Cargando…
CAPAbility: comparison of the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the knee is a common condition that is expected to rise in the next two decades leading to an associated increase in total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Although there is little debate regarding the safety and efficacy of modern TKR, up to 20% of patients report poor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7041243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4143-4 |
_version_ | 1783501121801682944 |
---|---|
author | Clarke, Celia Pomeroy, Valerie Clark, Allan Creelman, Graham Hancock, Nicola Horton, Simon Killett, Anne Mann, Charles Payerne, Estelle Toms, Andoni Roberts, Gareth Smith, Toby Swart, Ann Marie McNamara, Iain |
author_facet | Clarke, Celia Pomeroy, Valerie Clark, Allan Creelman, Graham Hancock, Nicola Horton, Simon Killett, Anne Mann, Charles Payerne, Estelle Toms, Andoni Roberts, Gareth Smith, Toby Swart, Ann Marie McNamara, Iain |
author_sort | Clarke, Celia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the knee is a common condition that is expected to rise in the next two decades leading to an associated increase in total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Although there is little debate regarding the safety and efficacy of modern TKR, up to 20% of patients report poor functional outcomes following surgery. This study will investigate the functional outcome of two TKRs; the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised knee arthroplasty, a newer knee prosthesis designed to provide guided motion and improve knee kinematics by more closely approximating a normal knee, and the GENESIS II, a proven existing design. AIM: To compare the change in Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores of the JOURNEY II BCS and the GENESIS II from pre-operation to 6 months post operation. METHODS: CAPAbility is a pragmatic, blinded, two-arm parallel, randomised controlled trial recruiting patients with primary osteoarthritis due to have unilateral TKR surgery across two UK hospitals. Eligible participants (n = 80) will be randomly allocated to receive either the JOURNEY II or the GENESIS II BCS knee prosthesis. Baseline measures will be taken prior to surgery. Patients will be followed at 1 week, 6 to 8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively. The primary outcome is the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 6 months post-operatively. Secondary outcomes include: other PROMs, biomechanical, radiological (computerised tomography, (CT)), clinical efficacy and safety outcomes. An embedded qualitative study will also investigate patients’ perspectives via interview pre and post surgery on variables known to affect the outcome of TKR surgery. A sub-sample (n = 30) will have additional in-depth interviews to explore the themes identified. The surgeons’ perspectives on the operation will be investigated by a group interview after all participants have undergone surgery. DISCUSSION: This trial will evaluate two generations of TKR using PROMS, kinematic and radiological analyses and qualitative outcomes from the patient perspective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number Registration, ID: ISRCTN32315753. Registered on 12 December 2017. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7041243 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70412432020-03-03 CAPAbility: comparison of the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial Clarke, Celia Pomeroy, Valerie Clark, Allan Creelman, Graham Hancock, Nicola Horton, Simon Killett, Anne Mann, Charles Payerne, Estelle Toms, Andoni Roberts, Gareth Smith, Toby Swart, Ann Marie McNamara, Iain Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the knee is a common condition that is expected to rise in the next two decades leading to an associated increase in total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Although there is little debate regarding the safety and efficacy of modern TKR, up to 20% of patients report poor functional outcomes following surgery. This study will investigate the functional outcome of two TKRs; the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised knee arthroplasty, a newer knee prosthesis designed to provide guided motion and improve knee kinematics by more closely approximating a normal knee, and the GENESIS II, a proven existing design. AIM: To compare the change in Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores of the JOURNEY II BCS and the GENESIS II from pre-operation to 6 months post operation. METHODS: CAPAbility is a pragmatic, blinded, two-arm parallel, randomised controlled trial recruiting patients with primary osteoarthritis due to have unilateral TKR surgery across two UK hospitals. Eligible participants (n = 80) will be randomly allocated to receive either the JOURNEY II or the GENESIS II BCS knee prosthesis. Baseline measures will be taken prior to surgery. Patients will be followed at 1 week, 6 to 8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively. The primary outcome is the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 6 months post-operatively. Secondary outcomes include: other PROMs, biomechanical, radiological (computerised tomography, (CT)), clinical efficacy and safety outcomes. An embedded qualitative study will also investigate patients’ perspectives via interview pre and post surgery on variables known to affect the outcome of TKR surgery. A sub-sample (n = 30) will have additional in-depth interviews to explore the themes identified. The surgeons’ perspectives on the operation will be investigated by a group interview after all participants have undergone surgery. DISCUSSION: This trial will evaluate two generations of TKR using PROMS, kinematic and radiological analyses and qualitative outcomes from the patient perspective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number Registration, ID: ISRCTN32315753. Registered on 12 December 2017. BioMed Central 2020-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7041243/ /pubmed/32093769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4143-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Clarke, Celia Pomeroy, Valerie Clark, Allan Creelman, Graham Hancock, Nicola Horton, Simon Killett, Anne Mann, Charles Payerne, Estelle Toms, Andoni Roberts, Gareth Smith, Toby Swart, Ann Marie McNamara, Iain CAPAbility: comparison of the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial |
title | CAPAbility: comparison of the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | CAPAbility: comparison of the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | CAPAbility: comparison of the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | CAPAbility: comparison of the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | CAPAbility: comparison of the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | capability: comparison of the journey ii bi-cruciate stabilised and genesis ii total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7041243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4143-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clarkecelia capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pomeroyvalerie capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT clarkallan capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT creelmangraham capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hancocknicola capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hortonsimon capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT killettanne capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT manncharles capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT payerneestelle capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tomsandoni capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT robertsgareth capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT smithtoby capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT swartannmarie capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mcnamaraiain capabilitycomparisonofthejourneyiibicruciatestabilisedandgenesisiitotalkneearthroplastyinperformanceandfunctionalabilityprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial |