Cargando…
The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) remains a debate and selection of patients to receive proper therapy is still an unsettled question. This systematic review was conducted to compare the effectiveness of prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) in pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7041271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01824-9 |
_version_ | 1783501128487403520 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Zhipeng Ni, Yuchao Chen, Junru Sun, Guangxi Zhang, Xingming Zhao, Jinge Zhu, Xudong Zhang, Haoran Zhu, Sha Dai, Jindong Shen, Pengfei Zeng, Hao |
author_facet | Wang, Zhipeng Ni, Yuchao Chen, Junru Sun, Guangxi Zhang, Xingming Zhao, Jinge Zhu, Xudong Zhang, Haoran Zhu, Sha Dai, Jindong Shen, Pengfei Zeng, Hao |
author_sort | Wang, Zhipeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) remains a debate and selection of patients to receive proper therapy is still an unsettled question. This systematic review was conducted to compare the effectiveness of prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with high-risk PCa and to select candidates for optimal treatment. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for eligible studies. We extracted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of all included studies. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS); the secondary outcomes were biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and clinical recurrence-free survival (CRFS). The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to Gleason score (GS), T stage and RT types. Quality of life (QoL) was compared with these two treatments. RESULTS: A total of 25 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, RP showed more survival benefits than RT on CSS (P = 0.003) and OS (P = 0.002); while RT was associated with better BRFS (P = 0.002) and MFS (P = 0.004). Subgroup analyses showed RT was associated with similar or even better survival outcomes compared to RP in patients with high GS, high T stage or received external beam radiotherapy plus brachytherapy (EBRT + BT). As for QoL, RP was associated with poorer urinary and sexual function but better performance in the bowel domain. CONCLUSION: RP could prolong the survival time of patients with high-risk PCa; however, RT could delay the disease progression, and combined RT (EBRT + BT) even brought preferable CSS and similar OS compared to RP. RT might be the prior choice for patients with high T stage or high GS. RP could lead to poorer urinary and sexual function, while bringing better performance in the bowel domain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7041271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70412712020-03-03 The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Zhipeng Ni, Yuchao Chen, Junru Sun, Guangxi Zhang, Xingming Zhao, Jinge Zhu, Xudong Zhang, Haoran Zhu, Sha Dai, Jindong Shen, Pengfei Zeng, Hao World J Surg Oncol Review BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) remains a debate and selection of patients to receive proper therapy is still an unsettled question. This systematic review was conducted to compare the effectiveness of prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with high-risk PCa and to select candidates for optimal treatment. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for eligible studies. We extracted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of all included studies. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS); the secondary outcomes were biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and clinical recurrence-free survival (CRFS). The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to Gleason score (GS), T stage and RT types. Quality of life (QoL) was compared with these two treatments. RESULTS: A total of 25 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, RP showed more survival benefits than RT on CSS (P = 0.003) and OS (P = 0.002); while RT was associated with better BRFS (P = 0.002) and MFS (P = 0.004). Subgroup analyses showed RT was associated with similar or even better survival outcomes compared to RP in patients with high GS, high T stage or received external beam radiotherapy plus brachytherapy (EBRT + BT). As for QoL, RP was associated with poorer urinary and sexual function but better performance in the bowel domain. CONCLUSION: RP could prolong the survival time of patients with high-risk PCa; however, RT could delay the disease progression, and combined RT (EBRT + BT) even brought preferable CSS and similar OS compared to RP. RT might be the prior choice for patients with high T stage or high GS. RP could lead to poorer urinary and sexual function, while bringing better performance in the bowel domain. BioMed Central 2020-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7041271/ /pubmed/32093688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01824-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Wang, Zhipeng Ni, Yuchao Chen, Junru Sun, Guangxi Zhang, Xingming Zhao, Jinge Zhu, Xudong Zhang, Haoran Zhu, Sha Dai, Jindong Shen, Pengfei Zeng, Hao The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7041271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01824-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangzhipeng theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT niyuchao theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenjunru theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sunguangxi theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangxingming theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhaojinge theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhuxudong theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhanghaoran theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhusha theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT daijindong theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shenpengfei theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zenghao theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangzhipeng efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT niyuchao efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenjunru efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sunguangxi efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangxingming efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhaojinge efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhuxudong efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhanghaoran efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhusha efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT daijindong efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shenpengfei efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zenghao efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |