Cargando…

CAPAbility: comparison of the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the knee is a common condition that is expected to rise in the next two decades leading to an associated increase in total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Although there is little debate regarding the safety and efficacy of modern TKR, up to 20% of patients report poor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clarke, Celia, Pomeroy, Valerie, Clark, Allan, Creelman, Graham, Hancock, Nicola, Horton, Simon, Killett, Anne, Mann, Charles, Payerne, Estelle, Toms, Andoni, Roberts, Gareth, Smith, Toby, Swart, Ann Marie, McNamara, Iain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7041243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4143-4
_version_ 1783501121801682944
author Clarke, Celia
Pomeroy, Valerie
Clark, Allan
Creelman, Graham
Hancock, Nicola
Horton, Simon
Killett, Anne
Mann, Charles
Payerne, Estelle
Toms, Andoni
Roberts, Gareth
Smith, Toby
Swart, Ann Marie
McNamara, Iain
author_facet Clarke, Celia
Pomeroy, Valerie
Clark, Allan
Creelman, Graham
Hancock, Nicola
Horton, Simon
Killett, Anne
Mann, Charles
Payerne, Estelle
Toms, Andoni
Roberts, Gareth
Smith, Toby
Swart, Ann Marie
McNamara, Iain
author_sort Clarke, Celia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the knee is a common condition that is expected to rise in the next two decades leading to an associated increase in total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Although there is little debate regarding the safety and efficacy of modern TKR, up to 20% of patients report poor functional outcomes following surgery. This study will investigate the functional outcome of two TKRs; the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised knee arthroplasty, a newer knee prosthesis designed to provide guided motion and improve knee kinematics by more closely approximating a normal knee, and the GENESIS II, a proven existing design. AIM: To compare the change in Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores of the JOURNEY II BCS and the GENESIS II from pre-operation to 6 months post operation. METHODS: CAPAbility is a pragmatic, blinded, two-arm parallel, randomised controlled trial recruiting patients with primary osteoarthritis due to have unilateral TKR surgery across two UK hospitals. Eligible participants (n = 80) will be randomly allocated to receive either the JOURNEY II or the GENESIS II BCS knee prosthesis. Baseline measures will be taken prior to surgery. Patients will be followed at 1 week, 6 to 8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively. The primary outcome is the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 6 months post-operatively. Secondary outcomes include: other PROMs, biomechanical, radiological (computerised tomography, (CT)), clinical efficacy and safety outcomes. An embedded qualitative study will also investigate patients’ perspectives via interview pre and post surgery on variables known to affect the outcome of TKR surgery. A sub-sample (n = 30) will have additional in-depth interviews to explore the themes identified. The surgeons’ perspectives on the operation will be investigated by a group interview after all participants have undergone surgery. DISCUSSION: This trial will evaluate two generations of TKR using PROMS, kinematic and radiological analyses and qualitative outcomes from the patient perspective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number Registration, ID: ISRCTN32315753. Registered on 12 December 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7041243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70412432020-03-03 CAPAbility: comparison of the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial Clarke, Celia Pomeroy, Valerie Clark, Allan Creelman, Graham Hancock, Nicola Horton, Simon Killett, Anne Mann, Charles Payerne, Estelle Toms, Andoni Roberts, Gareth Smith, Toby Swart, Ann Marie McNamara, Iain Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the knee is a common condition that is expected to rise in the next two decades leading to an associated increase in total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Although there is little debate regarding the safety and efficacy of modern TKR, up to 20% of patients report poor functional outcomes following surgery. This study will investigate the functional outcome of two TKRs; the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised knee arthroplasty, a newer knee prosthesis designed to provide guided motion and improve knee kinematics by more closely approximating a normal knee, and the GENESIS II, a proven existing design. AIM: To compare the change in Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores of the JOURNEY II BCS and the GENESIS II from pre-operation to 6 months post operation. METHODS: CAPAbility is a pragmatic, blinded, two-arm parallel, randomised controlled trial recruiting patients with primary osteoarthritis due to have unilateral TKR surgery across two UK hospitals. Eligible participants (n = 80) will be randomly allocated to receive either the JOURNEY II or the GENESIS II BCS knee prosthesis. Baseline measures will be taken prior to surgery. Patients will be followed at 1 week, 6 to 8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively. The primary outcome is the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 6 months post-operatively. Secondary outcomes include: other PROMs, biomechanical, radiological (computerised tomography, (CT)), clinical efficacy and safety outcomes. An embedded qualitative study will also investigate patients’ perspectives via interview pre and post surgery on variables known to affect the outcome of TKR surgery. A sub-sample (n = 30) will have additional in-depth interviews to explore the themes identified. The surgeons’ perspectives on the operation will be investigated by a group interview after all participants have undergone surgery. DISCUSSION: This trial will evaluate two generations of TKR using PROMS, kinematic and radiological analyses and qualitative outcomes from the patient perspective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number Registration, ID: ISRCTN32315753. Registered on 12 December 2017. BioMed Central 2020-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7041243/ /pubmed/32093769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4143-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Clarke, Celia
Pomeroy, Valerie
Clark, Allan
Creelman, Graham
Hancock, Nicola
Horton, Simon
Killett, Anne
Mann, Charles
Payerne, Estelle
Toms, Andoni
Roberts, Gareth
Smith, Toby
Swart, Ann Marie
McNamara, Iain
CAPAbility: comparison of the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title CAPAbility: comparison of the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_full CAPAbility: comparison of the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr CAPAbility: comparison of the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed CAPAbility: comparison of the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_short CAPAbility: comparison of the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_sort capability: comparison of the journey ii bi-cruciate stabilised and genesis ii total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7041243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4143-4
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkecelia capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pomeroyvalerie capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT clarkallan capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT creelmangraham capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hancocknicola capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hortonsimon capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT killettanne capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT manncharles capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT payerneestelle capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tomsandoni capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT robertsgareth capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT smithtoby capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT swartannmarie capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mcnamaraiain capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial