Cargando…
Influence of Implant Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss: A Comparative Study
BACKGROUND: The success rate of dental implants depends on the amount of crestal bone around the implants. Crestal module is the transosteal region of implant that is designed to receive the prosthetic component. The design of crestal module influences the crestal bone loss around implants. AIM: The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7041357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32165832 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_28_19 |
_version_ | 1783501144176197632 |
---|---|
author | Patil, Yojana B. Asopa, Swati Joshi Deepa, Goel, Aashana Jyoti, Divya Somayaji, Nagaveni S. Sabharwal, Robin |
author_facet | Patil, Yojana B. Asopa, Swati Joshi Deepa, Goel, Aashana Jyoti, Divya Somayaji, Nagaveni S. Sabharwal, Robin |
author_sort | Patil, Yojana B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The success rate of dental implants depends on the amount of crestal bone around the implants. Crestal module is the transosteal region of implant that is designed to receive the prosthetic component. The design of crestal module influences the crestal bone loss around implants. AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the crestal bone loss around implants with smooth collar and implants with micro threaded rough collar design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 150 individuals received 100 dental implants. Each individual received one implant with smooth collar design (Group-A) and one implant with microthreaded rough collar design (Group-B) in the posterior edentulous region. All the 100 implants were prosthetically loaded after a healing period of 3 months. Crestal bone loss was measured on mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual side of each implant using periapical radiographs before loading (baseline), immediately after loading, 6, and 12 months after loading. RESULTS: The average crestal bone loss 12 months after loading the implants in Group A and Group B was 3.75 mm and 3.23 mm, respectively, the value being statistically significant (P < 0.05). In both Group A and Group B, the average crestal bone loss was maximum on the lingual side followed by buccal, distal, and mesial sides. CONCLUSION: Crestal bone loss around rough-surfaced microthreaded neck implants was significantly lower than smooth-surfaced neck implants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7041357 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70413572020-03-12 Influence of Implant Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss: A Comparative Study Patil, Yojana B. Asopa, Swati Joshi Deepa, Goel, Aashana Jyoti, Divya Somayaji, Nagaveni S. Sabharwal, Robin Niger J Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: The success rate of dental implants depends on the amount of crestal bone around the implants. Crestal module is the transosteal region of implant that is designed to receive the prosthetic component. The design of crestal module influences the crestal bone loss around implants. AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the crestal bone loss around implants with smooth collar and implants with micro threaded rough collar design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 150 individuals received 100 dental implants. Each individual received one implant with smooth collar design (Group-A) and one implant with microthreaded rough collar design (Group-B) in the posterior edentulous region. All the 100 implants were prosthetically loaded after a healing period of 3 months. Crestal bone loss was measured on mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual side of each implant using periapical radiographs before loading (baseline), immediately after loading, 6, and 12 months after loading. RESULTS: The average crestal bone loss 12 months after loading the implants in Group A and Group B was 3.75 mm and 3.23 mm, respectively, the value being statistically significant (P < 0.05). In both Group A and Group B, the average crestal bone loss was maximum on the lingual side followed by buccal, distal, and mesial sides. CONCLUSION: Crestal bone loss around rough-surfaced microthreaded neck implants was significantly lower than smooth-surfaced neck implants. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7041357/ /pubmed/32165832 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_28_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Nigerian Journal of Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Patil, Yojana B. Asopa, Swati Joshi Deepa, Goel, Aashana Jyoti, Divya Somayaji, Nagaveni S. Sabharwal, Robin Influence of Implant Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss: A Comparative Study |
title | Influence of Implant Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss: A Comparative Study |
title_full | Influence of Implant Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss: A Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | Influence of Implant Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss: A Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Implant Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss: A Comparative Study |
title_short | Influence of Implant Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss: A Comparative Study |
title_sort | influence of implant neck design on crestal bone loss: a comparative study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7041357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32165832 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_28_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patilyojanab influenceofimplantneckdesignoncrestalbonelossacomparativestudy AT asopaswatijoshi influenceofimplantneckdesignoncrestalbonelossacomparativestudy AT deepa influenceofimplantneckdesignoncrestalbonelossacomparativestudy AT goelaashana influenceofimplantneckdesignoncrestalbonelossacomparativestudy AT jyotidivya influenceofimplantneckdesignoncrestalbonelossacomparativestudy AT somayajinagavenis influenceofimplantneckdesignoncrestalbonelossacomparativestudy AT sabharwalrobin influenceofimplantneckdesignoncrestalbonelossacomparativestudy |