Cargando…

Effect of Rough Surface Platforms on the Mucosal Attachment and the Marginal Bone Loss of Implants: A Dog Study

The preservation of peri-implant tissues is an important factor for implant success. This study aimed to assess the influence of the surface features of a butt-joint platform on soft-tissue attachment and bone resorption after immediate or delayed implant placement. All premolars and first molars of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montero, Javier, Fernández-Ruiz, Alberto, Pardal-Peláez, Beatriz, Jiménez-Guerra, Alvaro, Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio, Nicolás-Silvente, Ana I., Monsalve-Guil, Loreto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050603
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13030802
_version_ 1783501069083475968
author Montero, Javier
Fernández-Ruiz, Alberto
Pardal-Peláez, Beatriz
Jiménez-Guerra, Alvaro
Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio
Nicolás-Silvente, Ana I.
Monsalve-Guil, Loreto
author_facet Montero, Javier
Fernández-Ruiz, Alberto
Pardal-Peláez, Beatriz
Jiménez-Guerra, Alvaro
Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio
Nicolás-Silvente, Ana I.
Monsalve-Guil, Loreto
author_sort Montero, Javier
collection PubMed
description The preservation of peri-implant tissues is an important factor for implant success. This study aimed to assess the influence of the surface features of a butt-joint platform on soft-tissue attachment and bone resorption after immediate or delayed implant placement. All premolars and first molars of eight Beagle dogs were extracted on one mandible side. Twelve-weeks later, the same surgery was developed on the other side. Five implants with different platform surface configurations were randomly inserted into the post-extracted-sockets. On the healed side, the same five different implants were randomly placed. Implants were inserted 1 mm subcrestal to the buccal bony plate and were connected to abutments. The primary outcome variables were the supracrestal soft tissue (SST) adaptation and the bone resorption related to the implant shoulder. The SST height was significantly larger in immediate implants (IC95% 3.9–4.9 mm) compared to delayed implants (IC95% 3.1–3.5 mm). Marginal bone loss tended to be higher in immediate implants (IC95% 0.4–0.9 mm) than in delayed implants (IC95% 0.3–0.8 mm). Linear-regression analysis suggested that the SST height was significantly affected by the configuration of the platform (0.3–1.9 mm). Roughened surface platforms resulted in higher SST height when compared to machined surface platforms. Marginal bone loss was less pronounced in roughened designs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7040816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70408162020-03-09 Effect of Rough Surface Platforms on the Mucosal Attachment and the Marginal Bone Loss of Implants: A Dog Study Montero, Javier Fernández-Ruiz, Alberto Pardal-Peláez, Beatriz Jiménez-Guerra, Alvaro Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio Nicolás-Silvente, Ana I. Monsalve-Guil, Loreto Materials (Basel) Article The preservation of peri-implant tissues is an important factor for implant success. This study aimed to assess the influence of the surface features of a butt-joint platform on soft-tissue attachment and bone resorption after immediate or delayed implant placement. All premolars and first molars of eight Beagle dogs were extracted on one mandible side. Twelve-weeks later, the same surgery was developed on the other side. Five implants with different platform surface configurations were randomly inserted into the post-extracted-sockets. On the healed side, the same five different implants were randomly placed. Implants were inserted 1 mm subcrestal to the buccal bony plate and were connected to abutments. The primary outcome variables were the supracrestal soft tissue (SST) adaptation and the bone resorption related to the implant shoulder. The SST height was significantly larger in immediate implants (IC95% 3.9–4.9 mm) compared to delayed implants (IC95% 3.1–3.5 mm). Marginal bone loss tended to be higher in immediate implants (IC95% 0.4–0.9 mm) than in delayed implants (IC95% 0.3–0.8 mm). Linear-regression analysis suggested that the SST height was significantly affected by the configuration of the platform (0.3–1.9 mm). Roughened surface platforms resulted in higher SST height when compared to machined surface platforms. Marginal bone loss was less pronounced in roughened designs. MDPI 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7040816/ /pubmed/32050603 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13030802 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Montero, Javier
Fernández-Ruiz, Alberto
Pardal-Peláez, Beatriz
Jiménez-Guerra, Alvaro
Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio
Nicolás-Silvente, Ana I.
Monsalve-Guil, Loreto
Effect of Rough Surface Platforms on the Mucosal Attachment and the Marginal Bone Loss of Implants: A Dog Study
title Effect of Rough Surface Platforms on the Mucosal Attachment and the Marginal Bone Loss of Implants: A Dog Study
title_full Effect of Rough Surface Platforms on the Mucosal Attachment and the Marginal Bone Loss of Implants: A Dog Study
title_fullStr Effect of Rough Surface Platforms on the Mucosal Attachment and the Marginal Bone Loss of Implants: A Dog Study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Rough Surface Platforms on the Mucosal Attachment and the Marginal Bone Loss of Implants: A Dog Study
title_short Effect of Rough Surface Platforms on the Mucosal Attachment and the Marginal Bone Loss of Implants: A Dog Study
title_sort effect of rough surface platforms on the mucosal attachment and the marginal bone loss of implants: a dog study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050603
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13030802
work_keys_str_mv AT monterojavier effectofroughsurfaceplatformsonthemucosalattachmentandthemarginalbonelossofimplantsadogstudy
AT fernandezruizalberto effectofroughsurfaceplatformsonthemucosalattachmentandthemarginalbonelossofimplantsadogstudy
AT pardalpelaezbeatriz effectofroughsurfaceplatformsonthemucosalattachmentandthemarginalbonelossofimplantsadogstudy
AT jimenezguerraalvaro effectofroughsurfaceplatformsonthemucosalattachmentandthemarginalbonelossofimplantsadogstudy
AT velascoortegaeugenio effectofroughsurfaceplatformsonthemucosalattachmentandthemarginalbonelossofimplantsadogstudy
AT nicolassilventeanai effectofroughsurfaceplatformsonthemucosalattachmentandthemarginalbonelossofimplantsadogstudy
AT monsalveguilloreto effectofroughsurfaceplatformsonthemucosalattachmentandthemarginalbonelossofimplantsadogstudy