentive force in the 20° divergent group (P<.05) and the dome type magnet attachment showed the highest lateral retentive force in the parallel group (P<.05). The vertical and lateral retentive force of the dome type magnet attachment was greater than that of the flat type magnet attachment in every direction (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the dome shape magnet attachment can resist vertical and lateral retentive force more superiorly than the flat type magnet attachment, regardless of angle, in the mandibular two implant model. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2020-02 2020-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7040452/ /pubmed/32128084 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.1.33 Text en © 2020 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Song, So-Yeon
Kang, Kyeong-Hwan
Lee, Jeong-Yol
Shin, Sang-Wan
Effects of type of magnet attachment and implant angulation in two implant overdenture models
title Effects of type of magnet attachment and implant angulation in two implant overdenture models
title_full Effects of type of magnet attachment and implant angulation in two implant overdenture models
title_fullStr Effects of type of magnet attachment and implant angulation in two implant overdenture models
title_full_unstemmed Effects of type of magnet attachment and implant angulation in two implant overdenture models
title_short Effects of type of magnet attachment and implant angulation in two implant overdenture models
title_sort effects of type of magnet attachment and implant angulation in two implant overdenture models
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128084
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.1.33
work_keys_str_mv AT songsoyeon effectsoftypeofmagnetattachmentandimplantangulationintwoimplantoverdenturemodels
AT kangkyeonghwan effectsoftypeofmagnetattachmentandimplantangulationintwoimplantoverdenturemodels
AT leejeongyol effectsoftypeofmagnetattachmentandimplantangulationintwoimplantoverdenturemodels
AT shinsangwan effectsoftypeofmagnetattachmentandimplantangulationintwoimplantoverdenturemodels