Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) remains a debate and selection of patients to receive proper therapy is still an unsettled question. This systematic review was conducted to compare the effectiveness of prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) in pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zhipeng, Ni, Yuchao, Chen, Junru, Sun, Guangxi, Zhang, Xingming, Zhao, Jinge, Zhu, Xudong, Zhang, Haoran, Zhu, Sha, Dai, Jindong, Shen, Pengfei, Zeng, Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7041271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01824-9
_version_ 1783501128487403520
author Wang, Zhipeng
Ni, Yuchao
Chen, Junru
Sun, Guangxi
Zhang, Xingming
Zhao, Jinge
Zhu, Xudong
Zhang, Haoran
Zhu, Sha
Dai, Jindong
Shen, Pengfei
Zeng, Hao
author_facet Wang, Zhipeng
Ni, Yuchao
Chen, Junru
Sun, Guangxi
Zhang, Xingming
Zhao, Jinge
Zhu, Xudong
Zhang, Haoran
Zhu, Sha
Dai, Jindong
Shen, Pengfei
Zeng, Hao
author_sort Wang, Zhipeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) remains a debate and selection of patients to receive proper therapy is still an unsettled question. This systematic review was conducted to compare the effectiveness of prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with high-risk PCa and to select candidates for optimal treatment. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for eligible studies. We extracted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of all included studies. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS); the secondary outcomes were biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and clinical recurrence-free survival (CRFS). The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to Gleason score (GS), T stage and RT types. Quality of life (QoL) was compared with these two treatments. RESULTS: A total of 25 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, RP showed more survival benefits than RT on CSS (P = 0.003) and OS (P = 0.002); while RT was associated with better BRFS (P = 0.002) and MFS (P = 0.004). Subgroup analyses showed RT was associated with similar or even better survival outcomes compared to RP in patients with high GS, high T stage or received external beam radiotherapy plus brachytherapy (EBRT + BT). As for QoL, RP was associated with poorer urinary and sexual function but better performance in the bowel domain. CONCLUSION: RP could prolong the survival time of patients with high-risk PCa; however, RT could delay the disease progression, and combined RT (EBRT + BT) even brought preferable CSS and similar OS compared to RP. RT might be the prior choice for patients with high T stage or high GS. RP could lead to poorer urinary and sexual function, while bringing better performance in the bowel domain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7041271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70412712020-03-03 The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Zhipeng Ni, Yuchao Chen, Junru Sun, Guangxi Zhang, Xingming Zhao, Jinge Zhu, Xudong Zhang, Haoran Zhu, Sha Dai, Jindong Shen, Pengfei Zeng, Hao World J Surg Oncol Review BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) remains a debate and selection of patients to receive proper therapy is still an unsettled question. This systematic review was conducted to compare the effectiveness of prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with high-risk PCa and to select candidates for optimal treatment. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for eligible studies. We extracted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of all included studies. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS); the secondary outcomes were biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and clinical recurrence-free survival (CRFS). The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to Gleason score (GS), T stage and RT types. Quality of life (QoL) was compared with these two treatments. RESULTS: A total of 25 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, RP showed more survival benefits than RT on CSS (P = 0.003) and OS (P = 0.002); while RT was associated with better BRFS (P = 0.002) and MFS (P = 0.004). Subgroup analyses showed RT was associated with similar or even better survival outcomes compared to RP in patients with high GS, high T stage or received external beam radiotherapy plus brachytherapy (EBRT + BT). As for QoL, RP was associated with poorer urinary and sexual function but better performance in the bowel domain. CONCLUSION: RP could prolong the survival time of patients with high-risk PCa; however, RT could delay the disease progression, and combined RT (EBRT + BT) even brought preferable CSS and similar OS compared to RP. RT might be the prior choice for patients with high T stage or high GS. RP could lead to poorer urinary and sexual function, while bringing better performance in the bowel domain. BioMed Central 2020-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7041271/ /pubmed/32093688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01824-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Wang, Zhipeng
Ni, Yuchao
Chen, Junru
Sun, Guangxi
Zhang, Xingming
Zhao, Jinge
Zhu, Xudong
Zhang, Haoran
Zhu, Sha
Dai, Jindong
Shen, Pengfei
Zeng, Hao
The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7041271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01824-9
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzhipeng theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT niyuchao theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenjunru theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sunguangxi theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangxingming theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaojinge theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhuxudong theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanghaoran theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhusha theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT daijindong theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shenpengfei theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zenghao theefficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangzhipeng efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT niyuchao efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenjunru efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sunguangxi efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangxingming efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaojinge efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhuxudong efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanghaoran efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhusha efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT daijindong efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shenpengfei efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zenghao efficacyandsafetyofradicalprostatectomyandradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis