Cargando…

Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond

An exponential market growth of Li-ion batteries (LIBs) has been observed in the past 20 years; approximately 670,000 tons of LIBs have been sold in 2017 alone. This trend will continue owing to the growing interest of consumers for electric vehicles, recent engagement of car manufacturers to produc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larouche, François, Tedjar, Farouk, Amouzegar, Kamyab, Houlachi, Georges, Bouchard, Patrick, Demopoulos, George P., Zaghib, Karim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050558
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13030801
_version_ 1783501057316356096
author Larouche, François
Tedjar, Farouk
Amouzegar, Kamyab
Houlachi, Georges
Bouchard, Patrick
Demopoulos, George P.
Zaghib, Karim
author_facet Larouche, François
Tedjar, Farouk
Amouzegar, Kamyab
Houlachi, Georges
Bouchard, Patrick
Demopoulos, George P.
Zaghib, Karim
author_sort Larouche, François
collection PubMed
description An exponential market growth of Li-ion batteries (LIBs) has been observed in the past 20 years; approximately 670,000 tons of LIBs have been sold in 2017 alone. This trend will continue owing to the growing interest of consumers for electric vehicles, recent engagement of car manufacturers to produce them, recent developments in energy storage facilities, and commitment of governments for the electrification of transportation. Although some limited recycling processes were developed earlier after the commercialization of LIBs, these are inadequate in the context of sustainable development. Therefore, significant efforts have been made to replace the commonly employed pyrometallurgical recycling method with a less detrimental approach, such as hydrometallurgical, in particular sulfate-based leaching, or direct recycling. Sulfate-based leaching is the only large-scale hydrometallurgical method currently used for recycling LIBs and serves as baseline for several pilot or demonstration projects currently under development. Conversely, most project and processes focus only on the recovery of Ni, Co, Mn, and less Li, and are wasting the iron phosphate originating from lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries. Although this battery type does not dominate the LIB market, its presence in the waste stream of LIBs causes some technical concerns that affect the profitability of current recycling processes. This review explores the current processes and alternative solutions to pyrometallurgy, including novel selective leaching processes or direct recycling approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7040742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70407422020-03-09 Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond Larouche, François Tedjar, Farouk Amouzegar, Kamyab Houlachi, Georges Bouchard, Patrick Demopoulos, George P. Zaghib, Karim Materials (Basel) Review An exponential market growth of Li-ion batteries (LIBs) has been observed in the past 20 years; approximately 670,000 tons of LIBs have been sold in 2017 alone. This trend will continue owing to the growing interest of consumers for electric vehicles, recent engagement of car manufacturers to produce them, recent developments in energy storage facilities, and commitment of governments for the electrification of transportation. Although some limited recycling processes were developed earlier after the commercialization of LIBs, these are inadequate in the context of sustainable development. Therefore, significant efforts have been made to replace the commonly employed pyrometallurgical recycling method with a less detrimental approach, such as hydrometallurgical, in particular sulfate-based leaching, or direct recycling. Sulfate-based leaching is the only large-scale hydrometallurgical method currently used for recycling LIBs and serves as baseline for several pilot or demonstration projects currently under development. Conversely, most project and processes focus only on the recovery of Ni, Co, Mn, and less Li, and are wasting the iron phosphate originating from lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries. Although this battery type does not dominate the LIB market, its presence in the waste stream of LIBs causes some technical concerns that affect the profitability of current recycling processes. This review explores the current processes and alternative solutions to pyrometallurgy, including novel selective leaching processes or direct recycling approaches. MDPI 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7040742/ /pubmed/32050558 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13030801 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Larouche, François
Tedjar, Farouk
Amouzegar, Kamyab
Houlachi, Georges
Bouchard, Patrick
Demopoulos, George P.
Zaghib, Karim
Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
title Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
title_full Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
title_fullStr Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
title_full_unstemmed Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
title_short Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
title_sort progress and status of hydrometallurgical and direct recycling of li-ion batteries and beyond
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050558
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13030801
work_keys_str_mv AT larouchefrancois progressandstatusofhydrometallurgicalanddirectrecyclingofliionbatteriesandbeyond
AT tedjarfarouk progressandstatusofhydrometallurgicalanddirectrecyclingofliionbatteriesandbeyond
AT amouzegarkamyab progressandstatusofhydrometallurgicalanddirectrecyclingofliionbatteriesandbeyond
AT houlachigeorges progressandstatusofhydrometallurgicalanddirectrecyclingofliionbatteriesandbeyond
AT bouchardpatrick progressandstatusofhydrometallurgicalanddirectrecyclingofliionbatteriesandbeyond
AT demopoulosgeorgep progressandstatusofhydrometallurgicalanddirectrecyclingofliionbatteriesandbeyond
AT zaghibkarim progressandstatusofhydrometallurgicalanddirectrecyclingofliionbatteriesandbeyond