Cargando…

Pharmacokinetic‐tailored approach to hemophilia prophylaxis: Medical decision making and outcomes

BACKGROUND: Clinical application of population pharmacokinetics (popPK) is of increasing interest to patients with hemophilia, providers, and payers. Routine use of popPK profiles in factor replacement prophylaxis decision making has the potential to maintain or improve efficacy and reduce product c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Croteau, Stacy E., Wheeler, Allison P., Khan, Osman, Haley, Kristina M., Borst, Alexandra J., Lattimore, Susan, Yeung, Cindy H. T., Iorio, Alfonso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32110764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12305
_version_ 1783501009108074496
author Croteau, Stacy E.
Wheeler, Allison P.
Khan, Osman
Haley, Kristina M.
Borst, Alexandra J.
Lattimore, Susan
Yeung, Cindy H. T.
Iorio, Alfonso
author_facet Croteau, Stacy E.
Wheeler, Allison P.
Khan, Osman
Haley, Kristina M.
Borst, Alexandra J.
Lattimore, Susan
Yeung, Cindy H. T.
Iorio, Alfonso
author_sort Croteau, Stacy E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical application of population pharmacokinetics (popPK) is of increasing interest to patients with hemophilia, providers, and payers. Routine use of popPK profiles in factor replacement prophylaxis decision making has the potential to maintain or improve efficacy and reduce product consumption. AIM: To investigate the feasibility of implementation and longitudinal assessment of pharmacokinetic (PK)‐tailored prophylaxis in routine clinical practice for hemophilia A and to describe factors that influence decision making for prescribed hemophilia prophylaxis. METHODS: This longitudinal, multicenter, prospective feasibility study of children and adults with hemophilia A without inhibitors used the Web Accessible Population Pharmacokinetic Service—Hemophilia (WAPPS‐Hemo) to generate PK profiles. Assessments over 12 weeks captured data on prescribed prophylaxis, popPK tool use, provider decision making, and patient‐reported outcomes. RESULTS: Eighteen participants aged 6 to 39 years enrolled; half used extended half‐life concentrates. Patient interest in their PK centered on general curiosity followed by a desire for participation in physical activity and decrease in infusion frequency. Providers used the WAPPS clinical calculator feature to simulate prophylaxis regimens under different dose, infusion, and trough conditions. Most targeted troughs were 1 to 3 IU/dL. The feasibility assessment demonstrated challenges with patient recruitment; however, the majority of participants successfully completed study assessments meeting feasibility targets. CONCLUSION: A larger‐scale study powered to evaluate the impact of PK‐tailored prophylaxis on clinical and patient‐reported outcomes is feasible with study design modifications to support increased recruitment rate. Shared decision making incorporating patient and provider goals is important and facilitated by regimen simulations with the clinical calculator.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7040534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70405342020-02-27 Pharmacokinetic‐tailored approach to hemophilia prophylaxis: Medical decision making and outcomes Croteau, Stacy E. Wheeler, Allison P. Khan, Osman Haley, Kristina M. Borst, Alexandra J. Lattimore, Susan Yeung, Cindy H. T. Iorio, Alfonso Res Pract Thromb Haemost Original Articles: Hemostasis BACKGROUND: Clinical application of population pharmacokinetics (popPK) is of increasing interest to patients with hemophilia, providers, and payers. Routine use of popPK profiles in factor replacement prophylaxis decision making has the potential to maintain or improve efficacy and reduce product consumption. AIM: To investigate the feasibility of implementation and longitudinal assessment of pharmacokinetic (PK)‐tailored prophylaxis in routine clinical practice for hemophilia A and to describe factors that influence decision making for prescribed hemophilia prophylaxis. METHODS: This longitudinal, multicenter, prospective feasibility study of children and adults with hemophilia A without inhibitors used the Web Accessible Population Pharmacokinetic Service—Hemophilia (WAPPS‐Hemo) to generate PK profiles. Assessments over 12 weeks captured data on prescribed prophylaxis, popPK tool use, provider decision making, and patient‐reported outcomes. RESULTS: Eighteen participants aged 6 to 39 years enrolled; half used extended half‐life concentrates. Patient interest in their PK centered on general curiosity followed by a desire for participation in physical activity and decrease in infusion frequency. Providers used the WAPPS clinical calculator feature to simulate prophylaxis regimens under different dose, infusion, and trough conditions. Most targeted troughs were 1 to 3 IU/dL. The feasibility assessment demonstrated challenges with patient recruitment; however, the majority of participants successfully completed study assessments meeting feasibility targets. CONCLUSION: A larger‐scale study powered to evaluate the impact of PK‐tailored prophylaxis on clinical and patient‐reported outcomes is feasible with study design modifications to support increased recruitment rate. Shared decision making incorporating patient and provider goals is important and facilitated by regimen simulations with the clinical calculator. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7040534/ /pubmed/32110764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12305 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles: Hemostasis
Croteau, Stacy E.
Wheeler, Allison P.
Khan, Osman
Haley, Kristina M.
Borst, Alexandra J.
Lattimore, Susan
Yeung, Cindy H. T.
Iorio, Alfonso
Pharmacokinetic‐tailored approach to hemophilia prophylaxis: Medical decision making and outcomes
title Pharmacokinetic‐tailored approach to hemophilia prophylaxis: Medical decision making and outcomes
title_full Pharmacokinetic‐tailored approach to hemophilia prophylaxis: Medical decision making and outcomes
title_fullStr Pharmacokinetic‐tailored approach to hemophilia prophylaxis: Medical decision making and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacokinetic‐tailored approach to hemophilia prophylaxis: Medical decision making and outcomes
title_short Pharmacokinetic‐tailored approach to hemophilia prophylaxis: Medical decision making and outcomes
title_sort pharmacokinetic‐tailored approach to hemophilia prophylaxis: medical decision making and outcomes
topic Original Articles: Hemostasis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32110764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12305
work_keys_str_mv AT croteaustacye pharmacokinetictailoredapproachtohemophiliaprophylaxismedicaldecisionmakingandoutcomes
AT wheelerallisonp pharmacokinetictailoredapproachtohemophiliaprophylaxismedicaldecisionmakingandoutcomes
AT khanosman pharmacokinetictailoredapproachtohemophiliaprophylaxismedicaldecisionmakingandoutcomes
AT haleykristinam pharmacokinetictailoredapproachtohemophiliaprophylaxismedicaldecisionmakingandoutcomes
AT borstalexandraj pharmacokinetictailoredapproachtohemophiliaprophylaxismedicaldecisionmakingandoutcomes
AT lattimoresusan pharmacokinetictailoredapproachtohemophiliaprophylaxismedicaldecisionmakingandoutcomes
AT yeungcindyht pharmacokinetictailoredapproachtohemophiliaprophylaxismedicaldecisionmakingandoutcomes
AT iorioalfonso pharmacokinetictailoredapproachtohemophiliaprophylaxismedicaldecisionmakingandoutcomes