Cargando…

Influence of Implant Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND: The success rate of dental implants depends on the amount of crestal bone around the implants. Crestal module is the transosteal region of implant that is designed to receive the prosthetic component. The design of crestal module influences the crestal bone loss around implants. AIM: The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patil, Yojana B., Asopa, Swati Joshi, Deepa, Goel, Aashana, Jyoti, Divya, Somayaji, Nagaveni S., Sabharwal, Robin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7041357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32165832
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_28_19
_version_ 1783501144176197632
author Patil, Yojana B.
Asopa, Swati Joshi
Deepa,
Goel, Aashana
Jyoti, Divya
Somayaji, Nagaveni S.
Sabharwal, Robin
author_facet Patil, Yojana B.
Asopa, Swati Joshi
Deepa,
Goel, Aashana
Jyoti, Divya
Somayaji, Nagaveni S.
Sabharwal, Robin
author_sort Patil, Yojana B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The success rate of dental implants depends on the amount of crestal bone around the implants. Crestal module is the transosteal region of implant that is designed to receive the prosthetic component. The design of crestal module influences the crestal bone loss around implants. AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the crestal bone loss around implants with smooth collar and implants with micro threaded rough collar design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 150 individuals received 100 dental implants. Each individual received one implant with smooth collar design (Group-A) and one implant with microthreaded rough collar design (Group-B) in the posterior edentulous region. All the 100 implants were prosthetically loaded after a healing period of 3 months. Crestal bone loss was measured on mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual side of each implant using periapical radiographs before loading (baseline), immediately after loading, 6, and 12 months after loading. RESULTS: The average crestal bone loss 12 months after loading the implants in Group A and Group B was 3.75 mm and 3.23 mm, respectively, the value being statistically significant (P < 0.05). In both Group A and Group B, the average crestal bone loss was maximum on the lingual side followed by buccal, distal, and mesial sides. CONCLUSION: Crestal bone loss around rough-surfaced microthreaded neck implants was significantly lower than smooth-surfaced neck implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7041357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70413572020-03-12 Influence of Implant Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss: A Comparative Study Patil, Yojana B. Asopa, Swati Joshi Deepa, Goel, Aashana Jyoti, Divya Somayaji, Nagaveni S. Sabharwal, Robin Niger J Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: The success rate of dental implants depends on the amount of crestal bone around the implants. Crestal module is the transosteal region of implant that is designed to receive the prosthetic component. The design of crestal module influences the crestal bone loss around implants. AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the crestal bone loss around implants with smooth collar and implants with micro threaded rough collar design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 150 individuals received 100 dental implants. Each individual received one implant with smooth collar design (Group-A) and one implant with microthreaded rough collar design (Group-B) in the posterior edentulous region. All the 100 implants were prosthetically loaded after a healing period of 3 months. Crestal bone loss was measured on mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual side of each implant using periapical radiographs before loading (baseline), immediately after loading, 6, and 12 months after loading. RESULTS: The average crestal bone loss 12 months after loading the implants in Group A and Group B was 3.75 mm and 3.23 mm, respectively, the value being statistically significant (P < 0.05). In both Group A and Group B, the average crestal bone loss was maximum on the lingual side followed by buccal, distal, and mesial sides. CONCLUSION: Crestal bone loss around rough-surfaced microthreaded neck implants was significantly lower than smooth-surfaced neck implants. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7041357/ /pubmed/32165832 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_28_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Nigerian Journal of Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Patil, Yojana B.
Asopa, Swati Joshi
Deepa,
Goel, Aashana
Jyoti, Divya
Somayaji, Nagaveni S.
Sabharwal, Robin
Influence of Implant Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss: A Comparative Study
title Influence of Implant Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss: A Comparative Study
title_full Influence of Implant Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Influence of Implant Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Implant Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss: A Comparative Study
title_short Influence of Implant Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss: A Comparative Study
title_sort influence of implant neck design on crestal bone loss: a comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7041357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32165832
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_28_19
work_keys_str_mv AT patilyojanab influenceofimplantneckdesignoncrestalbonelossacomparativestudy
AT asopaswatijoshi influenceofimplantneckdesignoncrestalbonelossacomparativestudy
AT deepa influenceofimplantneckdesignoncrestalbonelossacomparativestudy
AT goelaashana influenceofimplantneckdesignoncrestalbonelossacomparativestudy
AT jyotidivya influenceofimplantneckdesignoncrestalbonelossacomparativestudy
AT somayajinagavenis influenceofimplantneckdesignoncrestalbonelossacomparativestudy
AT sabharwalrobin influenceofimplantneckdesignoncrestalbonelossacomparativestudy